Who's A Rat - Largest Online Database of Informants and Agents
HomeMembers LoginLatest NewsRefer A LawyerMessage BoardOnline StoreAffiliatesAbout UsContact Us
Who's A Rat - Largest Online Database of Informants and Agents Worldwide!
Site Navigation
Visit Our Store
Refer A Lawyer
Link To Us
Latest News
Top Secret Documents
Make A Donation
Important Case Law
Members Login
Message Board
Legal Information
Advertise your AD, Book or Movie

Informants and Agents?Who's a Rat Message Board

Sign up Calendar

  Author   Comment   Page 1 of 6      1   2   3   4   Next   »

Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #1 
Seattle Post Intellingencer has become the main Public Relations arm for the FBI on the West Coast.They must have illegaly witetapped the owner and blackmailed the paper. Why would anyone advocate hiring more people from an organization that helped assassinate President Kennedy, gave us Waco and created 911?
a couple of easy reads also see http://www.franklinfiles.org

July 5, 2007 5:09 p.m. PT

Mortgage Fraud: Needed: FBI staff


Some right-wingers are fond of enumerating the many ways terrorists will win. For example, if Americans stop shopping, the terrorists win. If we don't drill in the Arctic for oil, the terrorists win. If we don't keep our troops in Iraq, the terrorists win.

We wonder how the terrorists feel about our government's anti-terror efforts leeching away about 2,500 Federal Bureau of Investigation agents from duties such as dealing with hate crimes, identity theft and, brace yourselves Seattle home buyers -- mortgage fraud.

The Mortgage Bankers Association figures that $6.25 million is needed to add enough FBI agents and federal prosecutors to investigate and prosecute the booming mortgage fraud racket. As it stands, this type of white-collar crime has run amok, with last year's losses exceeding $4 billion. And since 2005, Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., has been pushing to add 1,000 agents to the FBI, saying that we ought to be able to fight terrorism and domestic crime (which he compares with walking and chewing gum at the same time).

The Seattle FBI office is ridiculously short-staffed, requiring 53 additional special agents before it meets the national average for a city of this size. And while mortgage fraud cases here aren't as bad as they are elsewhere, our growing market leaves the door open for that disaster. Mortgage con artists can ply their trade knowing that the FBI's financial investigators who pursued them have moved on and not been replaced.

Hey, Senate: Give us the budget to add more agents. We need 'em, badly.

Man caught in women's bathroom is an FBI employee

May 25, 2007 09:09 PM

This story contains details that some readers may find objectionable.

And FBI employee is on the other side of the law, facing charges of inappropriate conduct in a woman's bathroom on the University of Arizona Campus.

According to a University Police report, a woman was cleaning the bathroom on May 3, when she saw a stall door open. Inside stood a man with his pants down, masturbating.

"That's actually shocking," says student Meghan Carey. "It makes me question who's walking around U of A."

"I think that masturbation can be a very natural form of sexual expression," says student Stephanie Castle, "but there needs to be a time and a place for that."

The police report states, the witness went to get help. When she returned with an officer she spotted the man, later identified as Ryan Seese, outside the same bathroom.

Seese took off down a hallway and ran out the door. Police chased him into a parking garage where he was arrested.

Seese now faces charges of public sexual indecency, sexual indecency and trespassing.

He also told police he's an FBI agent.

The Bureau verifies his employment but will not reveal his position or status.

Meanwhile, students say this incident is a good reminder not to let their guard down, even in a comfortable place like the student union.

"I'll definitely watch out a little more," says Carey. "I have to be more aware."

Some students say they would like to see UAPD set up more patrols around campus to make them feel safer.

Prosecutors move to dismiss charges against former Scout leader

January 3, 2007

NEW HAVEN, Conn. --Federal prosecutors have moved to dismiss charges against a retired FBI agent who was indicted on child sex charges dating back more than a decade when he was a Boy Scout leader, in response to the death of his accuser.

William Hutton, 63, of Killingworth, was arrested in February on charges he enticed a member of his Scout troop to Maine for the purpose of sexual activity in 1994 and 1995.

Prosecutor John A. Danaher III moved to dismiss the indictment on Dec. 19, and Judge Mark R. Kravitz granted the motion three days later, federal court records show.

On Dec. 26, the prosecutor moved to dismiss a revised indictment that had been returned by a federal grand jury in late March. There was no indication in court records that Kravitz has issued a ruling on that indictment.

Both indictments alleged crimes against the same person, who has never been publicly identified. The newer indictment added allegations that an August 1995 trip also included a stop in New Hampshire for illegal sexual activity.

Both of Danaher's motions cited "the sudden and unexpected death" of the accuser.

Hutton's lawyer, Hugh F. Keefe of New Haven, stressed Hutton had pleaded not guilty.

"Mr. Hutton was very upset by the news of the passing of the gentleman," Keefe said.

Hutton had been released on a $200,000 bond. He may not own any firearms or have any unsupervised contact with children. He was also ordered to stay away from playgrounds, schools, arcades or anywhere children congregate.

The case had been scheduled to go to trial this month in U.S. District Court in New Haven.

second read
Former Scout leader-FBI agent indicted on child sex charges

February 3, 2006, 5:59 PM EST

NEW HAVEN, Conn. (AP) _ A retired FBI agent was indicted Friday on federal child sex charges dating back more than a decade when he was a Boy Scout leader.

William Hutton, 63, of Killingworth, was arrested Friday. The federal grand jury indictment offers few details about the case but accuses Hutton of enticing a member of his Scout troop to Maine for the purpose of sexual activity in 1994 and 1995.

"It's obviously devastating. He was an FBI agent in this district and was reputed in this district," defense attorney Hugh Keefe said. "The people who worked with him in the U.S. attorney's office and FBI respected him."

Keefe said the investigation has been going on for years. He would not discuss the details of the case or how the allegations surfaced.

Investigators asked anyone who knows anything about the case to call the FBI. U.S. Attorney Kevin O'Connor said that's standard practice whenever there might be more victims.

"In any case that's a concern," O'Connor said. "Whether that's the situation here I can't say."

If convicted on all four charges, Hutton faces up to 30 years in prison and up to $250,000 in fines.

Hutton was released on a $200,00 bond. He may not own any firearms or have any unsupervised contact with children. He was also ordered to stay away from playgrounds, schools, arcades or anywhere children congregate.

FBI agent in charge of FBI Child Abuse program sued by his daughters for incest

THE DENVER POST - Voice of the Rocky Mountain Empire
May 17, 1990
Sisters win sex lawsuit vs. dad $2.3 million given for years of abuse
By Howard Prankratz
Denver Post Legal Affairs Writer

Two daughters of former state and federal law enforcement official Edward Rodgers were awarded $2.319,400 yesterday, after a Denver judge and jury found that the women suffered years of abuse at the hands of their father.

The award to Sharon Simone, 45, and Susan Hammond, 44, followed testimony of Rodgers’ four daughters in person or through depositions, describing repeated physical abuse and sexual assaults by their father from 1944 through 1965.

Rodgers, 72, who became a child abuse expert after retiring from the FBI and joining the colorado Springs DA’s office, failed to appear for the trial. But in a deposition taken in March, Rodgers denied ever hitting or sexually abusing his children.

He admitted that he thought of himself as a "domineering s.o.b. who demanded strict responses from my children, strict obedience." But it never approached child abuse, Rodgers said. "Did I make mistakes? Damn right I did, just like any other father or mother..."

Thomas Gresham, Rodger’s former attorney, withdrew from the case recently after being unable to locate his client. Rodgers recently contacted one of his sons from a Texas town along the Mexican border. Gresham said his last contact with Rodgers was on April 24.

The sisters reacted quietly to the verdict, and with relief that their stories of abuse had finally been told.

"I feel really good that I’ve gone public with this,"Hammond said. "I am a victim, the shame isn’t mine, the horror happened to me. I’m not bad.
"My father did shameful and horrible things to me and my brothers and sisters. I don’t believe he is a shameful and horrible man, but he has to be held accountable," Hammond added.

The lawsuit deeply divided the Rodgers family, with Rodgers’ three sons questioning their sister’s motives.

Immediately after the verdict, son Steve Rodgers, 37, reacted angrily, yelling at his sisters in the courtroom.

Later, Rodgers said he loves his father and stands by him. He said his sisters had told him their father had to be exposed the way Nazi war criminals have been exposed.

"In a way I’m angry with my father for not being here. But I’m sympathetic because he would have walked into a gross crucifixion," Rodgers said.

Steve Rodgers never denied that he and his siblings were physically abused, but disputed that his father molested his sisters.
Before the jury’s award, Denver District Judge William Meyer found that Rodger’s conduct toward Simone and Hammond was negligent and "outrageous."

Despite the length of time since the abuse, the jury determined the sisters could legally bring the suit. The statute of limitations for a civil suit is two years, but jurors determined that the sisters became aware of he nature and extent of their injury only within the last two years, during therapy.

The jury then determined the damages, finding $1,240,000 for Simone and 1,079,000 for Hammond.

The sisters had alleged in their suit filed last July that Rodgers subjected his seven children to a "pattern of emotional, physical, sexual and incestual abuse."

As a result of the abuse, the women claimed their emotional lives had been left in a shambles, requiring extensive therapy for both and repeated hospitalizations of Hammond, who was acutely suicidal. Simone developed obsessive behavior and became so unable to function she resigned a position with a Boston-based college.

Despite the judgment yesterday, Rodgers cannot be criminally charged. the statue of limitations in Colorado for sexual assault on children is 10 years.
Rodgers, who worked for the FBI for 27 years, much of it in Denver, became chief investigator for the district attorney’s office in Colorado Sp;rings. during his employment at the DA’s office from 1967 until 1983, he became a well-known figure in Colorado Springs, and lectured and wrote about child abuse both locally and nationwide.

He wrote a manual called " A Compendium -- Child Abuse by the National College of District Attorney’s," and helped put together manuals on child abuse for the New York state police and a national child abuse center.

FBI agent in charge of investigating other FBI agents for crimes sentenced to 12 years in prison for pedophilia

Ex-FBI official pleads guilty to child molestation
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The former chief internal watchdog at the FBI has pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting a 6-year-old girl and has admitted he had a history of molesting other children before he joined the bureau for a two-decade career.

John H. Conditt Jr., 53, who retired in 2001, was sentenced last Friday to 12 years in prison in Tarrant County court in Fort Worth, Texas, after he admitted he molested the daughter of two FBI agents after he retired. He acknowledged molesting at least two other girls before his law enforcement career, his lawyer said.

Conditt sought treatment for sex offenders after his arrest last year, said his attorney, Toby Goldsmith.

"The problem these people have is they don't really feel like it is their fault," Goldsmith said. "The treatment doesn't work unless you admit you are the one who instigated it, and he did that."

Conditt headed the internal affairs unit that investigates agent wrongdoing for the Office of Professional Responsibility at FBI headquarters in Washington from 1999 until his retirement in June 2001, the FBI said. He wrote articles in law enforcement journals on how police agencies could effectively investigate their own conduct.

FBI officials said Tuesday they had no information to suggest that Conditt had any problems during his career and he was never the subject of an investigation.

Tarrant County Assistant District Attorney Mitch Poe, who prosecuted the case, said he wanted a longer prison sentence and was skeptical of Conditt's claim that his molestation of children subsided during his FBI career.

"Both myself and the judge in open court, we were kind of skeptical but we don't have any evidence," Poe said.

A recently retired FBI whistleblower who brought allegations to Conditt's office that agents had not aggressively pursued evidence of sexual abuse in Indian country said Tuesday she now questions whether his personal history affected that decision.

"Before, it never made any sense," retired agent Jane Turner said of the FBI's decision to decline to further investigate her allegations. "Now I can understand. Why in the world wouldn't you want to investigate that?"

Goldsmith said he was concerned about the safety of his client in prison given that he is a former FBI agent and an admitted child molester. "He's not going to be comfortable in the penitentiary," the lawyer said.

Goldsmith said his client had admitted that he had molested at least two other girls before he became an FBI agent more than 30 years ago, but that there was no evidence of any wrongdoing while he served in the bureau.

"It seems that he never did because he had stricter control at that time," the lawyer said.

Conditt could have faced life in prison, and prosecutors requested he get 50 years. The judge sentenced him to 12 years in prison, in part citing Conditt's decision to spare the victim the trauma of a trial, Goldsmith said.

Conditt's conviction is the latest controversy to strike the FBI's Office of Professional Responsibility.

Last year, FBI Director Robert Mueller transferred the head of the office to another supervisory assignment outside Washington, three months after rebuking him for his conduct toward a whistleblower.

That whistleblower, John Roberts, alleged the FBI disciplinary office had a double standard that let supervisors off easier than line agents.

Those allegations prompted investigations by Congress and the Justice Department inspector general. The latter concluded there was no systematic favoritism of senior managers over rank-and-file employees but there was a double standard in some cases involving crude sexual jokes and remarks.

Monday August 8, 2005 Longtime FBI agent sentenced to prison on child porn count


Associated Press Writer

BOISE, Idaho (AP) � A longtime FBI agent who helped arrest mountain-man Claude Dallas and was involved in a deadly 1984 siege involving white supremacists in Washington state is going to prison for 12 months after pleading guilty to possession of child pornography.

William Buie, 64, of Boise, most recently worked as an investigator for the Idaho attorney general's office.

He was sentenced Monday in U.S. District Court to a year in prison on one count of possession of sexually exploitative materials involving minors. He had pleaded guilty in March.

Buie told agents with the Utah Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force that he learned to access child pornography Web sites while attending a seminar on preventing child exploitation as part of his law enforcement training in 2000 or 2001.

He acknowledged using his bank debit card to gain access to child erotica and child pornography Web sites, including using the card to buy a month of access to a child pornography Internet site entitled ''Eternal Nymphets.''

Buie, a former FBI sniper who worked for about 30 years for the agency in Seattle, Butte, Mont., and Salt Lake City, participated in the arrest of Dallas in 1982 in Paradise Valley, Nev., after the self-proclaimed mountain man had spent a year on the run after killing two Idaho Fish and Game agents. Dallas served 22 years in prison for manslaughter.

Buie also took part in the 1984 siege on Whidbey Island, Wash. in which Robert Mathews, leader of the violent racist cell called ``The Order,'' was killed following an 18-month wave of armed robberies and assassinations.

U.S. District Judge Edward Lodge gave Buie a reduced sentence of just a year behind bars, down from the standard sentencing range of 27 months to 33 months. That's after his lawyer, Mark Manweiler, argued that Buie's efforts to find sex-addiction treatment and his exemplary work record � as well as concern that as a longtime FBI agent he would be in danger behind bars � entitled him to a sentencing break.

"He would be unusually susceptible to abuse in a federal correctional institution,'' Manweiler wrote in his motion.

In a statement, the Justice Department said that as many as 150 sexually explicit images depicting children were found on Buie's home computers. It said no images were found on Buie's work computer.

After leaving the FBI, he worked as a criminal investigator for the Idaho attorney general's office for about six years, according to court documents.

According to terms of his sentencing, Buie must turn himself in on July 20 to begin serving his federal prison term.

Phone messages left by the Associated Press late Monday at Buie's Boise residence and on his cell phone weren't immediately returned.

SPOTSYLVANIA, Va. A former F-B-I analyst has been sentenced to seven years in prison for having sex with a young girl in Spotsylvania County.
Forty-four-year-old Anthony John Lesko entered an Alford plea yesterday in Spotsylvania County Circuit Court to nine counts of felony indecent liberties upon a child. An Alford plea means Lesko doesn't admit guilt but believes there is enough evidence for a conviction.

Under a plea agreement, he was sentenced to seven years in prison with another 15 years suspended. He also was ordered to pay ten-thousand dollars in restitution to cover the cost of the girl's mental-health counseling.

Authorities say Lesko engaged in a sex act with her nine times, beginning when she was nine years old.

Lesko's attorney says he worked as an intelligence analyst at the F-B-I for 17 years before moving to Jacksonville, Florida.

According to the plea, Lesko said he was a victim in the case. He said the girl initiated the contact.


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #2 

Investigator lobbied on day of DLNR vote

Hilton Lui approached Sen. Lorraine Inouye to tell her to oppose the DLNR's director

The state Ethics Commission says it has learned of more evidence indicating that an investigator showed bias while conducting a probe into alleged wrongdoing in the Bureau of Conveyances.

Ethics Commission Executive Director Dan Mollway outlined his concerns yesterday in a letter to lawmakers who are conducting their own investigation into the bureau.

The investigator, former FBI agent Hilton Lui, declined comment yesterday, saying he had just returned from Japan and had not had a chance to speak with his attorney.

Lui has been called to appear on Wednesday before a joint Senate-House investigative committee.

Lui also had been retained by the committee as its lead investigator, and Democratic leaders have said they want to hear from him before proceeding.

In yesterday's letter, Mollway said Lui openly displayed his opposition to the reappointment of former state Department of Land and Natural Resources Director Peter Young and lobbied a senator to vote against him on the day of the Senate's floor vote. The Bureau of Conveyances is a division of DLNR.

The senator whom Lui had lobbied was previously unnamed, but Mollway said yesterday it was Lorraine Inouye.

Mollway said Inouye told him this week that Lui called her as early as April to ask her to vote against Young's nomination.

Inouye also confirmed that Lui called her in April.

Inouye (D, Hilo-Honokaa) said she has known Lui for more than 30 years and that she did not know he was investigating the Bureau of Conveyances at the time he asked her to vote against Young.

"I would've raised the concern then," Inouye said yesterday. "I would just tell him that I think it's inappropriate that you're lobbying me because you are on a contract with the Ethics Commission."

Young's nomination was defeated by the Senate. Inouye voted in his favor.

The Bureau of Conveyances has been the subject of separate investigations by the Ethics Commission and the state attorney general's office, focusing on security of documents recorded with the bureau, computer access and overall operations of the agency

Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #3 
Librarians Describe Life Under an FBI Gag Order “Life in an FBI muzzle is no fun. Two Connecticut librarians on Sunday described what it was like to be slapped with an FBI national security letter (NSL) and accompanying gag order. It sounded like a spy movie or, gulp, something that happens under a repressive foreign government. Peter Chase and Barbara Bailey, librarians in Plainville, Connecticut, received an NSL ( to turn over computer records in their library on July 13, 2005. Unlike a suspected thousands of other people around the country, Chase, Bailey and two of their colleagues stood up to the Man and refused to comply, convinced that the feds had no right to intrude on anyone’s privacy without a court order (NSLs don’t require a judge’s approval). That’s when things turned ugly.” Wired (6/24/07)

Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #4 
                        THE FBI FRUHMENSCHEN PROGRAM
JSTOR Home      Skip to Main Content
The material you requested is included in JSTOR, an online journal archive made available to researchers through participating libraries and institutions.
This article is available for purchase from the publisher for $19.00 USD. However, the article may be available free of cost to you via your affiliation with a participating institution or individual access account. For more information about obtaining the complete article, please see Access Options. The citation and first page are available below.
Journal of Black Studies Cover Image
About the Journal
This journal is licensed to JSTOR by
Sage Publications, Inc.
The Federal Government and the Harassment of Black Leaders: A Case Study of Mayor Richard Arrington Jr. of Birmingham
Michele Wilson, John Lynxwiler
Journal of Black Studies, Vol. 28, No. 5 (May, 1998), pp. 540-560
This article consists of 21 page(s).
Enlarge Page Size
First page of requested article: The Federal Government and the Harassment of Black Leaders: A Case Study of Mayor Richard Arrington Jr. of Birmingham

Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #5 

Today's Must Read

Alberto Gonzales lied, the FBI spied.

In March, and again last month, the Justice Department's inspector general and internal FBI reviews found that the bureau repeatedly misused its Patriot-Act power to subpoena e-mail or financial records without court orders. But years before the reviews were completed -- and word of them became public -- Attorney General Gonzales knew that the abuses surrounding so-called National Security Letters existed. And yet this is what he told Congress on April 27, 2005: "There has not been one verified case of civil liberties abuse."

Reports the Washington Post:

The acts recounted in the FBI reports included unauthorized surveillance, an illegal property search and a case in which an Internet firm improperly turned over a compact disc with data that the FBI was not entitled to collect, the documents show. Gonzales was copied on each report that said administrative rules or laws protecting civil liberties and privacy had been violated.

The reports also alerted Gonzales in 2005 to problems with the FBI's use of an anti-terrorism tool known as a national security letter (NSL), well before the Justice Department's inspector general brought widespread abuse of the letters in 2004 and 2005 to light in a stinging report this past March.

Some of the mistakes sent to Gonzales's attention were egregious. In May 2005, an NSL containing an incorrect phone number allowed the FBI to wiretap a U.S. citizen that had nothing to do with the target of the bureau's investigation. An earlier slip-up authorized surveillance on a phone line after a court ordered the wiretapping stopped. In June 2006, the FBI sought to cover-up an "over-collection": when a superior agent learned of the mistake, he recommended going to bureau lawyers to see if there wasn't language in the NSL "that would cover the extra material." Many of the reports were serious enough to be sent as well to President Bush's Intelligence Oversight Board, which monitors civil-liberties abuses. (Some the FBI decided it was best the board didn't know about.)

Yet when DOJ Inspector General Glenn Fine released his March report into NSL abuses, Gonzales was shocked, shocked to learn that there was gambling with the counterterrorism rules in his fine establishment. Spokeswoman Tasia Scalinos told the Post in March that the AG "has ordered the FBI and the department to restore accountability and to put in place safeguards to ensure greater oversight and controls over the use of national security letters." An unnamed official described Gonzales as "incensed" to hear of the abuses. Again, this is years after Gonzales begin receiving alerts about FBI mistakes with Patriot and other counterterrorism powers -- alerts he appears to have received with some frequency. And not until March did Gonzales order FBI Director Bob Mueller to put new safeguards over NSLs in place.

So what's Gonzales's explanation? According to spokesman Brian Roehrkasse, "when Gonzales testified, he was speaking "in the context" of reports by the department's inspector general before this year that found no misconduct or specific civil liberties abuses related to the Patriot Act."

That context, it's now clear, was misleading. Other unnamed Justice officials used the tried-and-true standby that it's unclear if Gonzales ever read the repeated reports about abuse that he received. Roehrkasse bolstered the AG's case by saying that even if Gonzales messed up, so did his subordinates, as his assurances to Congress were "consistent with statements from other officials at the FBI and the department." Think that'll satisfy Patrick Leahy and John Conyers?


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #6 

        « Gonzales Knew About FBI Lawbreaking |         Main         | Security Researcher Wants Lube Maker Fined For Privacy Slip »


FBI Patriot Act Abuse Documents: What Special Project Lives in FBI HQ Room 4944?

By Ryan Singel EmailJuly 10, 2007 | 1:25:08 PMCategories: Privacy, Spooks Gone Wild, Sunshine and Secrecy                  

In March, the Justice Department's Inspector General revealed that FBI agents had sent a flurry of fake emergency letters to phone companies, asking them to turn over phone records immediately by promising that the proper papers had been filed with U.S. attorneys, though in many cases this was a complete lie.  More than 60 of these letters were made public today as part of a FBI document dump in response to a government sunshine lawsuit centered on the FBI's abuse of a key Patriot Act power.

The most striking thing about these expedited letters (.pdf) (made public via the Electronic Frontier Foundation) is that they all use the same pathetic, passive bureaucratese:  "Due to exigent circumstances, it is requested that records for the attached list of telephone numbers be provided." 

So far seem to all be coming from the same office: the Communications Analysis Group which looks to be located in Room 4944 in FBI Headquarters.  The "exigent letters" also refer almost exclusively to a "Special Project" and the only name on any of the letters is Larry Mefford.

Mefford was no rookie FBI agent. Mefford was the Executive Assistant Director, in charge of the Counterterrorism/Counterintelligence Division. In English, that means he was in charge of preventing another terrorist attack domestically.

What does that mean?  Well, Mefford's name is on documents that requested personal information on Americans.  Some of those requests included information known to be false to the agents signing them.  That's a federal crime, according to one former FBI agent.

What was this "Special Project" in the Communications Analysis Group?  What exactly were they doing that would require "expedited" letters that sometimes requested more than 2 pages of phone numbers from phone companies?  In the immortal words of the Butch Cassidy, who are those guys?

The documents also show that these "exigent letters" -- essentially end runs around the rules set up to keep the FBI from trampling on citizens rights -- weren't devised by some rogue Jack Bauer-style agent.  The form letters originated from inside FBI Headquarters and in some cases, bear the name of a senior level FBI offiicial who should have been aware of the letters' legal grey status and possibility for abuse.

The FBI is fully aware of the power handed to it by Congress's passage of the Patriot Act.  Indeed, as early as November 28, 2001, every field office was warned by the Office of the General Counsel that:

NSLs are powerful investigative tools in that they can compel the production of substantial amounts of relevant information. However, they must be used judiciously. [...]  In deciding whether or not to re-authorize the broadened authority, Congress certainly will examine the manner in which the FBI exercised it.  Executive Order 12333 and the FCIG require that the FBU accomplish its investigations through the "least intrusive " means.  Supervisors should keep this in mind when deciding whether or not a particular use of NSL authority is appropriate.  The greater availability of NSLs does not mean that they should be used in every case.

From the looks of the audits coming out, that seems to be one memo FBI agents dutifully ignored.  And perhaps rightfully so, since Congress didn't bother to challenge Alberto Gonzales's knowingly false statements to Congress about the FBI's use of these powers before they made them permanent.


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #7 

Concerns Raised Over FBI Spy Scheme
Privacy experts are raising alarm bells about a new FBI program that would pay private companies to hold millions of phone and Internet records the FBI is barred from keeping itself. Companies would be responsible for at least two years of network calling records. The program would allow the FBI to skirt laws banning the collection of data not directly connected to a criminal investigation or intelligence matter. The proposed companies involved are Verizon, MCI and AT&T.


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #8 

FBI Employees Face Criminal Probe Over Patriot Act Abuse

Ryan Singel Email 07.12.07 | 2:00 AM

FBI personnel who used misleading emergency letters to acquire thousands of Americans' phone records are the subject of a criminal investigation, top bureau officials told civil liberties groups Monday.

The unprecedented criminal probe, revealed at an outreach meeting led by FBI director Robert Mueller and general counsel Valerie Caproni at FBI headquarters, is looking at the actions of an antiterrorism team known as the Communications Analysis Unit, according to two people who attended the meeting independently and who informed Wired News, requesting anonymity.

The privately disclosed investigation would mark the first time government officials have faced possible prosecution for misuse of Patriot Act investigative tools, and highlights the seriousness of recent reports about the FBI's misuse of a powerful self-issued subpoena known as a National Security Letter.

Unit employees, who are not authorized to request records in investigations, sent form letters to telephone companies to acquire detailed billing information on specific phone numbers by falsely promising that subpoenas were already in the works.

According to a third source, FBI officials also said at the meeting that some bureau employees have already been granted immunity from prosecution in the investigation. The third source, who also spoke on condition of anonymity, did not recall, however, that FBI officials described the investigation as "criminal."

FBI spokesman Richard Kolko confirmed that the meeting took place but declined to comment on the content of the conversation, saying only, "The FBI does not confirm or deny investigations."

Neither the Justice Department's Office of the Inspector General nor the FBI's Office of Professional Responsibility returned calls for comment.

While the scope of the alleged investigation is unknown, investigators could be examining whether the unit violated the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, or committed fraud by falsely swearing that subpoenas were being prepared.

National Security Letters are self-issued subpoenas that allow investigators in terrorism and espionage cases to require phone companies, banks, credit reporting agencies and internet service providers to turn over records on Americans considered "relevant" to an investigation. Those records are then fed into three computer systems, including a shared data-mining tool known as the Investigative Data Warehouse.

Though warned in 2001 to use this power sparingly, FBI agents issued more than 47,000 National Security Letters in 2005, more than half of which targeted Americans.

Justice Department officials, including Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, have downplayed the gravity of the reported errors while attempting to mollify critics by promising to strengthen internal oversight.

The Communications Analysis Unit, part of the FBI's Communications Exploitation Section based in the agency's headquarters building, is tasked with analyzing terrorist communications and providing intelligence to the FBI's Counterterrorism Division. However, because it only supports investigators, unit employees cannot issue subpoenas and instead need to have counterterrorism investigators do so.

However, the Justice Department's Inspector General reported (.pdf) in March that the office issued 739 "exigent letters" to AT&T, Verizon and MCI seeking information on more than 3,000 phone numbers. The letters stated: "Due to exigent circumstances, it is requested that records for the attached list of telephone numbers be provided. Subpoenas requesting this information have been submitted to the U.S. Attorney's Office who will process and serve them formally to (Phone Company Name) as expeditiously as possible."

However, no such subpoenas had been filed with U.S. Attorneys and only later were some of the requests followed up with proper legal process, according to the Inspector General's report.

Several of the letters included requests for records for more than 100 phone numbers.

Bassem Youssef, the current head of the Communications Analysis Unit, told Congress in March that key FBI lawyers knew about the problem in 2005, when he notified them and put an end to the false letters.

Youssef first noticed the problem with the letters in 2005 when he took over the unit and quickly brought the matter to the attention of his supervisor and the FBI's Office of the General Counsel, according to a March letter (.pdf) sent by his lawyer, Stephen Kohn, to Sen. Chuck Grassley.

"At all times, the (National Security Law Branch) and the FBI (Office of the General Counsel) knew that the field offices and operational units were non-compliant in obtaining the legal documentation," Kohn wrote.

Youssef is currently suing the FBI for retaliating against him for complaining that the bureau was wasting his Arabic-language skills and antiterrorism experience. He attempted to get proper National Security Letters filed to provide post-facto legal backing for the exigent letters but was hampered by uncooperative field offices, according to the Senate letter.

Kohn did not respond to requests for comment.


Posts: 87
Reply with quote  #9 
So much for the FBI lovefest.

How about posting some stuff on the corruption regarding Homeland Security who's just as bad as the FBI and a lot larger?

Gang Stalking is sanctioned by the FBI and many policing agencies, who maintain a hands off approach to this hate crime. It is indicative of the fascist shadow government that now controls this country.

Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #10 
Debating "The Camden 28"
A scholar and an activist discuss a new film about the Catholic Left
By James T. Fisher and Edward Murphy | SEPTEMBER 17, 2007
the cover of America, the Catholic magazine

Editors' note: The Camden 28, which airs Tuesday September 11 at 10 pm on most PBS stations, tells the story of the 28 activists who were arrested in 1971 for conspiring to break into a draft facility in Camden, New Jersey and destroy records. Among the group were many members of the Catholic Left, including several priests. To shed more light on this moment in history, we asked two people to view the film and discuss it via email. James T. Fisher is the co-director of the Curran Center for American Catholic Studies at Fordham University and a native of New Jersey. Edward Ned Murphy, S.J., was one of the defendants in the Camden 28 trial and now works at Part of the Solution (POTS), a soup kitchen in the Bronx.

Spoiler alert: this discussion addresses some historical facts that are only gradually revealed over the course of the film.

Father Ned,

My first of numerous surely off-center reflections on Anthony Giacchinos valuable documentary, The Camden 28: as a Jersey guy, it was very good to see the Garden States contribution to the Catholic peace movement honored! There is actually a genuine issue here beyond the boosterism: treatments of this movement and this era nearly always begin and end with a nod to the Berrigan brothers and their role in events at places like Catonsville that now enjoy a kind of canonical status in U.S. Catholic history. So I am especially appreciative for The Camden 28 as a film that highlights a story that was both deeply local yet linked via themes and participants to this broader dynamic movement.

Because you are one of the non-local figures among the Camden 28, it would be good to learn how you came to be involved in this particular act of witness. Some of my best friends are from Camden and the blue-collar suburbs to its north and east: these are some real characters deeply grounded in an environment that notably borders on the astonishing beauty and isolation of the Pine Barrens whose role in the formation of local culture should not be overlooked. I was reminded of these rugged characters by the South Jersey/Philly accents of several figures--especially Bob Hardy, the F.B.I. informant that viewers will surely find the most puzzling if not compelling subject in the film.

Hardys astonishing role in this story prompts one question that has recurred over the years: why was the Catholic Left so politically naive By 1971 the secular Left was well-versed in the F.B.I.s infiltration and entrapment techniques--which is not to say it was immune--but as we were reminded again in The Camden 28, the Catholic version featured this extraordinarily innocent streak, raising questions about its origins and background in a church whose structures of authority seemed really to complicate challenges to vested systems of all kinds.

The other side of this innocence is very powerfully represented in the 28s loving and compassionate response to the death of informer Bob Hardys son Billy in a terrible accident. Then later the pastoral intervention of Fr. Mick Doyle--one of the 28 and a central figure as a Camden priest--with Hardy and his family is part of process that leads to a very powerful discernment on Bob Hardys part.

Here are a few historical/political questions followed by some reflections on the film as film. Do you have any sense of why only one (Joan Reilly) of the dozen or so women participants in the 28 has any substantial screen time? There is a reference in the film to a dinner whose male-dominated character evoked The Last Supper. The secular Lefts gender issues have been widely treated, but we don?t have much on the Catholic version.

Father Mick Doyle is surely Irish-born--were you born in the NYC area Do you think there were any echoes of Irish causes/traditions in events in Camden I was struck by the caper film tone of the historical reconstructions around the Camden fed building, which in turn reminded me of some Irish rebel lore. The reconstructions also have that Zapruder film/Oliver Stone quality which by now can be as distracting as entertaining/illuminating.

The reunion motif is becoming a familiar feature of documentaries that treat communal events like that of the Camden 28 action and trial. The technique as deployed here is moving and often effective, though wed still like to know more about groups inner dynamics unmediated by gauze of nostalgia, poignant as it is. I imagine viewers might be especially interested in your role in the production: how you came to be interviewed, what was cut, and how you felt about overall process. There is a warm tone to the film that is quite touching; for some reason these '60s/70s historically themed-films often leave me a touch sad. I was also left with sense that some of the Camden 28's less central figures would have been among the best to hear from and theres something lost by their absence. Do you know much about those we dont hear from or learn about in film

Thanks Ned and best wishes from Jim

Dear Jim,

First of all, thank you for your reflections. As you pointed out, I was not a local. My roots, though, are inner city. I am what was once called a BIC--a Bronx, Irish Catholic. I was born in 1937 and so grew up in the 40s and 50s, when we were not only proud members of the Church Triumphant, we were also proud citizens of America Triumphant. It was a time of certainty both theologically and politically. The road to Camden, therefore, was geographically not a long one, but uncharted miles away theologically and politically.

More immediately, the story of how I came to Camden is the story of our community--the community which has often been called the Catholic Left but which we always referred to simply as the "action community." Seen by the F.B.I. as a rather highly structured organization with known leaders and by some of the peace movement as an amorphous group of pious do-gooders, we were neither. Rather we were a totally unstructured community of people who shared a very reasoned political analysis and a spiritual (not religious) dynamism which came from a commitment to the values articulated in the Gospel. We did not always share the same understanding of the person of Jesus, although the overwhelming majority of us came from a Catholic Christian background.

In 1971 I was working for the Harrisburg Defense Committee as were many of the action community. We thought it would give us a platform to explain who we were and what we were about. The workings of the Harrisburg 7 trial, however, did not give us as much of an opportunity to do this as we had hoped. So when I received a call from Peter Fordi--another Jesuit member of the 28--saying that there was a community in Camden that was preparing to do an action and needed help, I was anxious to go. This was our way of operating. If help was needed whoever was available would respond. In the normal course several people would surface after the action and take credit for it. The rest would go back to their work. The presence of Bob Hardy, however, enabled the F.B.I. to name and arrest everyone who was involved. Which brings us to the subject of Bob Hardy.

I have heard for over 35 years about the naivet of the Catholic Left. I do not want to sound defensive but I do not think it is a fair description. We were, indeed, an open community. We attended one anothers trials and often celebrated together. We were a natural for infiltration. The fact is that, to the best of our knowledge, we were never infiltrated. Which is to say that the F.B.I. never inserted an agent into our community. In our case it was a trusted friend and member of the community who chose to go to the F.B.I. Id like to point out that if Bob Hardys intention was simply to protect his friends, as he says in the film, he could have stood up and said that any further planning would force him to go to the F.B.I. and we would have aborted the action immediately. As you point out in your reflection, Jim, the Camden 28s treatment of Hardy, especially at the tragic death of his son, is a true example of non-violence.

The gender issue was indeed an ongoing cause of concern for the action community. I remember one former nun saying at a meeting that she did not leave one male-dominated hierarchy for another and I knew what she meant. I would not attempt to speak for the women of Camden 28, but I do know that the gender issue was alive among us and often openly discussed. Personally, I am very grateful to some of the women of the Catholic Left who shared their concerns and their feminist analysis with this Jesuit and who never gave up on me. Off the top of my head I think of Mary Moylan, Ann Walsh and Judy Peluso, and 28ers Anne Dunham, Lianne Moscia and Cookie Ridolfi.

I asked Anthony Giacchino, the director, why there were not other women featured in the film. He said that in the interviewing phase his budget was severely limited and Joan Reilly was available in the area and willing to talk at length, and that other women (and men) chose not to participate.

I loved your observation about the ring of Irish rebel lore that sounds in the reconstruction of the action. I smiled when I read it and realized its accuracy, even though many of the 28 did not have Irish rebel backgrounds. But I can tell you that I am sure it brought a smile to my rebel Irish mother. I was reared on such stories--the jailbreak from Kilkenny prison, the Tans searching the house for guns, and on and on.

I hope I have not been overly partisan, but then how could I not be I thoroughly enjoyed the film. It brought back wonderful memories of a loving community. The love was always present as we laughed and cried and discussed and disagreed and argued vehemently. What power there was in that loving community has shaped all I have tried to do since.

Much love to you,
Ned Murphy

Check back Tuesday for Part 2 of the discussion.

James T. Fisher is the co-director of the Curran Center for American Catholic Studies at Fordham University. Edward Ned Murphy, S.J., was one of the defendants in the Camden 28 trial and now works at Part of the Solution (POTS), a soup kitchen in the Bronx.

Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #11 

U.S. Sen. Grassley: Questions FBI on more alleged retaliation against whistleblowers

WASHINGTON – Senator Chuck Grassley has again reminded the FBI that the law does not allow retaliation against government whistleblowers.  Grassley reiterated his concerns to FBI Director Robert Mueller in a letter sent yesterday.

The Senator’s letter forwards allegations of retaliation against FBI Agent Bassem Youssef, chief of the Communications Analysis Unit.  Youssef is the highest ranking Arab-American in the FBI.  After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Youssef raised concerns within the FBI that he, as one of the highest ranking Arabic-speaking agents, was not being assigned to cases related to the attacks. 

        “It seems like every time I turn around, there’s another allegation of whistleblower retaliation at the FBI.  It appears to be second nature for them,” Grassley said.  “Director Mueller has talked often about the fact that he won’t tolerate retaliation, but it doesn’t look like the message is getting through to his management team.”

        Grassley is a senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and has conducted oversight of the FBI since the mid 1990s. 

        Here is a copy of the letter to Mueller.  A copy of the signed letter along with the attachment can be found on Grassley’s website at http://grassley.senate.gov.

Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #12 

PostSecret Site Shut Down Over National Security

by Dood Abides

Web archived copy of post card submission which reportedly resulted in website shutdown
Web archived copy of post card submission which reportedly resulted in website shutdown

Washington, DC (UPSI) - Thousands of fans worldwide were stunned to find today that the popular ongoing artistic experimental website PostSecret had been shut down overnight and replaced by a heretofore unknown blogger profile simply called "Nicole". Rumors have spread that the website was shut down over concerns of national security, but spokespersons for the White House, Department of Justice, FBI, and the CIA have steadfastly refused to confirm the allegations.

When news of the site shut down broke early this morning, bloggers began combing readily available archival content online, and many insist that they have found a posting from early February 2007 which may be responsible. The postcard in question depicts President Bush in a boat fishing with his father, the former President, and scrawled across the picture is the phrase, "I miss the way I used to feel." On the reverse of the card and in the same handwriting are two simple sentences: "I made a horrible mistake when we envaded(sic) Iraq. I'm sorry".

Handwriting analysts have compared the text with the president's infamous handwritten "bathroom break memo" from a UN meeting in 2005, and have declared the postcard to be a match within 98% certainty.

PostSecret was established as an ongoing social/artistic experiment in which people are encouraged to submit their darkest secrets under conditions of anonymity. Created by Frank Warren, it has displayed upwards of 2500 miniature works of art from people in the United States and across the world. Warren had recently begun branching out into YouTube with a new experimental "PostSecret Mini-Movie".

Warren today vowed to "continue the experiment in whatever capacity". "It is very liberating to finally be able to reveal that the problems at the website were due to ongoing secret FBI investigations since July of this year. Secrets are toxic, and this has been once again demonstrated to me firsthand. The spirit of the site remains intact, and anyone, no matter their stature or occupation in life should have the benefit of confession."


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #13 

This is important information.
Back in the 1970's the CIA  approached Yuri Geller, the Israeli born pyschic spoon bender and asked if he would cooperate in an experiment to stop pigs hearts from beating.
A paradigm shifting book called PSYCHIC WARRIOR lays out the CIA  Stargate program in detail. Written by Colonel David Morehouse, a participant in the program he has gone on to lead workshops teaching people what he learned in the program.
Several years ago he was a keynote speaker at the annual Psychotronics association conference. I highly recommend the video they made of his 3 hour presentation  see

Revealed: CIA Allegedly Transferred STAR GATE to Spy Agency
Gary S. Bekkum


Gary S. Bekkum is an independent 'occasional' rogue journalist & web author, and researcher of material that blurs the distinction between fiction and reality.

In 2004 Bekkum initiated Starstream Research, as an informal survey of exotic physics and consciousness concepts related to the survival or otherwise of the human race. Building from an international network of contacts in science and the defense industry, some of the Starstream Research material is available to the public at STARpod.org.

As a result of his efforts, Bekkum has reported numerous contacts with past and present intelligence officials interested in the application of exotic phenomena, ranging from antigravity to mind-to-mind communication.

 Gary S. Bekkum
September 16, 2007
 Several sources, including investigative journalist Gus Russo, are reporting America's psychic spy program is alive and well, hidden in the depths of the National Security Agency.

Gus Russo is the author of several books including "Live by the Sword: The Secret War Against Castro and the Death of JFK." Russo has worked as an investigative reporter for PBS's Frontline and ABC News. In a story published in June of this year, Russo examined the "Real X-Files" behind the infiltration of government intelligence agencies into networks of investigative citizen journalists interested in exotic phenomena, like UFOs and parapsychology.

According to information provided by an independent source to Gus Russo, the STAR GATE psychic spy project "was relocated from CIA and is one of the most highly classified at NSA."

In 1995, the CIA inherited STAR GATE, a top-secret psychic spy program run by the Defense Intelligence Agency. STAR GATE has become the nickname for numerous government programs, beginning in 1972, that explored and applied human mental powers to collect intelligence. Many spy agencies were involved in STAR GATE, or similar projects, including the CIA, DIA, the USAF, the Navy, Army Intelligence and Missile Command, Secret Service, The Joint Chiefs of Staff, and others.

Another agency known to have been involved was the National Security Agency (NSA).

CIA killed the STAR GATE program in 1995, shortly after a Congressional Mandate transfered control of the program from DIA. Several years later, approximately 89,000 pages of STAR GATE documents were released to the public, many heavily redacted with sections or entire pages removed or censored in black.

Sources are telling Starstream Research that America's psychic spy efforts continue today as part of the war on terror.

Gus Russo's source told him "NSA considers remote viewing a valid SIGINT tool."

Remote viewing refers to the use of mental powers to perform psychic spying -- the use of extra-sensory perceptions of the human mind to access information not available to ordinary senses.

In the Intelligence Community, the National Security Agency "collects, processes and disseminates foreign Signals Intelligence (SIGINT)."

According to the NSA web site, "SIGINT plays a vital role in our national security by employing the right people and using the latest technology to provide America's leaders with the critical information they need to save lives, defend democracy, and promote American values."

If Russo's source is correct, SIGINT now includes exotic phenomenology for intelligence collection. Government persons and citizens interested in exotic phenomena are sometimes called phenomenologists.

In addition to Russo's source, another unrelated former government scientist told Caryn Anscomb, a contributing investigator for Starstream Research, of a "deep black" psychic spy program.

One possible explanation for a current NSA program is found in 1994 briefings given to various intelligence agencies, including Andy Marshall at the Pentagon's Office of Net Assessment.

A year before CIA killed the STAR GATE project, DIA documents show renewed interest in Russian phenomenology, with the discovery of a possible signal-carrying mechanism for psychic phenomena. STAR GATE scientific research was conducted by defense contractor Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). The final SAIC report mentions various possible mechanisms for signal transmission.

The NSA is conspicuously absent from later-day STAR GATE documents. Incomplete redacting, which is the blacking out of sensitive information, appears to identify a representative from NSA in at least one of the 1994 DIA briefing documents.

If a transmission mechanism was discovered during STAR GATE research, psychic spying would change from HUMINT (human intelligence sources) to SIGINT (signal intelligence sources).

Gus Russo's unnamed source reports strange new developments at the NSA program. According to Russo, "The source says the program encountered problems when when foreign targets were being blocked by an extraterrestrial source that has never been identified."

STAR GATE files prove that DIA psychic spies reported encounters with extraterrestrials during the 1980's. Documents stamped with official CIA declassification ID numbers include drawings of biological entities and descriptions of their locations on Earth, and in space.

Investigator Caryn Anscomb asked Russo to rate the credibility of his human source for the latest NSA revelation. Russo replied, "His speculations are sometimes further than I would go ... But his accuracy re: facts has never been in question."

Some of the most vocal opponents to the possible existence of the NSA psychic-spy program worked with the original STAR GATE projects.

Paul H. Smith, a former DIA source, is the President of IRVA -- the International Remote Viewing Association -- an organization comprised of veterans of previous government programs and next generation private sector psychics. When asked about the NSA program, Smith replied, "If there still actually is one, I have no info on it."

Colonel John B. Alexander, retired, a well known advocate for non-lethal weapons, told Coast to Coast AM host George Noory he doubted the government was currently involved in remote viewing.

"The talent pool is really relatively small ... and most of these people all know each other."

Russo told Starstream Research the NSA remote viewers had received special university-level training.

A major security breach occurred in 1973 when, according to numerous accounts, SRI remote viewers Pat Price and Ingo Swann spied on NSA's Sugar Grove facility in West Virginia.

The tale of this incident was told by CIA's Ken Kress in a 1999 revised version of a formerly secret story written for CIA's internal "Studies in Intelligence," and is recorded in detail in the STAR GATE SRI Final Report for January 1974 to February 1975.

Kress writes, "No maps were permitted, and the subjects were asked to give an immediate response of what they remotely viewed at these coordinates. The subject came back with descriptions which were apparent misses. They both talked about a military-like facility ... To the surprise of the [CIA] OSI officer, he soon discovered a sensitive government installation a few miles from the vacation property. This discovery led to a request to have Price provide information concerning the interior workings of this particular site. All the data produced by the two subjects were reviewed in CIA and the Agency [NSA] concerned."

"Pat Price, who had no military or intelligence background, provided a list of project titles associated with current and past activities including one of extreme sensitivity. Also, the codename of the site was provided. Other information concerning the physical layout of the site was accurate. Some information, such as the names of the people at the site, proved incorrect."

Pages from the SRI report are available for viewing at the Starstream Research web sites.

A few years later, following Price's death, it was alleged by the FBI that Price had been passing information about the SRI research to a private organization. Kress addressed this incident in the 1999 public version of his CIA article:

"In the late 1970s, several years after the project was terminated, I got a secure line call from a person who identified himself as an FBI agent ... The FBI agent proceeded to explain that Pat Price was a member of an organization that was recently raided for documents indicative of illegal activity. The organization was vigorously resisting the government investigation but the raid produced hundreds of files and papers that supported the government ’s allegations. These documents were now in the public domain as part of the discovery process in the legal proceedings. One such file included debriefings of Pat Price about his CIA remote viewing projects ... As the file made clear, Pat, who had signed an official secrecy agreement, would immediately go to his superior in the organization after sessions with me and divulge everything."


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #14 

Guidelines on FBI Confidential Sources

Late last year the Attorney General approved revised guidelines for the use of confidential informants by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (pdf).

The guidelines require that confidential human sources be subjected to a new validation process to help ensure that their information is reliable.

The guidelines also generally require that the FBI and prosecutors inform responsible law enforcement authorities if they discover that an FBI source is engaged in "unauthorized criminal activity."

"The FBI does not have any authority to make any promise or commitment that would prevent the government from prosecuting a Confidential Human Source for criminal activity that is not authorized....."

See "Attorney General Guidelines Regarding the Use of FBI Confidential Human Sources," approved December 13, 2006.

The Guidelines were included in voluminous FBI answers to questions for the record of a recently published Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on "FBI Oversight," December 6, 2006 (14 MB PDF file).


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #15 

Wanted: A Whitey story that stays hot

                                                                                                                                                                By Peter Gelzinis
                                        Friday, September 21, 2007 -
                                                                                        + Recent Articles                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
        EmailE-mail          PrintablePrintable          Comments(1) Comments           LargerSmallerText size          ShareShare         Rate(5) Rate

It wasn’t her lilting accent, or the way she formally introduced herself as an “Italian journaleeest,” that endeared me to Flaminia Lubin’s phone message.

No, it was how she managed to step on Whitey Bulger’s last name with such polite grace and civility that made me smile.

“I would like, very much, to speak to you about Mr. James Bulgar,” Flaminia said, using the same hard “g” that enables Bulger to rhyme so perfectly with vulgar.

It brought back memories of the day President Bill Clinton came to town and dropped a hard “g” right on the head of Whitey’s little brother. “And I want to thank your Senate president, Bill . . . Bulgar,” Clinton said before a Park Plaza congregation of high hacks.

I still wonder if Billbo invoked the hard “g”as a way to cut our Napoleon down a few pegs. I’m guessing he did, but then I digress.

Flaminia Lubin wanted me to know that for a few days last week, our favorite long-lost gangster was bigger in Italy than he is aroundAndrew Square at the moment.

“This story has some, how do say, interest over there. When the (Italian) people hear that someone on the same list with Osama bin Laden could be walking around oh, yes, it was a big story.”

Then guess what happened. “After the Italian authorities did their best job, trying to find Mr. James Bulgar,” Flaminia said, “and they could not find him, the story, it went very cold after a few days.”

Even with a lovely Italian accent, doesn’t that sound awfully familiar?

Flaminia Lubin, who’s lived in New York for the last 20 years with her husband and family, works as a freelance producer for RAI, or National Italian Television. At the moment, she is trying to put together a segment on Whitey for the Italian version of “America’s Most Wanted.”

“It’s called ‘Chi l’ha visto?” she said, “which in English would be ‘Who Saw Him?’ The first story on Mr. James Bulgar was quite popular on Italian television and it drew a large audience. But when the police could not find him and there were no stories to follow, it disappeared quite quickly.”

So, Flaminia has been dispatched to pump some life into the story by giving her countrymen a portrait of our miserable old refugee. Meanwhile, I was more interested in learning what folks in the birthplace of La Cosa Nostra thought of an Irish gangster who made his fortune by ratting out Italians to the FBI. On the ancient streets of Rome or Sicily, I wondered whether the locals really believed the FBI wanted to capture their prize stool pigeon any more than we did?

“Right now, let me tell you that Italians, they could care less about if the FBI really looks for Mr. Bulgar,” Flaminia explained. “They have so many problems in Italy now, that wondering if the FBI will catch Mr. Bulgar this is the least of their problems. But, yes, they will pay some attention if they believe that someone like Mr. James Bulgar may be in Italy, living among them.”

He’s not - at least not anymore. If Whitey Bulger ever was in Italy, you can be sure he left shortly after the G-men gumshoes came through with another one of their classic head starts. Flaminia Lubin explained that it was FBI agents in Italy who approachedproducers of “Chi l’ha visto?” with the latest video of a Whitey Bulger with more hair and a different jaw line. Good thing they did, or else we’d forget they were ever looking.

Funny how that piece of video went global around the time of the White Man’s 77th birthday. As we all know, there are two days every year when a handful of people turn their tired eyes toward an old psychopath: Whitey’s birthday, and the anniversary of that January day in 1995, when he ran away leaving Kevin Weeks, Steve “The Rifleman” Flemmi and G-man John Connolly holding the bag.

As for the remaining 363 days, Whitey is simply one vulgar old man tucked away in the shadows.


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #16 
the narcosphere        
Bogotá Connection ’Informant’ Baruch Vega Sues U.S. Government
By Bill Conroy,
Posted on Mon Sep 24th, 2007 at 12:06:27 AM EST
A key figure in exposing alleged U.S. law enforcement corruption in Colombia has just filed a multi-million dollar lawsuit that promises to be quite embarrassing for the U.S. government — and revealing to those of us who don’t quite buy our aloof leadership’s Plan Colombia vision.

In that lawsuit, filed in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in Washington, D.C., Baruch Vega claims that the U.S. government owes him $28.5 million for services he provided in an operation that helped the U.S. government net 114 Colombian narco-trafficking targets.

From Vega’s lawsuit, filed on Sept. 21:

In or about 1996 and 1997, [Vega] became a documented confidential informant for the United States of America, specifically, two federal law enforcement agencies, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) and later, for the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”). … Mr. Vega was not a traditional informant and his methodology was anything but parochial. Mr. Vega engineered a plan/program that proved to be innovative and very successful.

Mr. Vega would play and later, in fact did play, the role of an intermediary (or broker) between Colombian drug traffickers, some then unknown (and thus, unidentified) to U.S. law enforcement, others already identified (by their real names or nicknames as “suspects”) by U.S. law enforcement and, others already indicted, for drug trafficking and/or money laundering charges in various federal districts across the United States of America.

Vega’s plan, as explained in his pleadings, involved what might best be described as an elaborate, U.S. government-sanctioned extortion scheme. Vega, “at great danger to himself,” approached Colombian narco-traffickers and convinced them to “negotiate their criminal exposure” with the U.S. government rather than waiting to be indicted, arrested and extradited,” Vega claims in his litigation.

More from Vega’s lawsuit:

Once Mr. Vega introduced … American lawyers to the Colombian targets [the narco-traffickers], the lawyers would then get retained and then take over as legal representatives for the Colombian targets and further deal with a group of United States law enforcement agents and prosecutors, hand-picked to work out deals for the Colombian targets. A particular United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida became the coordinator of this “recruiting effort.”

Vega claims in the litigation that as part of this extortion scheme, FBI and DEA agents would initially meet with the Colombian narco-trafficking targets in Panama for introductions, eventual debriefings and finally to work out the details of proposed plea agreements.

“There were many of these types of meetings in Panama over a period of several years,” Vega alleges in the lawsuit. “… The plan/program was extremely successful. All in all, Mr. Vega convinced and successfully recruited about 114 Colombian targets to enter this plan/program, about 25 of which were fugitives at the time of negotiating the deals.

”Within the past seven years alone, there were 35 such Colombian targets who reached deals with the United States.” [A list of names can be found at the end of this story.]

Big Picture

Vega’s remarkable claims in his litigation must be set against the larger context of corruption allegations that have been exposed in Narco News’ prior reporting about U.S. law enforcement operations in Colombia.

This Bogotá Connection was revealed in a series of government documents uncovered by Narco News, including an internal U.S. Justice Department document known as the Kent memo, which advances detailed allegations of a criminal conspiracy involving corrupt U.S. law enforcers who operated in league with key Colombian narco-traffickers.

Vega was very involved with some of the U.S. law enforcement operations referenced in the Kent memo. Those particular operations played out between 1997 and 2000 and sought to snare narco-traffickers with Colombia’s infamous North Valley Cartel.

Vega claims that corrupt U.S. agents that are part of the Bogotá Connection seriously compromised his role as a government asset and that a number of his informants within Colombia’s narco-trafficking underworld were assassinated as a result.

Vega also contends that he has intimate knowledge of the alleged corruption outlined in the Kent memo.

Justice Department attorney Thomas M. Kent wrote the memo in late 2004 in an effort to draw attention to alleged serious corruption within the U.S. Embassy in Colombia. In the memo, Kent alleges that DEA agents in Bogotá assisted narco-traffickers, engaged in money laundering, and conspired to murder informants.

The first of the major allegations in Kent’s memo centers on a DEA undercover operation launched in Colombia in 1997 called Cali-Man, which made use of Vega as an asset. The operation was overseen by David Tinsley, a DEA group supervisor in Miami.

As part of that operation, Tinsley and the agents working under him uncovered evidence that DEA agents in Bogotá appeared to be assisting narco-traffickers in Colombia.

But in late January 2000, Bogotá DEA chief Leo Arreguin shot off a memo to DEA headquarters. The charges raised in that memo led to Tinsley’s operations being shut down that same year, including Cali-Man and another investigation called Rainmaker — which was zeroing in on the alleged DEA corruption in Bogotá.

Arreguin’s memo, which was addressed to the DEA’s chief of international operations, questioned the integrity of Vega and his so-called “extortion scheme.”

The Arreguin memo prompted an internal agency investigation targeting Tinsley and one of the agents under his watch (Lawrence Castillo) who was Vega’s in-the-field handler.

As a result of the investigation prompted by Arreguin’s memo, Tinsley was suspended and eventual dismissed from his job.

The DEA Bogota chief’s memo also put into motion a major criminal investigation targeting Vega, Tinsley and Castillo. The investigation was undertaken by two green FBI agents initially in coordination with the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Miami. The agents, according to sources, thought they were onto something big, but had no idea that their own agency was operating Vega as an asset and had authorized the extortion scheme — without making Tinsley and the Cali-man undercover operation aware of that fact.

Vega was never criminally prosecuted for engaging in the extortion scheme, however. Instead, he was convicted on a misdemeanor charge for not paying taxes on some of the money he allegedly earned from the scheme (which he claims was conducted with the approval of and in coordination with the U.S. government) and received a four-month jail sentence.

In addition, Tinsley and Castillo were cleared of all criminal charges with respect to Vega’s use of the so-called extortion scheme. Tinsley also brought a claim of wrongful termination before a U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) judge, who, in April 2004, ruled in his favor and ordered the DEA to reinstate him — with back pay, plus interest.

Sources tell Narco News those facts demonstrate that the extortion scheme was sanctioned by the government, which Vega also now asserts in his litigation.

The judge’s ruling in Tinsley’s MSPB case includes some very specific details about the activities of Vega, who in his other life was a high-profile fashion photographer. Those details confirm that the DEA, FBI as well as the CIA all were utilizing Vega in operations targeting narco-traffickers in Colombia.

From the MSPB judge’s ruling:

… The appellant [Tinsley] testified that, at the request of the FBI, he wanted the bare minimum of a paper trail for Mr. Vega. Both the DEA and FBI used Vega as a confidential source. The FBI specified that Vega would be a "non-testifier.” That is, he would never be used to testify in criminal trials. This status was necessary because Vega was called a “FCI-CI” or Foreign Counterintelligence Service Confidential Informant, who had been brought in by the CIA. As the appellant [Tinsley] put it, “I'm having my agents cut him out every chance they can. I don't want him documented. I don't want him in our Case File any more than we have to."

The trips to Panama at issue here were confidential source recruiting trips. The plan was for Mr. Vega to “introduce” SA Castillo [a DEA agent working under Tinsley] to drug traffickers and then to get out of there, so he would be in no position to have to testify regarding what conversations, if any, took place. For that reason, it was the appellant's [Tinsley's] judgment that few DEA-6s [reports] were required regarding Mr. Vega because Vega was a non-testifier, and, moreover, his activities did not yield investigative leads. And, as stated previously, at least one classified DEA-6 was prepared and was kept under lock and key in the Miami SAC's [special agent in charge’s] safe in order to safeguard the information contained therein….

The Cover-up

After Narco News exposed the Kent memo in a story published on Jan. 9, 2006, DEA reacted by describing the corruption allegations in that memo as “extremely serious.”

However, some nine days later, after Semana, a popular weekly magazine in Colombia, published a story about the Kent memo, DEA issued another public statement describing the corruption allegations as “unfounded.”

The U.S. mainstream media has been silent about the Kent memo, and the Bogotá Connection, since that time.

But Vega now appears to be forcing both the government and the compliant agenda-setting media to confront the Bogotá Connection through the U.S. court system.

From Vega’s lawsuit:

The economic (and non-economic) benefits to the United States in bringing all of the Colombian targets to justice is mind boggling. The United States obtained over a hundred federal drug convictions. Much of the cooperation of the Colombian targets itself resulted in other investigations, prosecutions and convictions — something akin to a “domino effect.” In varying degrees, these targets forfeited cash, real estate, jewelry and art in an estimated total amount somewhere between $250 million and $500 million.

… Accordingly, Mr. Vega seeks a $250,000 payment for each of the 114 cases he made for the United States and therefore, seeks a total sum of $28,500,000.

That’s a lot of money on the line for the U.S. government — in reality, the U.S. taxpayers’ money collected via the so-called war on drugs.

U.S. government attorneys can always choose to duke it out in court with Vega and prove that his allegations are “unfounded.”

However, by engaging Vega in that legal battle, the U.S. government also takes the risk that his “extremely serious” allegations are, in fact, true and that even more of the Bogotá Connection will be exposed to the sanitizing heat of sunlight.

The government has until Nov. 23 to file an answer to Vega’s legal complaint.

Vega, for his part, appears quite ready to play this game of roulette with the U.S. government. As he told Narco News previously: “It’s all a wheel … eventually my side will be up.”

Oh, and here’s that promised list — filed as an exhibit in Vega’s lawsuit, which can be found at this link:

List of Drug traffickers surrendered and cooperating sources recruited between 1997 to 2000


1. Arturo Piza
2. Oscar Grisales
3. Julio Fierro
4. John Castro (Jimmy Aloja “Mijares”)
5. Jairo
6. Luz Stella Ossa
7. Armando Ballestas


1. Herman Arboleda
2. Gustavo Gallego
3. Nelly Gallego
4. Attorney Enrique Mancera
5. Jose Guillermo Gallon
6. Pedro Gallon
7. Nicolas Bergonzoli
8. Orlando Sanchez-Christancho
9. Milton Perlaza aka “Javier Valencia” aka “Pele” — for Jorge Eliecer Asprilla Perea
10. Carlos Ramon-Zapata
11. Oscar Campuzano
12. Gustavo Usuga
13. Juan Gabriel Usuga
14. Bernardo Sanchez-Norena
15. Maria Elena Londono for Hector Mario Londono-Vasquez “Negro Yuca”
16. Jorge Orrego for Yvonne Maria Scaff de Saldarriaga
17. The Tascon sisters for Alfredo Tascon-Aguirre
18. Bernal’s wife for Alejandro Bernal-Madrigal “Juvenal”
19. Attorney Roberto Uribe

Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #17 
Posted on Fri, Sep. 28, 2007

Plane crash in Mexico investigated

Star-Telegram staff writer; McClatchy Newspapers

U.S. authorities are assisting the Mexican government in investigating an American business jet that crashed in Cancun this week with four tons of cocaine on board, officials said Thursday.

One of the registered owners of the plane, Joao Luiz Malago, said in a telephone interview from Brazil that his Florida-based company sold the aircraft for $2 million on Sept. 16 to a Lakeland, Fla., man and his partner, who Malago believed was from Miami.

Malago said he feared that the man was dead because he hasn't answered the phone.

Officials at the U.S. Embassy in Mexico had no information on any U.S. citizens being killed or arrested in connection with the aircraft, a 1975 model Gulfstream II.

Some news reports have linked the plane to the transport of terrorism suspects to the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, but those reports cite logs that indicate only that the plane flew twice between Washington, D.C., and Guantanamo and once between Oxford, Conn., and Guantanamo. No suspects are known to have been transferred to Guantanamo directly from the U.S.

The Mexican attorney general's office said the plane crashed Monday in a remote jungle area on the Yucatan Peninsula. Two men were arrested and jailed on drug trafficking charges, officials said.


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #18 

American Indian Movement leader Vernon Bellecourt dies at 75

by STEVE KARNOWSKI Associated Press Writer
The Associated Press - Sunday, October 14, 2007



Vernon Bellecourt, a longtime leader of the American Indian Movement, died Saturday. He was 75.

Bellecourt died at Abbott Northwestern Hospital of complications of pneumonia, said his brother, Clyde Bellecourt, a founder of the activist group.

Clyde Bellecourt said his brother had been in Venezuela about four weeks ago to meet with President Hugo Chavez to discuss Chavez' program for providing heating assistance to American Indian tribes. He fell ill around the time of his return. His condition continued to deteriorate, and he was put on a respirator a week ago. He died within a minute after being disconnected Saturday, his brother said

Just before he was put on the respirator, he joked that the CIA had finally gotten him, his brother recalled Saturday night.

Vernon Bellecourt - whose Objibwe name WaBun-Inini means Man of Dawn - was a member of Minnesota's White Earth band and was an international spokesman for the AIM Grand Governing Council based in Minneapolis. Clyde Bellecourt helped found AIM as a militant group in 1968, and Vernon Bellecourt soon became involved as well, including in its 1973 occupation of the town of Wounded Knee on the Pine Ridge reservation in South Dakota.

In recent years, Bellecourt was active in the fight against American Indian nicknames for sports teams as president of the National Coalition on Racism in Sports and Media. He was arrested in Cleveland during the 1997 World Series and again in 1998 during protests against the Cleveland Indians' mascot, Chief Wahoo. The first time, the charges were dropped. He was never charged in the second case.

"He was willing to put his butt on the line to draw attention to racism in sports," his brother said.

Bellecourt was involved as a negotiator in AIM's 1972 occupation of the Bureau of Indian Affairs headquarters in Washington as part of the Trail of Broken Treaties caravan.

He was present only briefly during the 71-day Wounded Knee standoff with federal agents, Clyde Bellecourt said. He stayed mostly on the outside to serve as a spokesman and fundraiser.

After Wounded Knee, Vernon Bellecourt became a leader of AIM's work abroad, meeting with presidents such as Daniel Ortega of Nicaragua, as well as Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, his brother said. He added that they plan to list them as honorary pallbearers.

But after Wounded Knee, AIM also became weakened by arrests and internal strife and a backlash against violence blamed on it. One of its founders, Russell Means, became a bitter opponent of the Bellecourts and leader of a rival AIM group.

Vernon Bellecourt was active in the campaign to free AIM activist Leonard Peltier, who was convicted of killing two FBI agents during a shootout in 1975 on the Pine Ridge reservation.

A wake was scheduled for 5 p.m. Monday at All Nations Church in Minneapolis and on Tuesday night at the Circle of Life School in White Earth in northwestern Minnesota, with funeral services planned for Wednesday morning.


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #19 

Biohazard lab worker sues, claiming retaliatory transfer


NEW YORK (AP) _ A former police officer in a municipal lab that tests for AIDS, anthrax and other bio-dangers is suing the city for $2 million, saying his bosses retaliated against him for complaining about the handling of hazardous materials.

Milford Gangadeen, formerly assigned to the Public Health Laboratories in Manhattan, says in court papers his supervisors viewed him "as a nuisance and a potential public relations problem," and had him transferred.

Gangadeen, 28, said the lab, part of the city's Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, violated safety rules while "working with some of the most hazardous and harmful biological materials known to man."

The safety breaches not only put Gangadeen in danger of contracting a fatal disease, but they also put "everyone in the immediate New York City area in grave danger," according to court papers.

Sara Markt, spokeswoman for the Health Department, said in an e-mail that several disciplinary charges are pending against Gangadeen, and none have to do with his complaint of unsafe conditions.

She said Gangadeen was previously suspended from the department because he threatened a supervisor, and he currently faces several charges including violating security rules, unauthorized use of city equipment, and unauthorized absences from work.

He was transferred to another health department facility while department charges were pending

Gangadeen claims his supervisors ignored his warnings about safety, and instead began an effort to fire him from his $40,000-plus job for unfounded reasons.

In May 2006, about three months after the lab received suspected anthrax samples, Gangadeen got a rash on his right leg, court papers say. He believes the rash was caused by anthrax, and he may have been exposed when FBI agents combined 21 samples into four _ without decontaminating the samples _ in an attempt to reduce paperwork, according to court papers.

A doctor gave him the maximum prescription of CIPRO (ciprofloxacin), a powerful antibiotic used to treat people exposed to anthrax.

Gangadeen's lawyer, Walker G. Harman, said Monday two other lab workers support his client's claims and might join the lawsuit against the city. Harman said his client is accused of improperly taking interior photos of the lab to support his complaints. The trial on those charges is scheduled for Nov. 18.

Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #20 




Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #21 

Posted October 18, 2007 | 10:18 AM (EST)
Read More: fisa, FISA Legislation, idaho, Idaho Senator, larry craig, Senator Larry Craig, Breaking Politics News

The United States needs a Senator like Frank Church once again to restore the original purpose of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

My former boss and mentor, Senator Frank Church, led the Senate investigation of Executive branch abuses of civil liberties back in 1975 - 1976 as Chairman of the Senate Committee on Intelligence.

His oversight was badly needed.

Among the findings of the Church Committee:

    * The FBI had created files on over 1 million Americans and carried out over 500,000 investigations of "subversives" from 1960-74 without a single conviction.
    * The CIA had opened the mail to and from selected American citizens which generated 1.5 million names in the Agency's computer bank known as "Operation Chaos"
    * The National Security Agency (NSA) computers had monitored every cable sent or received overseas by Americans from 1947-75.
    * Army intelligence units had conducted investigations against 100,000 U.S. citizens during the Vietnam War era.
    * The Internal Revenue Service had allowed tax information to be misused by intelligence agencies for political purposes.
    * The FBI's counterintelligence program (Cointelpro) had harassed civil rights activities, including Dr. Martin Luther King and Vietnam War dissidents.

The Church Committee's investigations resulted in the creation of a permanent Senate Committee on Intelligence, and the passage of substantial legislation, including the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) in 1978.

Church's work is now being shredded by the Bush Administration.

FISA established a legal framework for electronic eavesdropping at home, including a special FISA court. It was originally passed to allow the government to collect intelligence involving communications with "agents of foreign powers."

The Bush Administration exploited this narrow exception in the passage of the Patriot Act that allows use of FISA to obtain personal records from many sources including libraries and internet service providers, even when they have no connection to terrorism.

Even worse, the Bush Administration now uses FISA to get around the constitutional requirement of seeking a warrant before it eavesdrops on communications by the NSA.

Congress even condoned this abuse of power in passing the "Protect America Act" (also known as "Police America Act") that expires in February 2008.

Legislation currently under consideration - The Restore Act - is a further erosion of individual liberties because it goes beyond individual warrants allowing "basket warrants." A true restoration of our individual liberties will not permit "basket warrants." This provision needs to be fixed and fixed correctly. While there is a split in the civil liberties community about the basket provisions, I don't believe we should settle for just an improvement in existing law. We need real protection.

When I am elected to the Senate, I will demand an end to the abuse of FISA and a return to the checks and balances espoused by Frank Church and the Church Committee.

As a former Congressman, Frank Church staff member, and U.S. Army intelligence office, I will help lead the way back from the civil liberty abuses of this administration.

The New York Times editorial on 11/14/07 pointed out the loopholes in the "Police America Act" and encouraged members of Congress to close those loopholes when the legislation is up for renewal. Yes, indeed.

As Senator, I will return Idaho's representation to the Frank Church values in keeping big government and secret government out of American's personal lives. As another mentor, former Interior Secretary and Governor Cecil Andrus, stated it many times: Idahoans want the Federal government off their back, but by their sides."

Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #22 

Posted October 18, 2007 | 10:18 AM (EST)
Read More: fisa, FISA Legislation, idaho, Idaho Senator, larry craig, Senator Larry Craig, Breaking Politics News

The United States needs a Senator like Frank Church once again to restore the original purpose of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

My former boss and mentor, Senator Frank Church, led the Senate investigation of Executive branch abuses of civil liberties back in 1975 - 1976 as Chairman of the Senate Committee on Intelligence.

His oversight was badly needed.

Among the findings of the Church Committee:

* The FBI had created files on over 1 million Americans and carried out over 500,000 investigations of "subversives" from 1960-74 without a single conviction.
* The CIA had opened the mail to and from selected American citizens which generated 1.5 million names in the Agency's computer bank known as "Operation Chaos"
* The National Security Agency (NSA) computers had monitored every cable sent or received overseas by Americans from 1947-75.
* Army intelligence units had conducted investigations against 100,000 U.S. citizens during the Vietnam War era.
* The Internal Revenue Service had allowed tax information to be misused by intelligence agencies for political purposes.
* The FBI's counterintelligence program (Cointelpro) had harassed civil rights activities, including Dr. Martin Luther King and Vietnam War dissidents.

The Church Committee's investigations resulted in the creation of a permanent Senate Committee on Intelligence, and the passage of substantial legislation, including the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) in 1978.

Church's work is now being shredded by the Bush Administration.

FISA established a legal framework for electronic eavesdropping at home, including a special FISA court. It was originally passed to allow the government to collect intelligence involving communications with "agents of foreign powers."

The Bush Administration exploited this narrow exception in the passage of the Patriot Act that allows use of FISA to obtain personal records from many sources including libraries and internet service providers, even when they have no connection to terrorism.

Even worse, the Bush Administration now uses FISA to get around the constitutional requirement of seeking a warrant before it eavesdrops on communications by the NSA.

Congress even condoned this abuse of power in passing the "Protect America Act" (also known as "Police America Act") that expires in February 2008.

Legislation currently under consideration - The Restore Act - is a further erosion of individual liberties because it goes beyond individual warrants allowing "basket warrants." A true restoration of our individual liberties will not permit "basket warrants." This provision needs to be fixed and fixed correctly. While there is a split in the civil liberties community about the basket provisions, I don't believe we should settle for just an improvement in existing law. We need real protection.

When I am elected to the Senate, I will demand an end to the abuse of FISA and a return to the checks and balances espoused by Frank Church and the Church Committee.

As a former Congressman, Frank Church staff member, and U.S. Army intelligence office, I will help lead the way back from the civil liberty abuses of this administration.

The New York Times editorial on 11/14/07 pointed out the loopholes in the "Police America Act" and encouraged members of Congress to close those loopholes when the legislation is up for renewal. Yes, indeed.

As Senator, I will return Idaho's representation to the Frank Church values in keeping big government and secret government out of American's personal lives. As another mentor, former Interior Secretary and Governor Cecil Andrus, stated it many times: Idahoans want the Federal government off their back, but by their sides."

Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #23 

Bush's America: The Higazy Case

24 Oct 2007 11:04 am

You think coerced confessions are only part of Third World justice systems? Not under this US president. Check out the full and bizarre account of an arrest and conviction of a man subsequently proven innocent of alleged ties to 9/11 terrorists. The case was written up by the US Court of Appeals in New York. The case hinged on the FBI's threat of torturing a man's family in Egypt:

Higazy alleges that during the polygraph, Templeton told him that he should cooperate, and explained that if Higazy did not cooperate, the FBI would make his brother “live in scrutiny” and would “make sure that Egyptian security gives [his] family hell.” Templeton later admitted that he knew how the Egyptian security forces operated: “that they had a security service, that their laws are different than ours, that they are probably allowed to do things in that country where they don’t advise people of their rights, they don’t – yeah, probably about torture, sure.”

Higazy later said, "I knew that I couldn't prove my innocence, and I knew that my family was in danger." He explained that "[t]he only thing that went through my head was oh, my God, I am screwed and my family's in danger. If I say this device is mine, I'm screwed and my family is going to be safe. If I say this device is not mine, I’m screwed and my family’s in danger. And Agent Templeton made it quite clear that cooperate had to mean saying something else other than this device is not mine.”

The Court tried to keep this part of the judgment classified, yanking it from the official site after mistakenly posting it - but not till the interrogation details were exposed. Higazy's false confession - that he was using a radio transmitter in his hotel room to converse with terrorists in airplanes - was rendered moot by the owner of the transmitter, an airline pilot who had also stayed in the room, subsequently claiming it from the hotel as his own. But that didn't stop the threat of torture. And that didn't stop the conviction. This is how we get intelligence in the Bush-Cheney era. Here's Higazy's explanation for cracking under pressure:

The Egyptian government has very little tolerance for anybody who is —they’re suspicious of being a terrorist. To give you an idea, Saddam’s security force—as they later on were called his henchmen—a lot of them learned their methods and techniques in Egypt; torture, rape, some stuff would be even too sick to . . . . My father is 67. My mother is 61. I have a brother who developed arthritis at 19. He still has it today. When the word ‘torture’ comes at least for my brother, I mean, all they have to do is really just press on one of these knuckles. I couldn’t imagine them doing anything to my sister.

Higazy added:

[L]et’s just say a lot of people in Egypt would stay away from a family that they know or they believe or even rumored to have anything to do with terrorists and by the same token, some people who actually could be —might try to get to them and somebody might actually make a connection. I wasn’t going to risk that. I wasn’t going to risk that, so I thought to myself what could I say that he would believe. What could I say that’s convincing? And I said okay.

Yes: this is America. And what Higazy claims was done to him is a war crime.


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #24 

Activist Lawyer Speaks Out Against Green Scare

Police StateNew Orleans, October 29 - Activist lawyer Brenna Bell spoke out against the Green Scare today at Loyola Law School, and informed people about how they can resist it. The Green Scare is a term used to describe a repressive campaign currently being carried out by the federal government against environmental activists.

Activist Lawyer Speaks Out Against Green Scare

by Michael Steinberg

Activist Brenna Bell spoke out against the Green Scare at Loyola Law School on October 29.

New Orleans, October 29 - Activist lawyer Brenna Bell spoke out against the Green Scare today at Loyola Law School, and informed people about how they can resist it.

The Green Scare is a term used to describe a repressive campaign currently being carried out by the federal government against environmental activists.

Bell said the Green Scare is also called that because "of its resonance with the Red Scare" of the McCarthyite 1950s. Then the Communists were the bogeymen, today it's the Terrorists.
Or, more specifically, Eco-Terrorists. Brenna Bell said that term originated with the Wise Use movement, a right wing attempt to criminalize environmental successes.

Former US Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez gave the green light to the Green Scare by devoting an entire press conference to "Eco-terrorism" several years ago, Bell reported.
Around that same time the FBI announced that the ELF (Earth Liberation Front) was the #1 domestic terrorism threat. In late 2005 the G-men (FBI) began "Operation Backfire." It's purpose: to seek out and destroy environmental direct action groups, especially the ELF and ALF (Animal Liberation Front).

Bell reported that these groups had previously carried out a number of successful actions involving saboutage, arson and property damage. These included the burning of an under-construction ski resort in an old growth forest in Colorado; the destruction of SUVs in Oregon; the release of 2000 minks from a 'mink farm' in that state; and the freeing of wild horses slated to be ground up into horse meat.

None of these actions were intended to cause, or resulted in, any harm to people, according to Bell.

"Green Scare is a smokescreen to divert people's attention from real terrorist actions," Bell said. "Our planet is in serious trouble. The real Eco-Terroists are those people who pollute our air and water for short term profits. The environmental activists were motivated by a desire to stop environmental degradation."

Bell also pointed out that sabotage and property damage are American traditions in resisting oppression. Audience members gave examples of this such as the Boston Tea Party, the freeing of slaves from prisons, and the disabling of nuclear weapons.

Thus far "Operation Backfire" has resulted in 16 indictments. Bell said the charges initially were "arson, attempted arson, conspiracy, and carrying a destructive device. The minimum maximum for that last charge is 20 years."

The threatened sentences for each person charged were life + 115 years.

The government was able to get these indictments because one ELF member, Jacob "Jake the Snake" Ferguson, "known to be unstable and a heroin addict," Bell said, responded to an FBI offer of $150,000 for incriminating info leading to the ELF.

"The feds then used the life + 115 threat to get corroborating witnesses," Bell said. "About half of those indicted turned states' witnesses."

In addition one of those indicted, Bob Rodgers, killed himself in his jail cell shortly after his arrest.
The indictments and turning of activists into snitches created "a chilling effect" in environmental communities in the Pacific Northwest, according to Bell.

As have the sentences since handed down. Bell reported these as "37 to 156 months--3 to 13 years. The people who refused to 'cooperate' got vastly greater sentences. Now the government is seeking 'terrorism enhancement', which could add half as many years to the sentences."

Meanwhile, Jake the Snake, although also indicted, is walking. He received no prison time.
One more person indicted has refused to cooperate with authorities, and is awaiting trial.
And all this without any terrorist charges being brought against anyone.

Lessons learned? Among them, Brenna Bell said, are that "causing internal division causes more damage than anything else the government could do.

"Green Scare isn't about justice, it's about coercion and punishment of people because of their politics. We're living in a police state. The government is using the 'War On Terror' to totally abrogate the Bill of Rights.

"Know your rights and use them. Educate others. Hold protective rights trainings. Know the law and know how it might fail you.

"Don't gossip. Don't talk about stuff you don't want the government to know. Don' be a snitch.
"Know our history. This isn't the first time this has happened. This is what the US does every time a war starts, to take rights away. Know how other people lived through it.

"Reject the chill. The government can't round us all up, so it uses the chill to scare people. Keep acting for justice. Otherwise the government will keep bowling over our rights until it's total fascism."

Bell's appearance was sponsored by the National Lawyer's Guild of Loyola.


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #25 

The Secrecy File
Daily developments about the growing level of secrecy in the federal government and how it impacts the public's right to know.

The entry titled "Reporters Committee: first amendment at stake," and any of the comments about it.

Reporters Committee: first amendment at stake

By Rebecca Carr | Tuesday, November 6, 2007, 04:56 PM

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press urged a federal court of appeals in Boston to rule that FBI agents violated the media’s rights by “intimidating and harassing them” last year as they covered a law enforcement raid on a political activist.

Lawyers for the Virginia-based non-profit organization assert in a legal brief filed today that reporters were assaulted when an FBI agent pointed a rifle at them as they reported on the February 2006 raid in Puerto Rico.

The U.S. District Court in Puerto Rico held such acts were protected state action and did not violate the journalists’ First Amendment Rights.

But Lucy Dalglish, the executive director of the Reporters Committee believes otherwise.

“The video of the attacks by law enforcement officials on the Puerto Rican journalists is shocking,” Dalglish said. It was clear the FBI’s search of the premises was over when the media came onto the property at the invitation of one of the residents, she said.

“There was no justification whatsoever for the attack on the reporters and photographers.” Dalglish said.

In a friend-of-the-court brief supporting the journalists’ appeal to the First Circuit, the committee’s legal team argued that such disregard for the long-recognized right to report news under the First Amendment should not stand.

“When journalists pose no threat to the investigation of a state actor and are merely present to observe and report on public events, such aggressive conduct by a state actor is surely unwarranted and cannot be tolerated,” the lawyers for the committee wrote.

Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #26 
two easy reads all about how your tax dollars are spent.
I guess that makes you a co-enabler....time to go into your protective stupidity mode.

Caught on Tape: Police Taser Suspect, FBI Opens Inquiry                        
                                                                                                        KENT, Ohio -- The FBI has opened a "preliminary inquiry" into the Kent police department after a suspect was tasered while being booked.  The incident was recorded by a surveillance camera inside a booking room.

Sly Parham, 24, was arrested May 17, and charged with menacing by stalking.  While being booked, a detention officer asks him to remove everything from his pockets.

"So I did all that, so they kept asking me the same question over and over again, then I tell them search me yourself, I did all that," Parham said.

On the video, released by the Kent Police Department, Parham can be heard yelling "There's nothing in my pockets, I just emptied my pockets." 

When he reaches toward a property bin, the officers push him against a wall, yelling, "Just put your hands on the wall and don't turn around."

While against the wall, an officer tasers Parham, who falls to the ground. 

"Stop fighting, stop fighting, stop fighting," an officer yells.

Parham says he was not resisting the officers. "You gotta put your stuff in a property box, so that's what I did, I was showing them, trying to show them that I had already put all my stuff in the property box," he says.

While on the ground, one officer has a heated exchange with Parham.

OFFICER: "You understand who runs this place?"
PARHAM: "Yes."
OFFICER: "It's not you is it?
PARHAM: "Why wouldn't I?"
OFFICER: "Who runs this place?"
PARHAM  "The police."
OFFICER: "Who runs it?"
PARHAM: "You."
OFFICER: "You sir!"

Kent police would not discuss the incident, but said one of the officers, Lt. John Altomare, was disciplined, although they would not reveal what the discipline was.

An FBI spokesman says the agency is reviewing the circumstances of the incident and will gather facts to determine whether Parham's civil rights were violated.

Published on Thursday, March 9, 2000 in In These Times
Chemical Cops:
Tear Gas And Pepper Spray Can Be Deadly
by Terry Allen

The tons of tear gas and pepper spray munitions Seattle police used on demonstrators and bystanders alike at the anti-WTO demonstrations last December contained chemicals implicated in lung problems, eye damage and even death. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the effects of these chemical weapons are not always confined to 15 or so minutes of intense pain and incapacitation. According to manufacturers' documents, military research and medical literature, each of these agents carries short- and long-term health risks; various formulations contain potential carcinogens.

Tear gas and pepper spray cause health problems even when used within guidelines on healthy people. But in Seattle, as elsewhere, law enforcement violated manufacturers' warnings and inevitably sprayed vulnerable populations such as people with diabetes, asthma, allergies or heart problems, as well as pregnant women, children and the elderly. "It was like a war zone," says Russell Sparks, a student from Bellingham, Washington, who helped block a Seattle intersection on December 1. "The police rolled up in humvees, and I heard the clink, clink of cops jogging toward us. Within seconds the area was filled with gas and the air was pure white all around. I coughed and coughed. I felt like I was on fire, my friend and I both became hysterical. He fell down. A middle-aged man near me passed out, eyes open, shaking, dry heaving, twitching in the shoulders. A woman passed out face down. I tried to help but my eyes were burning and I was screaming for medical help."

Three days later, Sparks still felt "serious flu symptoms, phlegmy, tired, fatigued, problems with eyes focusing, burning, slightly nauseous. I felt like it went into every pore." He wasn't alone. The persistence and severity of symptoms widely reported by demonstrators and hapless bystanders gave rise to speculation that some "mystery gas" had been used. Rumors of nerve gas spread like a toxic cloud across the Internet.

The truth is that tear gas and pepper spray alone can cause temporary blindness, respiratory problems, vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue and disorientation. Symptoms may linger for days in otherwise healthy individuals. Out of 187 North Carolina corrections officers exposed to pepper spray under controlled conditions for training purposes, according to Duke University Medical Center study, eight had symptoms persisting for more than a week, including eye problems, chest problems, headaches and disorientation.

More seriously, reports by the Army and in prestigious medical journals have warned of respiratory arrest, pulmonary edema, and acute elevations in blood pressure associated with risk of stroke and heart attack. Military and industrial sources also point to the possibility of cancer, birth defects and DNA damage from these chemical weapons.

While tear gas and pepper spray are banned from use in war by an international treaty, domestic use is legal and nearly ubiquitous in the United States. The advantages of these "non-lethal" technologies, police say, include fewer deaths and serious injuries to officers and suspects, a more benign image for departments and less litigation. Currently, more than 90 percent of the country's police departments issue pepper spray to their officers, according to the Justice Department, and many departments store tear gas for use in crowd control or riot situations.

Despite widespread use, none of the agents sold for police purposes is monitored, tested or regulated by any government agency for consistency, purity, toxicity or even efficacy. Dr. Howard Hu, a Harvard University epidemiologist, says that the extent of ill effects from these chemicals is unknowable since there have been no rigorous, independent follow-up studies on exposed populations. Little has changed since 1989, when Hu wrote in the Journal of the American Medical Association, "There is an ongoing need for investigation into the full toxicological potential of tear gas chemicals and renewed debate on whether their use can be condoned under any circumstances."

Because they are treated as weapons, police-grade products "fall between regulatory cracks," says Raymond Downs, program manager in science and technology at the National Institute for Justice. "Police are at the mercy of manufacturers," Downs adds, in that they have to rely solely on makers' claims for the safety of the chemical weapons themselves and for the wide variety of solvents and propellants routinely added to turn the active ingredients into aerosols.

Those claims may not be all that reliable. In a 1995 report, the Army warned that "manufacturer literature ... is often misleading, incomplete or inaccurate," and in some cases "manufacturers refuse to disclose the components of [their] products." Indeed, Def-Tec, one of the country's largest suppliers, declines to release information on concentration of pepper and tearing chemicals in its dozen products deployed in Seattle. It also won't disclose which solvents or propellants were incorporated, except to refer to three generic product-safety data sheets that the Seattle police are required by law to release.

When it comes to health aspects of any of the chemical weapons, used either singly or in combination, Downs notes, "there is almost no independent research going on." "They all spin the data," adds one federal official. "One manufacturer will say the other's is toxic, but mine is just fine."

Zarc International, which makes only pepper spray products, charges in its literature that the tear gases its competitors make promote cancer and cause allergic reaction and eye injuries. Def-Tec, a division of Armor Holdings, which manufactures both pepper spray and tear gas, denies any safety problems. "We know of tens of thousands of times that these have been deployed without any incident," says Dave Dubay, director of research for the Casper, Wyoming-based company.

It is not just manufacturers' data that have been called into question, but also the federal government's. After the FBI endorsed pepper spray in 1987 as an "official chemical agent," it was added to the arsenals of most police agencies and largely replaced tear gas. At the FBI, the Johnny Appleseed of pepper spray was special agent Thomas Ward, director of the Quantico Firearms Training Unit and the bureau's chief expert on pepper spray. Ward, who supervised, approved and guaranteed the chemical weapon's quality and safety for the FBI, also wrote the main bureau study cited by law enforcement agencies to defend its use. He promoted pepper spray in a widely disseminated official FBI training infomercial. Then, in February 1996, Ward pled guilty to a felony for accepting a $57,500 kickback from Luckey Police Products, the country's second largest manufacturer of pepper spray, whose weapons Ward had touted as an FBI trainer as far back as the mid-'80s.

While police rely on manufacturers for safety assurances, the public relies on police to define when use of chemicals weapons is a safe, appropriate response. The International Association of Chiefs of Police issues "use of force" recommendations for various weapons, but individual departments around the country set their own guidelines and enforce them with varying degrees of rigor.

Seattle police, for example, are authorized to use chemical weapons against people engaged in peaceful civil disobedience. Boston police can only use pepper spray in self-defense against a violent physical assault or when an officer trying to make an arrest is in danger of being injured or losing custody of the suspect. In the case of passive resistance, says Gary Eblan, defensive tactics instructor at the Boston Police Academy, "We would have four officers lift and take the subject to a holding area or wagon." Washington, D.C. may face crowd control situations similar to those in Seattle when demonstrators descend on the nation's capital in April for meetings of the IMF and World Bank. The Metropolitan Police Department is training 1,400 officers for crowd control and stocking up on chemical weapons and rubber bullets. Planning is underway to coordinate response with several federal agencies, including the FBI, U.S. Park Police, U.S. Capitol Police, Secret Service, U.S. Marshals and Federal Emergency Management Agency. The Metro Police Department refused to release its written guidelines for "use of force."

Police guidelines and manufacturers' standards inevitably vanish in thick air under real life conditions. When deploying chemical weapons on crowds, police have no practical way to monitor those sprayed, to screen out people with risk factors, or to avoid bystanders. Nor can they quickly decontaminate those affected. "Responsible police have a saying: 'When you spray them, you own them,' " Downs says. "There is a requirement for aftercare. You need to make sure if they need medical attention, they get it. In the military, if a few limp away, we may not care. In the civilian world, aftercare is essential."

Manufacturers also warn against deploying chemical weapons in closed spaces--a warning notoriously violated, with fatal consequences, by U.S. law enforcement in the Waco, Texas siege of the Branch Davidians. The American Civil Liberties Union and other groups have documented numerous instances in which pepper spray was used by police as a form of "street justice" to mete out pain and punish unruly or uppity suspects after they already had been subdued. U.S. prison guards routinely use chemical weapons to perform "cell extractions."

Excessive exposure--both accidental and intentional-- is another problem. An internal report by Def-Tec cautions that more than a single, one-second burst of pepper spray "obviously would be an overexposure, which may cause added health risks." And manufacturers recommend that police hold the spray at least several feet from a subject's face to avoid eye damage.

Yet videotape clearly shows instances in Seattle in which police held aerosol cans within inches of the faces of seated protesters and sprayed them repeatedly or in long bursts. "My impression was that most Seattle police officers handled themselves with some restraint, but some didn't," says Larry Gossett, a member of the King County Council. "We got too many reports from people handled in a brutal way for all of them to be false."

An additional risk in situations such as Seattle--where police admitted spraying crowds with multiple chemicals--is that "there has been no research on the synergistic effects," Downs says. Maryland-based Zarc International charges that "mixing [pepper spray] and other chemical agents such as [tear gas] ... can prove to be harmful or even fatal in real-life situations." The probability of adverse side effects is only exacerbated by the addition of solvents and propellants--some of which are themselves toxic or carcinogenic--to the active ingredients to turn them into effective aerosol weapons.

Despite the dangers and drawbacks of tear gas and pepper spray, most critics are careful to differentiate between one-on-one use by a disciplined, trained officer who is physically threatened and wide dispersal on large and varied crowd of generally peaceful protesters. When judiciously used, chemical agents can immediately incapacitate a belligerent suspect with far less risk of permanent or serious damage than a bullet or a baton blow. "If an officer is faced with a situation in which his life is at stake, it makes sense to respond in a way that will leave both people alive," says Lew Pepper, a physician at the Boston University School of Public Health. "But there is no justification for use of toxic and potentially cancer-causing agents for crowd control for civil disobedience. There are better ways to deal with political speech."

There are also better ways to serve and protect the public than to deploy inadequately tested, unregulated chemical weapons. Unless there is independent research establishing that these weapons are reasonably safe, and until there is credible oversight of police practices and manufacturers' claims, the public has no way to assess how much risk it is accepting in the name of law and order. n Terry J. Allen can be reached at tallen@igc.org. Support for this article was provided by the Fund for Constitutional Government.

Terry J. Allen is a contributing editor of In These Times. Support for this article was provided by the Fund for Constitutional Government.


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #27 
Men and women who created 911 work hard to muddy waters about their role in creating 911.
a species that hires bodyguards to protect them looses the ability to protect themselves when their bodyguards turn on them

FBI agent: Saddam lied about WMDs to fake out Iran
posted at 9:00 am on November 12, 2007 by Allahpundit

LESTER HOLT: On this Veterans Day, with American troops still embroiled in Iraq, new details are emerging about some of the issues that led the U.S. into war. The secrets of Saddam Hussein are revealed in a new book that includes details from an FBI agent who spent months with the Iraqi leader after his capture. Here’s NBC justice correspondent Pete Williams.

PETE WILLIAMS: Saddam Hussein told his American captors that he so feared Iran, he wanted Iranian leaders to believe that he had nuclear and biological weapons. So he planned to fool the U.S. by, among other things, stalling U.N. inspectors to make it appear he had something to hide, weapons of mass destruction or WMD. But he hoped the post-Gulf War sanctions on Iraq would dissolve, allowing him to pursue a nuclear capability. That’s what he told the only American to extensively debrief him after he was captured in 2003, according to investigative reporter Ron Kessler.

RON KESSLER: Saddam said that if America thought that he had WMD, then, of course, Iran would, and this would fulfill his goal of making sure that Iran did not want to attack Iraq.

A few hundred thousand American troops were massing across the border in Kuwait to knock him out — and Saddam was worried about Iran? This subject came up a few weeks ago in the context of Rudy’s post hoc justification for invading, namely, that if we hadn’t done so, Saddam would have had no choice but to restart his nuke program to keep pace with Tehran. In that sense, the war was true preemption. But follow out the counterfactual. Let’s say Saddam went to the UN and U.S. in February 2003 and came clean: he had no program, it was all a decoy to keep the Iranians honest, what can we do about this unfortunate misunderstanding? What would have/should have happened? Even in the unlikely event that his revelation derailed the war, it would have left Iraq cheek by jowl with a soon-to-be nuclear-armed Iran that no longer had to worry about any Iraqi deterrent. Presumably they would have used the bomb as leverage to extend their influence in the southern Shiite areas, knowing that Saddam wouldn’t dare act against them. You can take it from there.

Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #28 
couple of easy  pieces....

FBI agent says charity founder lied about Afghan trip

Email|Print| Text size + By Shelley Murphy Globe Staff / November 16, 2007

An FBI agent testified yesterday that the founder of a defunct Boston-based Islamic charity told agents he had "never ever" been to Afghanistan, but they later learned he traveled there in 1994 and personally met with a notorious Afghan mujahideen warlord.

FBI special agent Christopher Peet told jurors that he and another agent showed up unexpectedly at Emededdin Muntasser's office in April 2003 to question him about the charity, Massachusetts Care International Inc., and its ties to a New York organization. He said they would have drastically changed their focus if Muntasser had disclosed his meeting in Afghanistan with warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatayr.

"We would have been very interested in how that meeting took place, where it took place," Peet told jurors.

Hekmatayr, who led a group that helped end Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in 1989, was designated a global terrorist by the US State Department in February 2003. But US District Judge F. Dennis Saylor ruled yesterday that jurors should not be told that Hekmatayr was an alleged terrorist because it could prejudice them against Muntasser and his two codefendants. The judge said that Muntasser's alleged meeting with Hekmatayr was in 1994 and that there was no evidence that he knew the warlord was deemed a terrorist by the US government nearly a decade later.

Muntasser, 42, of Braintree, who owns Logan Furniture Co., is accused of lying to federal agents for failing to disclose his trip to Afghanistan. He is also charged, along with Muhamed Mubayyid, 42, of Shrewsbury and Samir Al-Monla, 50, of Boston of defrauding the government to win tax-exempt status for Care International. Prosecutors allege the men failed to disclose to the Internal Revenue Service that the humanitarian organization also distributed projihad publications and professed support for Muslim militants overseas. Care International raised $1.7 million between 1993 and 2003.

Defense lawyers have argued that the three men are being prosecuted for their political views, and they told jurors during opening statements that all the money raised by Care International went to charitable causes and that no money was ever diverted to support Islamic militants.

In his opening remarks, Norman Zalkind, Muntasser's lawyer, said his client initially didn't disclose his trip to Afghanistan in 2003 because he was fearful that he might be sent to the US detention camp at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. But, later, Zalkind said, Muntasser consulted a lawyer and said that after traveling to Pakistan to verify that Care International's money was being used for charitable causes, he crossed the border into Afghanistan.

Muntasser said he worked as a volunteer for Al-Kifah Refugee Center, which was based in New York and had a branch in Boston, but split from the organization over concerns it wasn't operating as a nonprofit, then formed Care International, Peet said.








Chertoff Created Terror Pretexts for US Police State

Missile Defense, Nuclear Technologies Transferred to Russia, China

Forces at Work to Build a US Police State










Patrick Briley
March 24, 2007

Convicted Oklahoma City (OKC) bombing conspirator Terry Nichols has alleged that former high level FBI official Larry Potts gave instructions to Timothy McVeigh to orchestrate the bombing. Nichols claims McVeigh said this before the bombing in a "slip of the tongue" when McVeigh said he was angry with Potts for "changing the target".

The seriousness of Nichols' allegation against Larry Potts lies partly in the fact that at the time of the OKC bombing Potts was an Assistant Deputy Director of the FBI who was put directly in charge of the OKC bombing investigation on April 19, 1995. In early May 1995 Potts was next promoted to the Deputy Director of the FBI, the "number two man" in the FBI under Director Louis Freeh.

Many are skeptical of Nichols allegations since he is a convicted mass murderer. However, people should also be skeptical of Larry Potts because of Potts' questionable role at the Waco, Texas and Ruby Ridge, Idaho sieges by the FBI. Potts was censored by the FBI and removed from being Deputy Director for changing FBI rules of engagement that led to the shooting of Vickie Weaver by Lon Horiuchi at the Ruby Ridge siege.

Weldon Kennedy replaced Potts to conduct the OKC bombing investigation and then was made Deputy Director of the FBI after Potts was removed as Deputy Director in July 1995. Danny Defenbaugh was next named to head the OKC bombing investigation. Defenbaugh himself left the FBI in 2001 after it was discovered that thousands of FBI documents Defenbaugh was responsible for relating to the OKC bombing had been withheld at the federal trials of McVeigh and Nichols. Weldon Kennedy also later resigned from the FBI after being accused of lying to Congress about corrupt practices at the FBI crime lab. Every one of the senior FBI officials Louis Freeh had named to head the OKC bombing investigation left their high-level positions in disgrace and joined the FBI's hall of shame. None of these high level FBI officials were ever prosecuted.

But even if it should later be shown that McVeigh did not directly take instructions from Larry Potts, it can still be conclusively shown that high-level FBI officials including Potts and Louis Freeh were behind the FBI instructing provocateurs to encourage and help McVeigh do the OKC bombing. FBI teletypes, memos and 302 reports already obtained by Jesse Trentadue clearly reveal high-level FBI officials used and protected provocateurs to encourage and help McVeigh including Shawn Kenny, German national Andreas Strassmeir, Dave Hollaway, and a member of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) who worked in and out of the FBI infiltrated white supremacist compound, Elohim City, in far Eastern Oklahoma. The spiritual leader for Elohim City, Reverand Milar was an FBI informant. An FBI 302 report obtained by Jesse Trentadue shows that McVeigh attended a meeting with FBI informants and provocateurs at Elohim City in 1994.

Shawn Kenny was an Army private that was involved in Midwest bank robberies with McVeigh. Andreas Strassmeir was in the US with an expired visa, knew McVeigh, encouraged him to blow up federal buildings and gave him advice on explosives. Dave Hollaway was a CIA pilot that introduced Strassmeir to Elohim City and then helped Strassmeir escape the INS to Germany via Mexico after the OKC bombing. Hollaway gave McVeigh advice on where to park his truck bomb for optimal damage and how to rent the truck without being easily detected. Public statements by McVeigh defense attorney Stephen Jones and an article by Ron Ostrow of the LA Times indicate that Louis Freeh knew Strassmeir was at Elohim City in 1993. FBI teletypes show that Freeh knowingly allowed Dave Hollaway to help Strassmeir escape. The FBI later used Hollaway as a negotiator in the 1997 Montana Freeman standoff with the FBI.

Larry Potts was a chief investigator for Louis Freeh during the prosecution of a Georgia mail bombing case called VANPAC that involved interaction with informant members of SPLC before the OKC bombing. Interestingly enough, a formal DOJ report later confirmed FBI crime lab chemist Frederick Whitehurst's allegations that FBI crime lab officials gave misleading if not false testimony in the courts not only about the VANPAC case but also about forensic analysis of the truck bomb used in the OKC bombing. Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa publicly accused Kennedy of lying to Congress about the FBI crime lab and Kennedy was forced to resign.

Larry Potts came under DOJ and Congressional investigation in part because of use of the US military in the Waco operation, a violation of the Posse Comitatus statute. The FBI's use of provocateur Shawn Kenny in the OKC bombing plot was also a violation of the Posse Comitatus statue because Kenny was a private in the US Army. The penchant of Larry Potts of illegally using SPLC members in VANPAC and military personnel in WACO was repeated in the OKC bombing. The forensic evidence was "misrepresented" by the FBI under Potts and Freeh in the VANPAC and OKC bombing cases.

Assistant Deputy Director of the FBI, Danny Coulson was also assigned to the OKC bombing investigation. Coulson had worked with Larry Potts at Ruby Ridge and Waco. There have been persistent allegations that Larry Potts and Coulson were in OKC early, very near to the time of the OKC bombing.

WorldNetDaily reported that Danny Coulson checked into an Oklahoma City hotel nearly nine hours before the OKC bombing. Coulson referred in a report he filed with the FBI on May 16, 1995 to a clandestine operation targeting religious extremists (like at Elohim City) as his initial reason for going to OKC. Travel records and vouchers for Coulson and Larry Potts were listed as "missing," according to documents provided to WorldNetDaily.

Coulson traveled to Kingman Arizona to present a proffer, a plea bargain agreement to McVeigh's neighbor, Michael Fortier between April 28 and 29, 1995. The proffer was prepared by Freeh's and Clinton's legal counsel for the FBI and White House, Howard Shapiro. Coulson wrote in his book No Heroes that he encountered James Rosencrans brandishing a rifle at FBI agents when Coulson arrived to present the proffer.

Rosencrans was a drug dealer who testified at the OKC bombing federal grand jury in June and July 1995. Rosencrans claimed he gave McVeigh methamphetamine in exchange for guns stolen from gun dealer Roger Moore. Four employees at the Travelers Aid in OKC down the street from the Murrah Building saw Rosencrans and FBI provocateurs Shawn Kenny and Muslim Mujahid[in] Menepta with McVeigh's car at the Travelers Aid the day before the OKC bombing .

While Potts and later Weldon Kennedy ran the OKC bombing investigation, Coulson told FBI sketch artist Jean Boylan not to make sketches of a John Doe seen with McVeigh in OKC because he "did not want to help the defense." Boylan did not make sketches of numerous John Does seen with McVeigh in OKC by reliable Travelers Aid witnesses and Army recruiters inside the Murrah Building. Coulson likely was concerned Boylan might have sketched some of the FBI provocateurs seen with McVeigh.

Weldon Kennedy also did his part to cover-up his and the FBI's provocateur role in the OKC bombing, not only while he headed the OKC bombing investigation after Potts, but also when he later assumed Potts' position as Freeh's top Deputy Director.

According to Kevin Flynn of the Rocky Mountain News, Kennedy personally shutdown the FBI investigation into Robert Jacques. Jacques was a military man who had been with McVeigh and Nichols at the Cassville, Missouri real estate office of William Maloney and Joe Davidson in November 1994. Kennedy shutdown the investigation when FBI agents learned that Jacques was "one of ours."

While head of the Phoenix, Arizona FBI office, Kennedy had been in a position to monitor the OKC bombing plot activities via Rosencrans and informants in the Arizona militia that knew McVeigh including the head of the militia, Jack Oliphant and members Robert Jacks and Gary Alan Land. FBI documents obtained by Jesse Trentadue show the FBI had informants in the Arizona militia. Jacks and Land were neighbors of McVeigh in Arizona and followed McVeigh to OKC the day of the OKC bombing and afterwards to Perry, OK where McVeigh had been taken when arrested by the OK Highway Patrol.

While in Arizona, Kennedy specialized in using armored cars in FBI sting operations. In the OKC bombing a man named Robert Jacks was in an armored car observing the OKC bombing according to AP reports. There are persistent allegations that Weldon Kennedy, like Potts and Coulson were in OKC early, very near to the time of the OKC bombing.

An informant at Elohim City named Carol Howe identified men plotting to blow up federal buildings to her BATF agent handler Angela Findley Graham. Graham and Howe did not know the men were FBI provocateurs. As a result of Howe's and Graham's undercover work, the BATF planned a raid on Elohim City for March 1995 that, if successful, would have likely averted the OKC bombing in April 1995. However, the head of the OKC FBI office, Bob Ricks met with the head of the BATF in OK and persuaded the BATF to call off the raid on Elohim City. Ricks no doubt knew of the FBI provocateurs at Elohim City from high-level FBI officials like Potts and Freeh.

Bob Ricks knew Larry Potts and Danny Coulson because all three men were deeply involved in the WACO siege in 1993. Ricks worked with Potts, Coulson, and Kennedy on the OKC bombing investigation until October 1995 when Ricks resigned and was made head of the OKC Department of Safety under OK governor Frank Keating.

But Bob Ricks had more forewarning of the OKC bombing than just Elohim City.

The entire federal family of Ricks' FBI agents, US Marshals and federal judges in OKC was given a serious and official warning of an Islamic terrorist assisted attack on the OKC federal building complex in late March 1995 according to testimony by US prosecutor Beth Wilkinson in a November 1996 federal hearing for the OKC bombing.

Three days before the OKC bombing, the OKC FBI office was warned by William Northrup of an attack on the OKC federal building complex that included the Murrah Building. Northrup was a dual U.S. and Israeli intelligence asset who traveled from Florida to OKC to deliver the warning.

Reliable witnesses place Bob Ricks in front of the Murrah Building no more than 20 minutes after the bombing. If these witnesses' stories are true, then Rick's alibi for the time of the bombing is false and there would be further indication of Rick's prior warning. Ricks said his pager alerted him, as he was getting ready to tee off at the Fire Lake Country Club golf course in Shawnee, OK, 40 minutes away from downtown OKC.

There is a possibility that Robert Hanssen, a senior FBI counter terrorism official close to Louis Freeh, compromised the FBI's Elohim City operation to the KGB. Hanssen was later sentenced to life in prison for spying for the KGB. One of the men at Elohim City known to the BATF and FBI was Dennis Mahon, a member of the Klu Klux Klan who gave speeches in Tulsa, OK on behalf of Saddam Hussein and received a monthly stipend from Iraq of $200 per month. Mahon visited Russia and had ties to the KGB. Was Robert Hanssen aware of Mahon's activities at Elohim City for the KGB and Iraqis? When arrested, McVeigh had phone numbers of Iraqi intelligence agents.

The "old boy" FBI high-level leadership crony network involved in the OKC bombing provocations showed only contempt when they scammed the public with Larry Potts even at his retirement. The August 2001 Congressional Record has this entry:

"The Washington Times reported that a group of FBI managers staged a conference entitled 'Integrity in Law Enforcement'' that was merely a sham and a cover, so that senior FBI managers could obtain improper reimbursements for traveling to a retirement party for veteran agent Larry Potts [in 1997]… No one was disciplined other than to receive letters of censure."

For more details please see my new book The Oklahoma City Bombing Case Revelations

© 2007 Patrick Briley - All Rights Reserved

E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale

Patrick Briley is a Navy Viet Nam era veteran who served on a Polaris ballistic missile nuclear submarine patrol in the Pacific. His Polaris submarine patrol in far East Asia near China was historically significant and exceptionally dangerous.

His Naval service was from 1968 to 1976 during the Viet Nam era. He was a battalion commander of his Naval ROTC unit and a Midshipman on board the ballistic missile submarine, SSBN 624, the Woodrow Wilson. He was chosen to serve under Admiral Rickover as a project engineer at Naval Reactors near Washington DC. Patrick Briley started research and investigation into terrorist attacks after the Oklahoma City bombing.

Patrick submitted his findings concerning the OKC bombing and the 9-11 attacks in briefings to high-level staff for the Senate Judiciary and Senate and House Intelligence committees, House Speaker Dennis Hastert, and the 9-11 Commission.

E-Mail: pbriley@yahoo.com


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #29 
1984 author George Orwell has the honor of his name being used to re-name the
FBI ACADEMY in Quantico.
Ever add up the number of shows and movies the FOX cartel has created about
Death Squad called the FBI?

Mandy Murphey At The FBI Citizens Academy                        
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        By Mandy Murphey
                                KTVI-myFOXstl.com                                                                                                                          --                                                                                                                 

You won't see them handing out any tickets, but a couple of reporters from FOX 2 now have a different perspective on law enforcement.

Wednesday, 20 people graduated from the FBI Citizens Academy. FOX 2’s Summer Knowles and Mandy Murphey received certificates after attending an 8-week class every Tuesday night at FBI headquarters.

They learned about the inner workings of how the FBI conducts it's investigations and got a chance to go to the shooting range and learn how to fire various weapons.

The Bureau selects people from the community each year to participate in the Academy.                                


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #30 

Jakes to rip Rudy over 9/11 legacy

Converge on Granite State

By Dave Wedge
Saturday, November 17, 2007 -
+ Recent Articles + Email + Bio

A group of New York City firefighters who lost brother jakes in the 9/11 attacks is taking its anti-Rudy Giuliani message to New Hampshire this weekend, blasting the Big Apple’s ex-mayor for “exploiting” the catastrophe for political gain.

The New York City Firefighters & Families will be spreading its “Rudy’s No Hero” campaign at firehouses and diners in the Granite State tomorrow and will host a town hall forum at Dartmouth College on Monday.

“We want them to know about him. He’s saying he’s the big 9/11 hero. It’s a big fabrication,” said New York Fire Deputy Lt. Jim Riches, whose firefighter son Jimmy died at Ground Zero. “He failed to prepare us for 9/11.”

The Giuliani campaign declined comment but released a statement from FDNY firefighter Lee Ielpi, who said: “On that day and the days following, New Yorkers and the rest of the country were fortunate to have the steady and strong leadership of Mayor Rudy Giuliani.”

“America’s mayor” has been dogged by New York firefighters who claim he misrepresented his leadership before and after the attacks. Chief among the group’s complaints are that the New York Fire Department had the same malfunctioning radios on Sept. 11, 2001, that failed during the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

“Why did they give radios to my son that didn’t work?” Riches asked. “I want him to answer all the questions and admit the mistakes that were made.”

The group also says Giuliani cut the recovery effort short, allowed human remains to be shipped to a Staten Island dump, falsely declared the Ground Zero air safe and didn’t provide rescue workers adequate respirators.

The firefighter backlash hit an apex this summer when the International Association of Firefighters released a scathing video raising many of the same complaints being voiced by Riches’ group. In the wake of the ad, Giuliani defended his record, saying that firefighter funding was strong during his administration and that the recovery effort was always a top priority.

Asked why the group was heading to New Hampshire, Riches said: “I am just strictly against him running. I think he’s totally unqualified. We want to tell everyone in New Hampshire and everywhere else who this man really is.”


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #31 
Why American students are hunger striking

Claire Provost

Published 19 November 2007


How a growing student movement in the US is resorting to radical tactics to make their voices heard including hunger strikes

Students at New York's Columbia University stopped eating on Thursday 8 November 2007, and within 24 hours the news had reached my warehouse flat in North London.

I called Columbia University President Lee Bollinger, wrote statements of support and solidarity, and signed online petitions.

Everyday during their 10-day hunger strike (which ended at 9pm on 16 November) I logged onto the internet to check the status of the hunger strike and the hunger strikers and to put my fingers on the pulse of the growing student movement in the United States.

Responding to the recent repeat-occurance of swastikas and nooses on campus walls and on the doors of black professors, and protesting the lack of university response, the Columbia hunger strikers are demanded their administration take moral positions and actions against the forces that propagate discrimination and injustice.

They demanded a Core Curriculum reflective of "the multicultural society that we live in and the power relations that constitute it," plans for sustainable expansion that does not displace thousands of Harlem residents, the establishment of an Ethnic Studies program, and proactive efforts to target institutional racism and discrimination.

Their strike ended on Friday after the administration offered to fundraise $50m to expand ethnic and multicultural studies programs and Harlem residents asked the strikers to take this as a "win" and end the fast.

Though it was likely the most radical in its demands, the Columbia hunger strike followed a series of copy-cat actions across the United States in the last two years.

With peaceful demonstrations either used by administrations to justify their legitimacy - "isn't it wonderful that students are free to express their views?" - or as excuses to threaten student radicals and their supporters with arrest or expulsion, many campus activists have come to hunger strikes as a last resort tactic.

Last year, more than five campuses in the U.S. saw hunger strikes among their students, from the University of Vermont (5 days) to Purdue University (26 days), usually tied to campus labour activism.

In April I was arrested along with three other Harvard students by campus police for staging a peaceful political protest at a speech delivered by Robert Mueller, director of the FBI. While detained, campus police told us that though protesters had not been arrested at Harvard for decades, the university was intent on taking a harder line against demonstrators to discourage the growth of "disruptive protests."

In this climate, when Harvard student labour activists were looking for escalation tactics in May, the radical community was either unwilling to risk arrest or expulsion, or - like me - already had out-standing court cases.

With no other option, we launched a hunger strike on 3 May 2007, supporting the recently-unionized campus security officers who were fighting for higher wages and a fair contract. The strike lasted 9 days and left one student hospitalized.

The hunger strike forced the Harvard administration to listen to the demands of the student and worker protestors by threatening the most valuable commodity of the corporatized elite university - it's reputation.

The students of universities such as mine are imagined to one day become the nation's wealthy and powerful, the men and the women who will donate back to their alma mater and brand their lives and their works with the "Harvard" name.

Alumni are the university's connection to money, power, and prestige. By launching a hunger strike that received wide-spread media coverage, we were threatening Harvard's most valuable assets - ourselves.

In response, the university attempted to portray us as immature and confused. On the seventh day, rumours began circulating that the administration was meeting with its lawyers, looking at the legal implications of threatening us with expulsion on psychiatric grounds, claiming that only the mentally imbalanced would choose to go without food for extended periods of time.

While hunger strikes are emotionally and psychologically-taxing, complicated tactics, they are generally very carefully considered and carefully planned.

Hunger strikes and other forms of direct action have been spreading throughout America's university campuses, partially because of the increasingly polarized environment - where the initial neglect and eventual arrest of student protestors leaves little option - and partially because of the support of expanding national networks, connecting student activists across the country.

One such network is that of SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) the multi-issue radical movement of students in the 1960s that disintegrated in 1969 and was reformed in 2006. It was SDS that, along with the Student Afro Society, engineered the shutdown of Columbia University in 1968 during what was called the "Columbia Student Revolt".

The history and legacy of SDS as a nation-wide mobilization of campus radicals has continued to inspire students who admire its commitment to participatory democracy and use of direct action tactics. A call to relaunch the organization went out in January 2006, organized by high school students Jessica Rapchick and Pat Korte.

The new SDS has chapters at 148 colleges and 50 high schools across the United States. Each chapter functions with autonomy, with an anti-bureaucratic anti-hierarchical decentralized national organization. Fighting the corporatization of university campuses, engaged in anti-war organizing, and employing a diversity of direct action tactics, SDS is invigorating students on individual campuses and strengthening connections between them.

Though it was not an SDS action, news of the Columbia hunger strike spread like wildfire across the country. I was notified of the strike via the North East Regional list within hours of its commencement.

Similarly, in March 2006 when two students at New York's Pace University were arrested following SDS protests of a speech by Bill Clinton, the national and regional SDS networks mobilized immediately, circulating petitions, letters, and co-ordinating phone calls in protest of the arrests and in solidarity with the demonstrators.

In this context, the Columbia hunger strike - and its resounding success - represents a new page in student radicalism in the United States.

Far from the campaigns that target single issues, the strike dares to reach further, demanding not "accountability" or "transparency" on behalf of the administrators, but questioning the role of un-democratic decision-making in a supposed place of learning and drawing attention to the need to examine the forces behind the propagation of racism and discrimination.

Radical in its scope and representative of the new national networks of solidarity and support, the Columbia hunger strike stands as the next timid yet determined step of the re-awakening and re-invigorated American Young Left.

Claire Provost graduated from Harvard in June 2007, where she studied Urban Planning and was a member of the Harvard Student Labour Action Movement and a founding member of Harvard SDS. She participated in the 9-day hunger strike in May 2007 for workers' rights on campus

Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #32 

11/21/2007 Print this article | E-mail this Article to a Friend | New: Discuss this Article |

Informant speaks out on FBI investigation of Atlanta narc officers

'I just wanted to drift off. I wanted to disappear.' 
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
ATLANTA, Ga. — Alex White maintained a year ago he was a "hero" and risked his livelihood and life when he told federal authorities Atlanta cops were trying to cover up the truth about an elderly woman's death in a botched drug raid.

Atlanta Police Det. J. Owens, left, steps over the police tape as Det. C. Faircloth follows at the home of 92-year-old Kathryn Johnston Wednesday, Nov. 22, 2006 in Atlanta.(AP Photo/Ric Feld)
It is still his mantra.

"I am a hero," White said.

Now he feels abandoned by the FBI agents, who for months talked to him almost every day.

White admits he's become paranoid. He said it's been two to three months since he spoke to agents. He says they don't even return his calls.

"Are they mad at me?" said White, whose birth name is Alexis Antonio White.

He sometimes regrets telling federal agents some Atlanta police narcotics officers were trying to get him to lie to help them cover up the circumstances surrounding the killing of a 92-year-old woman who was shot to death by police one year ago this week.

"They've put a strain on my life," White, 25, said in an interview. "Where do I go from here?"

White was a certified confidential informant, having worked with Atlanta's drug officers for four years and considered reliable, when Kathryn Johnston was fatally shot in her living room by police executing a no-knock search warrant on a house where they hoped to find a kilogram of cocaine.

The officers wanted to use White in their operation. He had several drug arrests and spent two years on probation several years ago for a cocaine-related charge. On Nov. 21, 2006, White wasn't available because he had no transportation to the Neal Street neighborhood in northwest Atlanta to make an undercover buy for the officers.

The truth of what happened next gradually emerged in news reports, interviews and law enforcement records and in court testimony when two narcotics officers --- Jason R. Smith and Gregg Junnier --- pleaded guilty last April to state and federal charges: Johnson died in a hail of police gunfire. The next day, the officers involved began working on a cover-up.

They allegedly wanted White to help them.

White's version is that police put him in a car and spent hours pressuring him to cooperate. He says he refused, escaped from the vehicle and called federal authorities, who placed him in protective custody.

For seven months, federal investigators kept him in a hotel and called on him often to tell them what he had done and what he had witnessed police officers doing, White said.

The FBI has repeatedly declined to discuss its investigation.

"Do you know what it's like just sitting around, doing what they wanted me to do?" White said of his work with the FBI as it continued its investigation of Smith, Junnier and a third officer who has pending state charges, Arthur Tesler, as well as APD's narcotics unit and the rest of the police agency.

In April, White married the mother of his 7-year-old daughter. In September, they divorced, and he moved in with a friend who lives more than 20 miles from Neal Street, to a location he wants to keep secret.

White blames the stress of the past 12 months for the end of his marriage.

"It was a lot of things at one time," White said.

He wanted someone with him all the time, but at the same time, he wanted to be alone. "I just wanted to drift off. I wanted to disappear," White said.

White sees his daughter regularly and occasionally visits his mother and his younger sister and brother in East Atlanta, but he otherwise stays in his apartment and away from people and the city.

With each passing month, White said, he becomes more and more afraid and more and more angry. He sees law enforcement taking credit "for something they didn't do" in revealing the cover-up involving Neal Street. "I'm holding a grudge," White said.

At the same time, he insists, "This is a new Alex White," and he refers to the tattoo on his neck, which reads "truly blessed," when he talks of his new attitude and his intent to be a better citizen.

White, who occasionally works laying carpet but otherwise has no other job, has written a letter telling the mayor, the police chief and other officials he plans to sue them over his lost income as an informant, about $20,000 to $30,000 a year.

The letter also says White will ask to be compensated for his daily fear of the police and the drug dealers who now know he may have contributed to their arrests. White says he often sits in his apartment with a screwdriver in hand because he is a felon and cannot have a gun for his protection.

"I've got to worry about the cops. I have to worry about the people on the streets [who sell drugs]," White said.

"It's unreal thinking you're going to die, wondering if you're going to get framed. ... I wonder is my phone tapped? Are they following me? You know how easy it is to be set up when I'm by myself. That's playing with my mind."

White has mixed feelings about his decision to call federal agents instead of covering for the officers. Is he sorry for what he did?

"In a way, I am. In a way, I'm not," White said. "I'm sorry the lady got killed. I'm sorry I said anything [to the FBI]. November 21st changed my life."  


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #33 

The FBI agents don't tell you how they and agents from the CIA turned Bremer into a Manchurian candidate to assassinate Wallace.
some easy reads for those people without Protective Stupidity
1st read

second read
FBI report says Bremer regretted shooting bystanders
Saturday, November 24, 2007
Capital Bureau
MONTGOMERY -- Shortly after his 1972 assassination attempt on Alabama Gov. George Wallace, Arthur Bremer expressed regret for wounding three bystanders, according to an FBI file on the shooting.

The sentiment found its way onto a yellow legal pad, where Bremer apparently attempted to continue a diary he kept in the weeks before the shooting.

"He devotes approximately one paragraph to the idea that his attention was focused absolutely on Governor Wallace and that the only reason other individuals were hurt in the shooting was due to spectators deflecting his arm," according to a report on Bremer's activities in a Maryland jail cell on May 17, 1972, two days after the shooting.

"He expresses regret that other individuals were hurt and reaffirms his determination to shoot Governor Wallace."

Nicholas Zarvos, a Secret Service agent whom Bremer shot in the throat, said Friday that he had not been aware of the material in the FBI report but that an expression of regret made no difference to him.

"From the outset, I didn't have anger or thought of it," Zarvos said by phone from his home in Texas. "You can't do anything about the past."

The attack left Wallace paralyzed for life and permanently damaged Zarvos' voice.

Also wounded in the shooting were Alabama State Trooper E.C. Dothard and campaign worker Dora Thompson.

Dothard died in 1989, and Thompson has disappeared from public view. Wallace died in 1998.

The legal pad was apparently photocopied before being returned to Bremer, but neither the original document nor the copies were included in the file.

The report, based on interviews with two special agents assigned to guard Bremer, provides the "gist of the three pages," in which Bremer also recorded "his best recollection of detectives and agents with whom he came in contact."

Bremer, who was released from prison earlier this month for good behavior after serving 35 years of a 53-year sentence, has shunned interviews and never publicly expressed remorse over the shootings.

The 57-year-old wrote letters during a parole process in 1996 and 1997 arguing that Wallace, a "segregationist dinosaur," was different from other politicians.

"They are extinct, not endangered, by an act of God," Bremer wrote in the letter.

Bremer is reported to be living in a halfway house in Cumberland, Md.

The FBI file, stored in four boxes and containing thousands of pages of memos and correspondence, was given to the Alabama Department of Archives and History by the Wallace Museum Foundation in 2006 as part of a larger donation of the late governor's papers.

The file documents FBI's investigation and attempts to piece together Bremer's movements before the shooting in a Laurel, Md., shopping center parking lot May 15, 1972.

Bremer kept a diary for 2? months before the shooting, hiding the first half of the book under a Milwaukee viaduct; the second half, which law enforcement seized when they arrested him, was published as "An Assassin's Diary" in 1973.

The FBI file documents extensive efforts by agents to locate the first portion of the diary, which was not recovered until 1980. Bremer asked after the shooting if he could sell his book.

Zarvos said he had no concern over Bremer's release.

"I let the judicial system work, and I think it works fine," he said. "If Maryland authorities thought he was ready to be released, that's fine with me."

Arthur Bremer, one of four sons, was born in Milwaukee, Wisconsin on 21 August 1950. His father, William Bremer, was a truck driver. Arthur hated school and later wrote: "No English or History test was ever as hard, no math final exam ever as difficult as waiting in a school lunch line alone, waiting to eat alone... while hundreds huddeled & gossiped & roared, & laughed & stared at me."

After leaving school Bremer worked as a busboy at the Milwaukee Athletic Club. However, his habit of talking to himself disturbed the customers and some believed he was suffering from paranoia. In October, 1971 it was decided to give him a new job working in the kitchen. Bremer was unhappy with this demotion and the following month obtained a job as a school janitor.

While working as a school janitor he met 15-year-old girl, Joan Pemrich. After three dates Joan refused to see him anymore as she considered him to be "goofy" and "weird". On 13th January, 1972, Joan's mother told Bremer to leave her daughter alone. Soon afterwards Bremer purchased two handguns, a .38 caliber pistol and a 9-mm Browning automatic. After a incident where he fired bullets into a ceiling he was arrested by the police in Milwaukee. After undergoing a psychiatric evaluation he was charged with and fined for disorderly conduct.

In March, 1972, Bremer attended a George Wallace campaign meeting at Milwaukee's Red Carpet Airport Inn. At the end of the evening Bremer picked up a bundle of posters, bumper stickers and a Wallace lapel button. Over the next few days he began pasting posters on the lamposts in Milwaukee.

On 15th May, 1972, Bremer tried to assassinate George Wallace at a presidential campaign rally in Laurel, Maryland. Wallace was hit four times. Three other people, Alabama State Trooper Captain E. C. Dothard, Dora Thompson, a Wallace campaign volunteer, and Nick Zarvos, a Secret Service agent, were also wounded in the attack.

The arrest of Arthur Bremer (15th May, 1972)

Mark Felt of the Federal Bureau of Investigation immediately took charge of the case. According to the historian Dan T. Carter (The Politics of Rage), Felt had a trusted contact in the White House: Charles Colson. Felt gave Colson the news. Within 90 minutes of the shooting Richard Nixon and Colson are recorded discussing the case. Nixon told Colson that he was concerned that Bremer might have ties to the Republican Party or, even worse, the Presidents re-election committee. Nixon also asked Colson to find a way of blaming George McGovern for the shooting.

Over the next few hours, Colson and Felt talk six times on the telephone. Felt gave Colson the address of Bremer's home. Colson now phoned E. Howard Hunt and asked him to break-in to Bremer's apartment to discover if he had any documents that linked him to Nixon or George McGovern. According to Hunt's autobiography, Undercover, he disliked this idea but made preparations for the trip. He claimed that later that night Colson calls off the operation.

At 5:00 p.m. Thomas Farrow, head of the Baltimore FBI, passed details of Bremers address to the FBI office in Milwaukee. Soon afterwards two FBI agents arrived at Bremers apartment block and begin interviewing neighbours. However, they do not have a search warrant and do not go into Bremers apartment.

At around the same time, James Rowley, head of the Secret Service, ordered one of his Milwaukee agents to break into Bremers apartment. It has never been revealed why Rowley took this action. It is while this agent is searching the apartment that the FBI discover what is happening. According to John Ehrlichman, the FBI was so angry when they discovered the Secret Service in the apartment that they nearly opened fire on them.

The Secret Service took away documents from Bremers apartment. It is not known if they planted anything before they left. Anyway, the FBI discovered material published by the Black Panther Party and the American Civil Liberties Union in the apartment. Both sets of agents now left Bremers apartment unsealed. Over the next 80 minutes several reporters enter the apartment and take away documents.

Charles Colson also phoned journalists at the Washington Post and Detroit News with the news that evidence had been found that Bremer is a left-winger and was connected to the campaign of George McGovern. The reporters were also told that Bremer is a dues-paying member of the Young Democrats of Milwaukee. The next day Bob Woodward (Washington Post) and Gerald terHost (Detroit News) publish this story.

The following day that the FBI discovered Bremers 137-page written diary in his blue Rambler car. The opening sentence was: "Now I start my diary of my personal plot to kill by pistol either Richard Nixon or George Wallace." Nixon was initially suspected of being behind the assassination but the diary gets him off the hook. The diary was eventually published as a book, An Assassin's Diary (1973).

Bremers trial lasted only five days. His attorney, Benjamin Lipsitz argued that Bremer was was a "schizophrenic" who could not be held responsible for his actions. Eight psychiatrists and two psychologists testified but they were divided on the issue of his sanity. Bremer was convicted of attempted murder and sentenced to 63 years in prison. In August 1972, three appeal judges reduced Bremer's sentence to 53 years.

George Wallace survived the assassination attempt. He gradually developed the view that one Nixons aides ordered the assassination. To gain revenge he announces he is to become a third party candidate. However, Wallaces health has been severely damaged and reluctantly he had to pull out of the race.

In a comprehensive analysis of Hunts work published in The New York Review of Books in 1973, Gore Vidal argued that Hunt might have written the diary that was found in the car of Bremer, the man who attempted to assassinate George Wallace of Alabama.

In May, 1974, Martha Mitchell visited Wallace in Montgomery. She told him that her husband, John N. Mitchell, had confessed that Charles Colson had a meeting with Arthur Bremer four days before the assassination attempt.

In his book, The Taking of America, Richard E. Sprague argued that Donald Segretti and Dennis Cassini, supplied money to Bremer before he attempted to assassinate George Wallace. Others have claimed that Bernard L. Barker, one of the Watergate burglars, was used to pass this money to Bremer. Gore Vidal has also suggested that Bremer's diary was a forgery and had been written by E. Howard Hunt.


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #34 
Case against ‘Pizza Connection’ suspect dropped

BY MICHAEL FRAZIER | michael.frazier@newsday.com
    November 27, 2007

The U.S. government had waited 20 years for a chance to prosecute Enrico Frigerio for his ties to the "Pizza Connection," a $1.5-billion drug enterprise that authorities said was run out of pizza parlors across the country in the mid-1980s.

But months after FBI agents delivered Frigerio to prosecutors, the government has had to drop the case because of a lack of evidence.

The key evidence -- audio and video tapes -- had been destroyed and because of that Frigerio was unable to receive a fair trial, according to motions filed Nov. 7 in U.S. District Court in Manhattan. Judge Shira Scheindlin dismissed the case Wednesday.

"We have been telling the court that the tapes were crucial for Mr. Frigerio to prove his innocence," his attorney, Peter Ginsberg of Manhattan, said.

The tapes were recordings of conversations with undercover agents, cooperating witnesses and Frigerio, according to prosecutors.

Frigerio, who returned to his native Switzerland during the weekend, was arrested Sept. 3 at Kennedy Airport. He had arrived in New York with a Swiss crew that was filming a documentary about his life, Ginsberg said.

Frigerio was unaware of the indictment against him, Ginsberg added.

In a pretrial hearing Nov. 15, an FBI agent testified that the secretly taped recordings were destroyed. It was later learned the government knew about the wiped-out original recordings since Oct. 1, Ginsberg said. Still, during the hearings, "the government continued to represent to the state and to Frigerio's counsel that the government planned to produce the tapes," he said.

The U.S. attorney's office Monday declined to comment.

Prosecutors said the recordings were connected to one of the most extensive narcotics investigations in history, the so-called "Pizza Connection." The Sicilian-based conspiracy was suspected of flooding heroin into America during a five-year period. Pizza parlors, including one in Forest Hills, were used as fronts for the drug-smuggling and money-laundering operation, authorities said.

In 1987, Frigerio was indicted on charges of extortion and narcotics conspiracy linked to the Pizza Connection, broken up by then-federal prosecutor Rudy Giuliani. His presidential campaign declined to comment Monday.

Ginsberg said yesterday his client is pondering whether to sue the government over civil rights violations.

"It is simply outrageous that the government kept a 65-year-old man in jail for months, knowing that it didn't have sufficient evidence to prosecute the case," he said.

Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #35 

Protest In Front Of Regional FBI Office

Twin Falls

View low-speed video View hi-speed video
Protest In Front Of Regional FBI Office 11/26/07

A group of Magic Valley Residents protested yesterday on Shoshone Street in front of Regional Office for the FBI. Those present say they were protesting police brutality and unequal legal rights towards Latinos in Minidoka and Cassia counties.

Several members of the group say they've filed reports alleging battery and witness intimidation in several incidents, which they claim have been ignored by law enforcement agencies. One member of the group said they plan to get louder with their message to educate the public on discrimination against Hispanics.


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #36 
December 3, 2007

U.S. Department of Justice

Office of the Inspector General

SAC Glenn G. Powell

Investigation Division

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20530-0010

Re: Current and Former FBI Agents Involvement in Allowing an Informant to Commit Multiple Murders

Dear Mr. Powell:

In the course of my investigation, initially undertaken for congressional interest purposes, my now deceased colleague Dr. Stephen Dresch and I identified a mosaic pattern involving mal-, mis- and nonfeasance within the system of federal criminal justice, especially the Federal Bureau of Investigation but also offices of several U.S. Attorneys.

In light of the former court decision held by Honorable Judge Sifton in United States v. Persico, CR-92-0351, 1997 WL 867788 (E.D.N.Y. March 13, 1997, J. Sifton) and the recent decision of Honorable Judge Gustin Reichbach in State v. R. Lindley DeVecchio, Indictment No. 6825/05; despite a collapse in the later case the opinions of these two separate courts have enhanced and strongly confirmed our previous and ongoing congressional interest and reports.

It is for this reason that the office of Senator Charles Grassley has suggested that we notify DOJ OIG through formal written notification regarding a serious concern for the apparent failure of established systems of accountability and correction regarding a former agent (on pension and with attorneys fees partially paid by the DOJ) and current agents which alarmingly resulted in deadly consequences. Specifically, top echelon informant (TEI) Gregory Scarpa Sr. was given immunity, authorization and financial compensation from the FBI and the offices of the U.S. Attorney EDNY to commit violent crimes resulting in coerced confessions, hospitalizations, and death.

Equally troubling TEI Scarpa regularly gave false information to include implicating others in murders that they did not commit while diverting the attention away from him. The FBI knew his intelligence was false and still paid him for that information. Agent Christopher Favo, Agent Fanning, and OCID Joint Task Officer Patrick Maggiore testified in the Cutolo trial about their full knowledge that Scarpa was committing these murders. And on January 6, 1992 Detective Higgins tried to warn the potential target of a hit only to realize that the following day Scarpa had successfully murdered that target. Mr. Nicholas Nicky Black Grancio was the target. Coincidentally, Scarpas intelligence projected a higher interest than human life, that of which the FBI had an obligation to protect. (See Scarpa Chronology Attached)

A brief indication of our confirmed analysis is reflected below in Judge Siftons opinion:

Scarpa had a propensity and motive to continue to kill in order to dispel the widespread belief that he was an informant. His apparent distain for Mr. Russo is evident by his incessant complaining that the Russos were not doing anything during the war and that he was the only one doing the shooting. He blamed Mr. Russo for crimes and murders he (Scarpa) unquestionably committed.

Honorable Judge Gustin Reichbachs recent decision coincides with Judge Siftons former decision and states in part the following:

In keeping with his treacherous nature, he also provided information to the FBI that was purposely deceptive and untrue in an attempt to point the finger of accusation away from his own misdeeds and on to that of gang rivals. He provided information on the attempt to kill Joe Waverly Cacace without indicating that he himself was involved. Similarly, he blamed on others the murder of Nicky Black Grancio that he had committed.

They gave Scarpa virtual criminal immunity for close to 15 years in return for the information, true and false, he willingly supplied. Indeed, this court is forced to conclude that Scarpas own acknowledgment of criminal activity to the FBI could only be explained by his belief that the agency would protect him from the consequences of his own criminality, which the record suggests is what they did.

In August, 2007 during the Kastigar hearing in the trial of State v. R. Lindley DeVecchio, I testified that informant Carmine Imbriale had been wired up by Agent Christopher Favo and this particular tape caught Scarpa admitting to the murders of Vincent Venus Fusaro, and the attempted murder of Joe Waverly Cacace. Carmine Imbriale was arrested on February 21, 1992 and began cooperating immediately thereafter. It is believed that this tape was recorded between February 21, 1992 and February 27, 1992. This particular tape was a critical piece of forensic evidence boldly displaying Scarpas murderous rampage. It was withheld from all of the trials that were ongoing during the Persico-Orena war and was not known by anyone outside of the U.S. Attorneys office Eastern District of New York or the FBI until I testified to it during the Kastigar hearing in mid August 2007.

After Carmine Imbriale reported in February 1992, first-hand, that Scarpa admitted responsibility for the shooting of Joe Waverly Cacace, Favo claimed that he still did not believe there was probable cause to arrest Scarpa until Joseph Ambrosino began cooperating in June 1992 yet Scarpa was not arrested until August 30, 1992. This was a six month period of free reign for Scarpa to commit multiple homicides which he successfully accomplished despite their full knowledge of Scarpas actions. Agent Jeffrey Tomlinson gave a formal statement to OPR on April 6, 1994 explaining that he couldnt understand why when his office had both Imbriale and Ambrosino identifying Scarpa, Sr. as participating in a homicide why Scarpa would continue to be operated. He further stated that if this were his source he would have gone to the U.S. Attorneys to obtain a warrant for his arrest.

Accentuating this disturbing scenario on March 2, 1992 Scarpa was closed as a top echelon informant by ASAC Donald North due to credible information that Scarpa may be involved in a possible contract murder of someone incarcerated. Within that same month NYPD had plans to arrest Scarpa on weapons possession. Agent Favo and Agent DeVecchio immediately intervened on Scarpas behalf approaching Assistant U.S. Attorney George Stambolitis attempting to assure that Scarpa would remain on the streets. The agents explained that Scarpa could conceivably provide much more information as a source then he could if he were arrested on weapons possession however Scarpa was no longer a source he had already been closed by ASAC Donald North. Moreover, North gave a statement to OPR on July 26, 1994 explaining that he ordered DeVecchio to discontinue all contact with Scarpa.

In April 1992, Agent DeVecchio falsified information to FBI headquarters in an effort to reopen Scarpa as an informant. To reopen Scarpa he had to state that he was not participating in violent crimes. Scarpa was subsequently reopened on April 8, 1992.

Agent Favo eventually became concerned about his own knowledge of and complicity in the Scarpa/DeVecchio affair and said in a formal statement to OPR on April 4, 1994 that he was certain he would confront the DeVecchio/Scarpa issue when on the witness stand in the upcoming trials and in the end be held responsible for not reporting his dealings with DeVecchio.

Coinciding with the above and below statements Honorable Judge Gustin Reichbach confirmed this in his recent opinion:

Not only did the FBI shield Scarpa from prosecution for his own crimes, they also actively recruited him to participate in crimes under their direction. That a thug like Scarpa would be employed by the federal government to beat witnesses and threaten them at gunpoint to obtain information regarding the deaths of civil rights workers in the south in the early 1960s is a shocking demonstration of the governments unacceptable willingness to employ criminality to fight crime.

Credible evidence was presented that indicated that the defendant (Former Agent R. Lindley DeVecchio) was so eager to maintain Scarpa as an informant that he was willing to bend the rules, including sending misinformation to headquarters in order to re-open him as an informant. Under all circumstances it would have been impossible for the FBI not to appreciate that Scarpa was involved in violence. And if the Bureau was not aware of it, it would suggest a level of incompetence that this Court is not prepared to attribute to this vital law enforcement agency.

The federal documents that I possess appear to show that Scarpa has been working with the FBI since 1955. The marriage between Scarpa and the FBI was so complex and entailed that when Scarpa felt concerned or intimidated by other authorities he would then threaten to expose the FBIs covert use of his services as exhibited in the governments document dated October 9, 1973. Scarpa called the FBI Newark office threatening to reveal everything, scheme and technique imaginable because of what was being done to him. This bold outburst was reflecting his work of kidnapping, beating, disrobing, using tools of torture, causing sever hunger, and coercing confessions from unsuspecting targets of the FBI in the 1950s and 1960s.

Secondly, I would like to address concerns regarding witness tampering related to State v R. Lindley DeVecchio and the additional subject matter of possible obstruction of justice.

As reported in May 2006 former Agent Andris Kurins, Agent Levinson, and others were alleged participants in witness tampering of Mr. Lawrence Mazza and others. Since my last correspondence to your office I have once again been notified that former agents were improperly using their FBI badges and caused such distress to a key witness that the individual felt unquestionably strong about having to request a formal identification change.

Again in the same case State v R. Lindley DeVecchio the Brooklyn District Attorneys office had considerable difficulty in gaining the needed assistance from the FBI in obtaining critical documents relevant to their case. On February 28, 2007 I contacted Senator Charles Grassleys office to express significant concern related to what appeared to be obstruction of justice on this matter and shortly thereafter Senator Grassley addressed it in a formal hearing. It has been reported in the NY Post by Brad Hamilton that DA Hynes did not receive the requested documents until only days prior to the trials start. These appalling actions should not go unaddressed.

In conclusion, I believe your office would appreciate the knowledge that I have recently been contacted with information regarding several possible witnesses that are prepared to substantiate under congressional subpoena and hearings the following information:

In 1993 a government witness gave the FBI and U.S. Attorneys EDNY a specific name and telephone number that Scarpa Sr. was using to directly contact his law enforcement source these records appear to have never been used for the OPR investigation on R. Lindley DeVecchio

An individual has recently come forward who claims to have been an eye witness to the Scarpa/FBI kidnapping of an appliance salesman during the civil rights era. The kidnapped individual was brutally beaten by Scarpa in an effort to obtain a confession about targets of FBI interests. I currently hold legal documents related to this information and can make available the former District Attorney who was a direct party to that case.

An individual who did not receive the opportunity to testify prior to the collapse of the case but who remains available was allegedly a direct witness to viewing Scarpa give Agent DeVecchio money. This individual was not a member of organized crime or a defendant in any trials.

I look forward to hearing from your office at your earliest convenience.

Respectfully Submitted,

Angela Clemente

Cc: Senator Charles Grassley

Attorney David Schoen

Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #37 
Green Scare anniversary Protest Calls Out Snitches at FBI Headquarters
by WSQT Guerrilla Radio 87.9 FM in DC ( wsqtradio [at] hushmail.com )
Sunday Dec 9th, 2007 3:09 PM
On Dec 8, Potomac Earth First!(DC/Potomac River bioregion) marched to the J. Edgar Hoover building(FBI) and read out the dishonor roll of snitches against pro-animal and pro-earth movements in the US. The list was not complete, but it is a lesson to those who would consider selling out their compatriots in this or any struggle
Audio: 2 min 59 seconds
original image ( 1981x1259)
original image ( 1981x1259)

One DC marcher said that because of a snitch, the punk house he was part of had to move. Why? Because they were feeding the people on their own block! If this is how people are treated for feeding people, you can imagine how people are being treated for things like liberating mink, disabling bulldozers,or running anti-HLS websites.

Snitches called out include the notorious Anna(responsible for Eric McDavid and creating two more snitches), Jake Fergerson(responsible for the death of eco-warrior Avalon), former Earth First! Journal editor Lacy Fillbob, Kevin Tubbs, Stanley Myerhog, and others.

A song sung during the protest goes like this:

We like the planet
We like the animals
We support the ELF(ALF)
Free political prisoners!

Hey FBI-people who love "Elves" don't love snitches, and know exactly who is responsible for the Green Scare!

Photos courtesy of Isis

If you are interested in seeing more, they are here:



Raising the Earth First! Flag
by WSQT Guerrilla Radio 87.9 FM in DC Sunday Dec 9th, 2007 3:09 PM
original image ( 1321x837)
original image ( 1321x837)

Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #38 

a couple of hard reads about a death squad called the FBI  using your tax dollars to hurt people.I guess that makes you a co-enabler



Sharpton calls for rejection of new top cop

December 10, 2007
BY FRAN SPIELMAN City Hall Reporter/fspielman@suntimes.com

The Rev. Al Sharpton urged the City Council today to reject Mayor Daley’s appointment of career FBI agent Jody Weis as police superintendent — and demanded that the U.S. Justice Department consider placing the Chicago Police Department in receivership — to stop what he called “unchecked police misconduct.”

Sharpton threatened to travel around the world to undermine Chicago’s chances of hosting the 2016 Summer Olympic Games unless the mayor agrees to 10 demands.
» Click to enlarge image
Rev. Al Sharpton urged the City Council to reject the appointment of a new police chief outside Mayor Daley's office at City Hall.

(Jean Lachat/Sun-Times)

They include: Removing the mayor as the final authority to make recommendations for firing and suspending wayward police officers; releasing the list of 662 officers most frequently accused of excessive force; and allowing disciplinary complaints alleging misconduct toward civilians to be filed anonymously and without a statute of limitations.

Sharpton also demanded the realignment of police beats, a Justice Department investigation of the police department and the immediate firing of two police officers accused of sexually assaulting a West Side resident with a screwdriver. The city has agreed to a $4 million settlement in the case, but the officers remain on the job.

Sharpton also wants a community representative to sit on police “roundtables,” which probe police-involved shootings right after they occur.

At a news conference outside the mayor’s office, Sharpton threatened to turn Daley’s Olympic dream into a nightmare unless his demands are met. He called it the height of “arrogance” that Daley had chosen Weis without input from the African-American community, which is most victimized by both crime and police brutality.

“I would actually take some of the victims [of police brutality] to some of the international spots to talk to some of the Olympics Committee people. I would hope that would not become necessary. But, when you are in a city where you can have screwdrivers stuck up your rectum — and where 25 percent of the shootings by police are off-duty cops —you have to do what is necessary to make City Hall understand that our lives are just as important as anyone else in Chicago,” Sharpton said.

Report: Feds Probing Sharpton Finances
5 hours ago

NEW YORK (AP) — Federal authorities subpoenaed financial records and employees in an apparent probe of the Rev. Al Sharpton's 2004 presidential bid, nonprofit civil rights group and for-profit businesses, newspapers reported Thursday.

As many as 10 Sharpton associates were subpoenaed Wednesday to testify before a federal grand jury in Brooklyn on Dec. 26, his lawyer told the Daily News.

"Here we go again," Sharpton, whose various ventures have come under scrutiny before, told the New York Post. "Whatever it is, it's part of the territory. I'm a public figure."

Spokeswoman Rachel Noerdlinger said Sharpton would "thoroughly address" the reports at a press conference Thursday morning.

Sharpton's associates were told to provide investigators with financial records from the campaign and roughly six Sharpton-related businesses, as well as personal financial documents of Sharpton and his wife, the newspaper said.

The FBI and Internal Revenue Service are seeking the records, which go back to 2001, according to the Daily News.

An FBI agent who answered the phone at the agency's New York headquarters declined to comment, and an agency spokesman did not immediately return a telephone message. An IRS spokesman did not immediately return phone calls.

"It was like a sting or a raid," said Carl Redding, Sharpton's chief of staff for eight years during the 1990s. "They converged on everybody."

Redding said FBI agents awoke him at 6:30 a.m. Wednesday with a subpoena to testify and to bring records to the grand jury, but would not tell him the reason for the investigation.

Several staffers from the National Action Network, a Sharpton-led civil rights organization, also got subpoenas to testify, said Sharpton lawyer Michael Hardy. Sharpton himself did not receive a subpoena, the Daily News said.

Sharpton spokesman Charlie King said the minister and the National Action Network were cooperating with the probe. He said he had "zero idea, not a hint" what the authorities were looking for.

"The irony of this is we've been working with a number of government agencies to make sure that we're up to speed on all of our outstanding paperwork," he said.

Hardy was sanguine about the developments. "I can't think of a time when the Rev. Sharpton wasn't under investigation," he said.

Sharpton agreed in 2005 to repay the government $100,000, plus interest, for taxpayer money he received during his failed effort to win the Democratic presidential nomination the year before, though he denied wrongdoing.

The Federal Election Commission had determined that he spent more of his own money on the campaign than the qualifications for federal matching funds allow.

In 1993, Sharpton pleaded guilty to not filing a state income tax return in 1986.

Sharpton maintains heightened security as threats increase

By Hazel Trice Edney, NNPA Editor-in-chief
December 10, 2007 talkback

WASHINGTON (NNPA) - The Rev. Al Sharpton, looking back on a year of volatile civil rights and race cases, says despite the false alarm when a prisoner sent a harmless substance to his New York headquarters last month, he is still constantly concerned for his life.

"We're getting all kinds of threatening calls. This is just one that hit the papers," says Sharpton in an interview. "Especially since Jena and then around the time of the Washington trip. Every time we're involved, we get threatening phone calls... It's a recurring problem because that's part of the down side of leadership that people don't see. People only see you out there on TV. But they don't understand that also makes you a target for every nut and bigot in the country."

Sharpton boosted his already escalated security protection after the FBI warned him and his staff on Nov. 21 that a New York state inmate had confessed to sending a powdery substance to him and at least six other civil rights organizations and news agencies. The FBI successfully traced the substance in the mail less than a week after Sharpton led the U. S. Justice Department against hate crimes. The white substance turned out to be only talcum power, Sharpton confirmed.

But, he says the high profile media coverage on the incidents has raised prospects for real threats.

"It works up kooks and copy cats. Whereas this cat may not have been real, he could have woke us up because now, somebody might think that's a good idea. So it causes a lot of concern."

Among his 33 National Action Network sites around the country, Sharpton says he has especially upscaled security in New York, Atlanta, Los Angeles, Detroit, Chicago and Miami because of the level of activism at those sites and some targeted threats.

"We've increased those who travel with us and we've increased those at our headquarters," he says. Reportedly, the FBI has also warned his staff to not open mail from certain addresses and police squad cars have been sometimes strategically parked outside of NAN headquarters.

Security has especially been boosted since the Sept. 20 march in Jena, La. In that march, tens of thousands of people pushed for justice in the case of the Jena Six, Black high school students charged in the beating of a White school mate during racial tensions after three nooses were hung in a so-called White tree then in the school yard.

The security concerns also come in a year in which the Alabama-based Southern Poverty Law Center has reported a 40 percent increase in hate groups since 2000. The FBI last month also reported an 8 percent rise in reports of hate crimes last year, from 7,116 in 2005 to 7,722 last year. Most were racial attacks.

Sharpton is quick to recall one of the key reasons that he takes the new threats seriously.

"You must remember I was stabbed once leading a march."

On January 12, 1991, he was protesting the killing of a Black teenager in the predominately White Bensonhurst neighborhood in Brooklyn, N.Y. when he was attacked and stabbed in the chest by Michael Riccardi, an Italian-American wielding a five-inch knife.

Riccardi, who was convicted of first degree assault and served eight of a 15-year sentence, said he had attempted to kill Sharpton because he thought it would make him a hero in his community. It was Sharpton's security detail that stopped that attack, apprehended Riccardi and turned him over to police.

"Of course we've got to pay more people, pay more for them to travel and all of that," says Sharpton. "But, we take these things seriously cause I know what they can be 'cause I almost got killed."


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #39 
I love how F.....ox viewers(the F stands for FBI CHANNEL) co-enable each other.Things are not much different at NBC CBS .. ABC....CNN
Keep supporting those F....ox sponsors you get what you deserve.

couple of uneasy reads

Son of "Waddling Bandit" suspect disappointed in FBI
Posted by The Oregonian December 19, 2007 11:06AM

Dennis Christie, who agreed to forfeit his house and a $500,000 appearance bond if his 71-year-old father had failed to appear in court on federal bank robbery charges, said this morning that he's disappointed with the way the FBI handled the case.

The FBI arrested and charged the elder Christie, retired Tillamook schoolteacher Robert A. Christie, in what it called the "Waddling Bandit" string of Northwest bank robberies over the past two years. He was suspected of robbing as many as 20 banks of $70,000 or more.

To get his father out of a federal prison on the charges, 45-year-old Dennis Christie offered his home and the other collateral. Yesterday, the Christie family found out the FBI had decided to drop the charges "in the interests of justice."

"I'm happy that he's out. I'm happy that it's over with," Dennis Christie said today. But, he continued, "obviously, we think it could have been handled better."

Christie said he believes the FBI could have discovered relatively easily that his aging father could not have been in at least some the cities where the robberies took place when the crimes happened. Access to phone, credit card and other records would have cleared up the questions quickly.

"I would think that within the first week, they should have" known they had the wrong guy, he said. "I mean, they had access to those phone records. I mean, they're the FBI right?"

"You see these TV shows, you get a mighty high impression of the FBI. The forensic files, the FBI files. You see them do all this forensic science. They can get a guy on a toothpick left at the wrong place, and then you get something like this... and it just seems like they should have been able to figure it out sooner. It's just kind of changed my opinion of the FBI."

1997 Congressional Hearings


Attorney for Dr. Frederic Whitehurst

Good morning. My name is Stephen M. Kohn, and I am an attorney for Dr. Frederic Whitehurst. Thank you very much for inviting Dr. Frederic Whitehurst to testify before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Crime. As counsel for Dr. Whitehurst in litigation currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, we are submitting this testimony on his behalf.


Dr. Whitehurst has been an employee of the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") since 1982. Prior to joining the FBI, he volunteered for three active combat tours with the Army during the Vietnam War. He received a number of military honors while serving in Vietnam, including four Bronze Stars and the Army commendation medal. He was also offered, but declined to accept, a Purple Heart. His war record was summarized by his commanding officers in his official military performance rating:

WHITEHURST is a truly outstanding soldier. His knowledge and ability have been demonstrated time and again. . . . He energetically applies himself to all duties and promptly and efficiently completes them. Devoted and personable, he stands out above personnel one and two grades above his.

Exhibit 1, ENLISTED REPORT (September 18, 1971).

In addition to his army commendations, at the age of 17 he was awarded the Navy-Marine Corps Medal for Heroism for risking his life to save a person drowning in a frozen lake. It is our understanding that at the time of the award he was the youngest person ever to obtain this honor. Exhibit 2 (newspaper article appearing in the January 17, 1965 edition of The Virginian-Pilot).

After his honorable discharge from the military, Dr. Whitehurst obtained a B.S. degree in Chemistry in 1974 from East Carolina University and in 1980 received a Ph.D. in Chemistry from Duke University Graduate School. He then performed post-doctoral research in chemistry at Texas A&M University from 1980 to 1982.

In 1981 Dr. Whitehurst applied for a position as a Special Agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). He was subjected to extensive pre-acceptance testing and background screening. He was "ranked" 69 out of the "2152 applicants in the system who were qualified for selection" as an FBI agent. Butler to Revell (January 27, 1982), excerpt attached as Exhibit 3. In addition, of the 52 "qualified Science applicants" he was rated number three. Id. The background screening found him to be "an outstanding person whose character, reputation, associates and loyalty are unquestionable." Id. The FBI noted that he was "thorough" and "would not quit when the chips were down." He was praised for having "high standards" and for his "commitment to this country." Id.

Dr. Whitehurst accepted an offer of appointment to the New Agents Class convening on February 22, 1982. He successfully completed his training as an FBI agent and was assigned to the field upon graduation from the FBI Academy. On June 6, 1989, Dr. Whitehurst was promoted to a position within the FBI Crime Lab in Washington, D.C. as a Supervisory Special Agent. Until 1996, Dr. Whitehurst worked as a chemist and an explosives bomb residue analyst in the FBI Materials Analyst Unit. His performance reviews and numerous letters of commendation demonstrate that Dr. Whitehurst's performance within the Crime Lab was exceptional. See Exhibit 4 (the cover pages of all of Dr. Whitehurst's official performance reviews from 1989-1995) and Exhibit 5 (a sampling of letters of commendation Dr. Whitehurst received between 1989-95).

Dr. Whitehurst's 1993 performance review accurately reflects his contributions to the FBI during the course of his employment:

Through SSA Whitehurst's exceptional dedication, perseverance and analytical abilities, the Unit has been able to respond to important cases, crime scenes and special events in a timely, very professional manner... No other matter of greater importance than the World Trade Center bombing investigation offers a better example of SSA Whitehurst's exceptional ability to get the job done under the most extreme, stressful, high visibility circumstances....

Exhibit 6, Declassified Performance Review of Dr. Whitehurst, executed by two levels of supervision on October 13, 1993.

In this performance review the FBI recognized that Dr. Whitehurst's scientific knowledge in the area of explosives residues was "unequaled in any other laboratory." The FBI properly considered him a "very valuable asset." The review stated as follows:

SSA Whitehurst has acquired a tremendous amount of experience, developed contacts throughout the world in the scientific community, and currently possesses skills in the forensic analyses of explosives and explosives residues which is unequaled in any other laboratory. He is a very valuable asset to the FBI Laboratory.

Exhibit 6, Declassified 1993 Performance Review of Dr. Whitehurst

As set forth in Exhibit 6, Dr. Whitehurst was considered by the FBI to be its most highly qualified bomb residue examiner and explosives expert between 1989 and 1995. As recently as April 17, 1995, just two days before the bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, the FBI again evaluated Dr. Whitehurst and found that his expertise in the "chemistry of explosives and explosives residues is rivaled by no one else in the [FBI] Laboratory." See, Declassified 1995 Performance Review of Dr. Whitehurst (executed by first and second line supervisors on April 10, 1995 and April 17, 1995, respectively).

At the time Dr. Whitehurst joined the Crime Lab, he began raising concerns about scientific misconduct within the FBI. He raised these concerns with his supervision, the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility ("OPR"), the Director of the FBI, the Department of Justice ("DOJ") Office of Inspector General ("OIG") and other administrative units within the DOJ and FBI. In spite of severe criticism from the DOJ and FBI for raising "indications" of misconduct, Dr. Whitehurst's "whistleblowing" did not impact on his actual work performance or his ability to perform exceptionally as a scientist. For example, on December 28, 1995 Dr. Whitehurst received his last performance review as an employee of the Crime Lab. Despite having provided public testimony critical of the FBI's conduct in the World Trade Center case, having been publicly identified as a "whistleblower" as a result of publicity surrounding the O.J. Simpson case and having been involuntarily transferred from all duties within the Crime Lab, he was still rated "exceptional" or "superior" in every performance category.


There are a number of regulations and an Executive Order which govern the reporting requirements of FBI agents. Dr. Whitehurst was fully familiar with these requirements and based his reporting activities on these various rules and regulations. These regulations required Dr. Whitehurst to report "indications" of "possible" misconduct, even if these indications were based on hearsay. In addition, these regulations require all FBI agents to "over-report" indications of misconduct. Dr. Whitehurst's reporting activities were fully consistent with these requirements. The FBI and DOJ, which have been highly critical of Dr. Whitehurst's reporting activities, have failed to properly apply the disclosure requirements when reviewing Dr. Whitehurst's conduct. For example, the Inspector General's report did not even cite to these mandatory disclosure requirements, let alone properly apply the regulations.

Executive Order 12731 ("EO"), was signed into law by President George Bush on October 17, 1990, and established standards of conduct for federal employees. Exhibit 7. The Office of Government Ethics (OGE) implemented a formal rule concerning this EO which covered all federal employees, including FBI agents. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) circulated a copy of the EO and the OGE rules to every employee of the DOJ and FBI, including Dr. Whitehurst. Exhibit 7. The importance of complying with EO 12731 was emphasized by the DOJ in a cover memo attached to the material: "These standards apply to all Department of Justice employees. Please read and retain them for future reference." Exhibit 7, Excepts from the U.S. Department of Justice "This Package Contains Important Ethics Materials, etc.," (undated).

Dr. Whitehurst, in compliance with DOJ requirements, read EO 12731 and the explanatory notes which clarified the meaning of the EO. Thereafter, he acted in accordance with these standards of conduct.

In relevant part, EO 12731 states: "Employees shall disclose waste, fraud, abuse, and corruption to appropriate authorities." Exhibit 7, quoting from Executive Order 12731, Part I Section 101(k)(emphasis added). The EO placed all FBI agents under a mandatory duty to report allegations of misconduct to the "appropriate authorities." Pursuant to this obligation Dr. Whitehurst made disclosures to the FBI OPR, the Director of the FBI, the FBI General Counsel and the DOJ. These reporting activities were required under the mandate of EO 12731.(1)

A specific concern was raised over the existence of "conjecture" contained in some of the letters Dr. Whitehurst filed with the OIG. This concern is without merit. The explanatory notes interpreting Executive Order 12731, written by the Office of Government Ethics ("OGE") and included as part of the final rule making governing the Executive Order, clarifies that even "conjecture" is protected under the mandates of EO 12731. These comments make explicit what is implicit in the Executive Order -- that federal employees had a duty to "over report" indications of misconduct and that the appropriate authorities would determine whether allegations were "spurious." The OGE explained this reasoning as follows:

Five agencies suggested changes to § 2635.101(b)(11) [the OGE Code of Federal Regulations provision which incorporated the requirements of Executive Order 12731, Part I Section 101(k)], the principle requiring disclosure of fraud, waste, abuse and corruption. The recommendation by two agencies to change "shall" to "should" was not adopted. Section 2635.101(b)(11) is a verbatim restatement of the principle enunciated in the Executive order and the recommended substitution of precatory for mandatory language would change the principle. The Office of Government Ethics does not share those agencies' concern that the principle will elicit frivolous reporting. The Government's interest in curbing waste, fraud, abuse and corruption is better served by over reporting than by under reporting, and the authorities to whom such disclosure are to be made can best determine the merits of allegations and ensure that harm does not result from any that are spurious.

Exhibit 7, quoting from Federal Register p. 35007 (emphasis added).

In addition, the OGE warned that agencies could not require employees to apply "complex legal principles" when determining whether to report potential "improprieties." Id. Thus Dr. Whitehurst, who read these regulations prior to filing any allegations with the Office of Inspector General, acted pursuant to mandatory authority when he reported potential violations of complex legal matters such as improper withholding of Brady information, potential perjury, and improper scientific procedures.

Not only was Dr. Whitehurst required to report his concerns pursuant to EO 12731, the OGE regulations, and the DOJ, the FBI's own internal procedures regarding employee conduct required that Dr. Whitehurst report every "indication" of misconduct, whether proven or not, to the appropriate authorities. The FBI Manual Administrative Manual of Operating Procedure, Section 1-22, states as follows:

Each employee has the responsibility to report promptly, any indication of possible exploitation or misuse of Bureau resources; information as to violations of law, rules or regulations, personal misconduct . . . .

Exhibit 8, (emphasis added).

Under the FBI MAOP requirements, Dr. Whitehurst had a "responsibility" to "promptly" report each and every "indication" of a "possible" violation of law. This is an extremely broad disclosure requirement consistent with EO 12731. Dr. Whitehurst's reporting activities were consistent with this regulation. The importance of aggressively supporting FBI employees who make disclosures under FBI MAOP rule Section 1-22 cannot be underestimated. In this case, many of Dr. Whitehurst's most important disclosures were based upon hearsay. For example, his allegation over false testimony in the Alcee Hastings case was based on second hand information. In order to perform his duty under the EO and FBI/DOJ requirements, Dr. Whitehurst was obligated to report unproven "indications" of misconduct to the appropriate authorities.

The FBI and DOJ's concern that Dr. Whitehurst's reporting activities somehow was wrong has no support under the law and controlling regulations. Indeed, it was the responsibility of the FBI and DOJ to actively encourage Dr. Whitehurst's reporting activities and to insure that these reports were properly investigated in order to determine which "indications" of "possible" misconduct were accurate.


Shortly before Dr. Whitehurst made his first disclosure of misconduct within the FBI crime lab to a non-FBI employee, Congress passed the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 ("WPA"). In that law a special provision was created to assist FBI whistleblowers. See, 5 U.S.C. § 2303 and the two statutory provisions referenced in that section, 5 U.S.C. §§ 1214 and 1221, attached hereto as Exhibits 9, 10 and 11. This required the Attorney General to implement protections for FBI whistleblowers. 5 U.S.C. § 2303(b). Moreover, it required the President of the United States to insure that regulations protecting FBI whistleblowers were created which were, at a minimum, "consistent" with the protections afforded other federal civil servants. 5 U.S.C. § 2303(c).

The President of the United States, the Attorney General, and the FBI flagrantly ignored this law. Between 1989 and March of 1997, no regulation or rule was implemented by the DOJ, the FBI, or the President protecting FBI whistleblowers in the manner mandated under the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989.

A brief history of the WPA of 1989 is necessary in order to understand how mandatory whistleblower protections within the FBI were never implemented. In 1978, Congress passed the Civil Service Reform Act ("CSRA") of 1978, Pub.L. No. 95-454, which contained a very weak and ineffective section purportedly protecting federal employee whistleblowers. The federal government (including the DOJ and FBI) issued very weak whistleblower protection rules. See, e.g., Vol. 41 Federal Register 27754, codified as 28 C.F.R. § 0.39 et seq. (Subpart G-2-Office of Professional Responsibility).

The CSRA of 1978 (and the DOJ regulations implementing these rules) did not provide employee whistleblowers a private right of action to adjudicate the legality of adverse actions, did not provide for monetary damages or attorney fees, and did not provide any time constraints for resolving disputes. Within the FBI, protection of whistleblowers was purely discretionary. Even if the Attorney General deemed protection appropriate, the whistleblower's only remedy was the granting of a mere "stay" of an adverse personnel action if the "facts and circumstances involved" justified such a stay. 29 C.F.R. § 0.39(c).

In 1989, Congress recognized that the CSRA of 1978 did not adequately protect whistleblowers, and became concerned about the "dismal effectiveness" of the 1978 CSRA. Marano v. Department of Justice, 2 F.3d 1137, 1140 (Fed Cir. 1993), citing 135 Cong. Rec. 564 (1989)(remarks of Sen. Levin). Congress enacted the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 to amend the serious flaws in the CSRA of 1978 and to "send a strong, clear signal to whistleblowers that Congress intends that they be protected from any retaliation related to their whistleblowing." 135 Cong.Rec. 5033 (1989)(Explanatory Statement of S. 20).

The WPA of 1989 significantly enhanced both the substantive and procedural remedies afforded to whistleblowers under the CSRA. Congress enacted a number of significant reforms, including the following:

Whistleblowers would have a private right of action;

Whistleblowers would be afforded due process in this private right of action, including the right to a discovery and an on-the-record hearing before an impartial administrative judge;

All of the burdens of proof necessary to prove an unlawful reprisal were lowered;

The government's burden of proof to rebut that an unlawful reprisal was taken was raised to the "clear and convincing" evidence standard;

Damages afforded whistleblowers were expanded, and attorney fees and costs were recoverable.

See, 5 U.S.C. §§ 1214 and 1221.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit summarized the policies behind the WPA of 1989:

The policy goal behind the WPA was to encourage government personnel to blow the whistle on wasteful, corrupt or illegal government practices without fearing retaliatory action .... Such encouragement is guaranteed by the substantially reduced burden that must be carried by the whistleblower to earn the WPA's protection . . . . A principal office of the WPA is to eliminate that disincentive and freely encourage employees to disclose what is wrong with our government.

Marano v. Department of Justice, 2 F.3d 1137, 1142 (Fed Cir. 1993).

The legislative history of the WPA of 1989 demonstrates that Congress was aware of the chilling effect on whistleblowers caused, in part, by the lack of protections afforded employees under the CSRA of 1978. Based on a number of studies, it became "clear" to Congress that the CSRA of 1978 "did not go far enough in its protection for whistleblowers. This included two surveys relied upon by Congress which showed that "an astonishing 70 percent of Federal employees with knowledge of fraud, waste, and abuse did not report it" to the proper authorities. In addition, the surveys found that the number of employees who "did not report government wrongdoing because of fear of reprisal" actually "rose dramatically" during the time period in which the CSRA of 1978 was in place. See, e.g., Vol. 135 Congressional Record at 4517-18 (March 16, 1989) (Remarks of Sen. Byrd)("In 1978, as a part of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, provisions were included to protect Federal whistleblowers. The need to strengthen these provisions were clearly demonstrated, however, by surveys conducted in 1980 and 1983 ...")(emphasis added); Id. at 4519 (Remarks of Sen. Metzenbaum)("Under the current law, Federal employees increasingly are afraid to come forward with information about Government fraud.")(emphasis added).

Congress recognized that, without the added protections afforded in the WPA of 1989 the "vast majority" of employees would be intimidated and not raise concerns:

We need stronger protections for whistleblowers. Under the current system, the vast majority of employees choose not to disclose the wrongdoing they see. They are afraid of reprisals . . . .

Id., p. 566 (Remarks of Sen. Grassley).

This is precisely the problem which Dr. Whitehurst and other FBI employees who witnessed the misconduct within the crime lab faced between 1989 and 1997. The very fear and intimidation Congress identified as existing within the federal work force under the pre-WPA conditions still exists within the FBI today.

When Congress passed the WPA of 1989 it determined that FBI employees would be subject to its protection. For example, Congress amended the statute covering FBI employees, 5 U.S.C. §2303, to expressly provide that important reforms included in the WPA of 1989 (i.e., 5 U.S.C. §§ 1214 and 1221) also would be applicable to FBI employees. Congress explicitly mandated that the rights of FBI employees would be protected "consistent with the applicable provisions of" 5 U.S.C. §§ 1214 and 1221. See, 5 U.S.C. §2303(c).

However, during the pendency of Dr. Whitehurst's concerns with the FBI and DOJ, the President, FBI, and Department of Justice never implemented this law. Not one regulation was placed into effect codifying the new laws for FBI agents and nothing was done to ensure that FBI whistleblower protection was consistent with the new standards set forth in the WPA of 1989.

Dr. Whitehurst was forced to pursue his "whistleblower" case without any of the protections Congress had given him. Instead of due process, he faced numerous investigations and attacks on himself and his reputation. Beginning in 1989, when he was suspended and placed on probation merely for disclosing truthful information about contamination within the crime lab, Dr. Whitehurst faced an unending campaign to terminate him from employment within the FBI and to discredit his scientific concerns. These attacks were outlined in a letter to President Clinton filed on January 29, 1996. Exhibit 12, Letter to President Clinton and request for an Individual Right of Action under the WPA.

Incredibly, the President, FBI, and DOJ simply refused to implement the mandated requirements and continued to utilize procedures which violated numerous important legal requirements when reviewing Dr. Whitehurst's allegations of retaliation. In fact, all of the procedures utilized by the DOJ IG in investigating Dr. Whitehurst's retaliation allegations were improper and did not follow the mandates of the 1989 WPA. Not only was Dr. Whitehurst denied all due process rights guaranteed under the WPA, the IG illegally commingled the investigation into Dr. Whitehurst's allegations of misconduct within the crime lab with its investigation into the unlawful retaliation and published the results of the retaliation investigation in a manner completely inconsistent with the WPA. See, e.g., Exhibit 10 (which prohibits the use of retaliation findings in administrative or civil proceedings without the express consent of the whistleblower). The DOJ explicitly denied Dr. Whitehurst's numerous requests that he be permitted to have his retaliation concerns adjudicated in a manner consistent with the WPA of 1989.

Some of the problems caused by the DOJ's denial of due process and WPA protection to Dr. Whitehurst are summarized as follows:

Denial of right to counsel. Both the FBI and DOJ ordered Dr. Whitehurst not to discuss certain matters with his own private attorneys. This unconstitutional interference with the right to counsel prevented Dr. Whitehurst from properly addressing many of the issues raised in the draft and final IG report;

Denial of basic due process. In order to present his concerns before the IG, Dr. Whitehurst requested access to FBI documentation which would have verified or otherwise corroborated his allegations. This request was denied. In addition, Dr. Whitehurst requested the right to prepare formal testimony to the IG, instead of relying merely on informal letters sent to an investigator. This request was denied and Dr. Whitehurst never had the opportunity to be called by his attorney and questioned under oath before the IG experts about any matter in which he had raised a concern.

The FBI and DOJ ignored Dr. Whitehurst's need to obtain documents in order to prove his concerns. In 1993 and 1995, Dr. Whitehurst filed a number of Freedom of Information Act requests in order to obtain these materials. The FBI illegally violated the Freedom of Information Act and prevented Dr. Whitehurst from obtaining the needed documents. After being forced to file a suit to obtain the documents, the Court ordered the production of the requested material. However, the FBI did not release any of the material until after the IG issued its draft report and none of the over 10,000 pages in released documents have been properly presented by Dr. Whitehurst to the IG. A cursory review of these materials demonstrates how important the FBI documents would have been in any fair or just review of Dr. Whitehurst's concerns. See, e.g. Exhibit 13 (which documents the abuse of the pre-publication clearance procedures); Exhibit 14 (which documents that the FBI was aware of the validity of many of the types of issues raised by Dr. Whitehurst); Exhibit 15 (which demonstrates that the FBI was fully aware of the validity of Dr. Whitehurst's concerns about the evidence introduced in a major bombing case, yet both the FBI and apparently the U.S. Attorneys office failed to provide this information to the defendant); Exhibit 16 (which demonstrates that the FBI was fully aware of a major contamination issue within the lab (i.e. the "walk-through area in the Materials Analysis Unit), yet took no action to correct this matter); and Exhibit 17 (which documented that scientific reports within the crime lab had been intentionally and materially altered in violation of lab policy).

One of the most disturbing revelations contained in FBI-released documents was correspondence between the FBI and DOJ IG. Exhibit 18. Letter from FBI OPR to DOJ IG.. They reveal a high level of cooperation between the FBI and IG. Instead of the independence Dr. Whitehurst had expected from the IG, the IG and FBI had entered into a secret deal, in violation of their own operating procedures, to allow the FBI full access to all of Dr. Whitehurst's letters, full access to the interviews of FBI employees and a co-equal role in writing the final IG report (although only the IG's name would be on the report). These agreements were reached behind Dr. Whitehurst's back and, had they been known, Dr. Whitehurst would have ceased cooperating with the IG. Only the intense public pressure resulting from the public attention concerning the crime lab generated by the public disclosure of Dr. Whitehurst's allegations during the O.J. Simpson matter forced the IG to back off from the agreements with the FBI. However, the complete lack of written procedures and the failure to institute regulations required under the WPA allowed this collusion to occur.

The failure to discipline FBI employees in the crime lab for engaging in racist conduct. Exhibit 19, FBI OPR documentation confirming Dr. Whitehurst's allegation regarding racist conduct exhibited by personnel. No disciplinary action was taken to correct the conduct identified in these documents.

The failure to undertake the review requested by Dr. Whitehurst's counsel which would have resulted in the identification and potential correction of all of the problems identified by the DOJ IG back in 1994. Exhibit 20, Kohn to Shapiro, Feb. 7, 1994.


As previously stated, on January 29, 1996, Dr. Whitehurst, through counsel, formally requested that the President implement the WPA of 1989 for all FBI whistleblowers and filed a "private right of action" on behalf of Dr. Whitehurst. The President and Attorney General initially ignored this formal request. When pressed, the Department of Justice denied Dr. Whitehurst the right to pursue his rights under the WPA of 1989 and stated that the IG investigation was the only remedy he would be afforded. Thereafter, on March 26, 1996, Dr. Whitehurst filed a complaint for injunctive and mandamus relief against the President, Attorney General, and FBI requesting that the WPA remedies be made available to Dr. Whitehurst and all other similarly situated FBI employees.

The government continued to vigorously defend its failure to implement the WPA of 1989. Dr. Whitehurst pressed on and filed a motion for preliminary injunction concerning the FBI and DOJ's failure to implement the WPA of 1989 for FBI employees. Finally, the government conceded that it must obey the law. On April 14, 1997 President Clinton issued a "MEMORANDUM FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL." Exhibit 21. This Memorandum "direct(ed)" the Attorney General to "establish appropriate processes" to implement the WPA of 1989 on behalf of all FBI employees. This historic directive was a necessary first step in establishing the legal protections mandated by Congress over eight years ago. The crucial question facing the DOJ and FBI is the manner in which the Attorney General implements the WPA of 1989. Congressional oversight is needed in order to insure that the "processes" established by the Attorney General to protect FBI whistleblowers is both fully consistent with the WPA and provides realistic protections to FBI employees.


In order to encourage FBI employees to report possible indications of misconduct within the FBI, it is imperative that the procedure established by the Attorney General to implement the WPA of 1989 is both fully consistent with that law and fully consistent with the goal of properly protecting FBI employee-whistleblowers. Without proper protections, misconduct within the FBI will never be uncovered and corrected. Congress must insure that the Attorney General's regulations implementing the WPA contain the following features which are either required under the law or are necessary in order to fulfill the Congressional intent behind the law:

The definition of protected activity must remain broad and consistent with President Bush's Executive Order and the FBI MOP. In addition, reporting misconduct to Congress and/or the DOJ IG must also be fully protected. Likewise, because misconduct will often implicate disclosure requirements of prosecutors as required under the U.S. Constitution (e.g., Brady v. Maryland), FBI employees who disclose potential Brady information in the course of official state or federal court proceedings must also be fully protected.

The body which adjudicates FBI whistleblower cases must be fully independent of the DOJ and FBI. It must have a sensitivity to the unique problems which face whistleblowers and an expertise in these matters.

The due process afforded FBI whistleblowers must be "consistent" with the WPA. The ex parte and arbitrary procedures currently employed by the DOJ and FBI must be completely abandoned.

The regulations initially drafted by the Attorney General must be submitted for public comment and submitted to the federal court currently reviewing this matter for final approval.

Respectfully submitted,

Stephen M. Kohn

Chairman, National Whistleblower Center and

Private Attorney for Dr. Frederic Whitehurst

3233 P Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20007

(202) 342-6980

(202) 342-6984 (Fax)

Dated: May 12, 1997

1. Numerous other FBI employees violated the disclosure requirements of EO 12731. The problems in the crime lab caused by the misconduct of certain employees and the failure of the crime lab to adhere to the basic standards of accreditation were well known to hundreds of FBI employees. The vast majority to these employees violated the reporting requirement set forth in EO 12731. These performance failures can be attributed to a number of factors, including the failure of the President, Attorney General and FBI Director to implement the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, the culture of intimidation which exists within the FBI, and the resistance of the FBI to outside oversight.

FBI Removes Four Crime Lab Workers, Including Whistleblower in OKC
by Associated Press

January 27, 1997

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The FBI has suspended a scientist-agent whose charges led to a still-secret Justice Department report critical of the FBI crime laboratory. Three other lab workers were removed from their positions because of the report.

A Republican senator said Monday the suspension of whistleblower Frederic Whitehurst "appears to be a reprisal.'' An FBI statement released Monday night denied the actions were taken "in retaliation for the actions of any employee.''

The FBI statement did not identify any of the employees by name and said only that, based on the inspector general's findings, four lab employees "who had major responsibilities in explosives investigations have been removed from their positions.'' They continue to receive pay and benefits while the bureau decided whether or not they engaged in misconduct.

The three employees, other than Whitehurst, were transferred out of the FBI lab but not suspended, according to several officials, who requested anonymity.

The FBI said it "does not believe any of the problems cited by the inspector general will preclude anyone from receiving a fair trial'' and disputes those who say the problems "have compromised any past, present or future prosecutions.''

Whitehurst, once an FBI crime lab supervisor, was placed on administrative leave with pay Friday afternoon and barred from entering any FBI building, even as a guest, according to a letter from acting lab Director Donald W. Thompson Jr. The FBI took Whitehurst's badge and gun, said his lawyer, Stephen Kohn.

The action came just days after FBI Director Louis J. Freeh received a report from the Justice Department's inspector general that officials said criticizes the work of some FBI lab employees and a report from a special investigative counsel who looked into an alleged press leak by Whitehurst.

Thompson's letter said only that Whitehurst was suspended "pending our review of information in the possession of the Department of Justice'' and added that the move "does not indicate that you have engaged in any inappropriate conduct.''

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, chairman of a Judiciary subcommittee on administrative oversight, wrote Freeh on Monday to demand that FBI officials appear Tuesday in his office to justify the action against Whitehurst.

"Recently, a Department of Justice official knowledgeable about the IG's investigation told me privately that Dr. Whitehurst had done a service for his country in bringing forth his information,'' Grassley wrote.

"The action taken by the FBI implies that he is being punished for `committing truth.' It appears to be a reprisal for his disclosures,'' Grassley wrote.

Kohn said that after Whitehurst's allegation about lab misconduct became known "he became a lighting rod for other employees to funnel information to the inspector general.'' Kohn said FBI officials became "very, very angry'' when they received the inspector general's report and learned that "Whitehurst funneled information directly from other FBI employees to the inspector general and the investigation mushroomed beyond what they had expected.''

Kohn said that was why Whitehurst, once rated by the FBI as its top expert on bomb residues, was barred from entering FBI buildings and from getting information from other employees.

The still-secret inspector general's report is being reviewed by FBI officials to determine whether any lab employees will be disciplined.

The inspector general hired a panel of outside scientists to evaluate the work of the lab after Whitehurst alleged in late 1995 that a pro-prosecution bias and mishandling of evidence may have tainted crime lab work or testimony on several high-profile federal cases. These include the World Trade Center bombing, the mail-bomb killing of a federal judge and a civil rights lawyer, and the Oklahoma City federal building bombing.

Prosecutors have decided not to use at least one lab employee as a witness in the Oklahoma City bombing case and in a bank robbery case in Ohio, sources said Monday, apparently to prevent defense attorneys from using the inspector general report to undermine any testimony by the employee.

Stephen Jones, counsel for Timothy McVeigh, who is charged in the Oklahoma City case, has deposed Whitehurst and indicated he may be called as a defense witness.

Nearly a year ago, Whitehurst was called to an interview by Special Investigative Counsel Joseph C. Hutchison, who was brought here from the Connecticut U.S. attorney's office to conduct the leak investigation.

Hutchison wrote Whitehurst's lawyers that "there is substantial reason to believe that your client ... is responsible for the unauthorized release of work-related information to Jeff Stein,'' a freelance writer who produced an article intended for publication in Playboy magazine.

At that time, Carl Stern, then Justice Department spokesman, said Playboy wrote the department to check the article's facts, which allowed officials to learn that the article would contain information and allegations about FBI employees that are protected from public release by the Privacy Act.

Stern said, "There is no criminal investigation looking into the conduct of Frederic Whitehurst. There's an administrative inquiry in connection with the leak of Whitehurst's communications with the department to a writer from Playboy magazine.

Report: FBI lab botched Oklahoma bombing evidence
OKC bombing March 22, 1997
Web posted at: 9:28 a.m. EDT

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Justice Department inspector general's office has determined that the FBI crime laboratory working on the Oklahoma City bombing case made "scientifically unsound" conclusions that were "biased in favor of the prosecution," The Los Angeles Times reported Saturday.

The still-secret draft report, obtained by the paper, also concludes that supervisors approved lab reports that they "cannot support" and that FBI lab officials may have erred about the size of the blast, the amount of explosives involved and the type of explosives used in the bombing.

According to the Times, the draft report shows that FBI examiners could not identify the triggering device for the truck bomb or how it was detonated. It also indicates that a poorly maintained lab environment could have led to contamination of critical pieces of evidence, the Times said.
FBI quote

The final draft of the report is expected to be released next month and will likely include FBI responses. The FBI has refused to comment until then.

Forensic evidence is an important element of the case against Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols, accused in the April 1995 bombing that killed 168 people and injured more than 500. McVeigh is scheduled to go on trial March 31.
Tightly sealed document

The draft is so tightly held that U.S. District Judge Richard Matsch last month signed a written order strictly prohibiting either side from discussing the report or providing it to others, the paper said. He also ruled lawyers could not use the report in pretrial hearings or during the McVeigh trial "in any form or for any purpose whatsoever."

The Times did not disclose how it obtained the draft report.

The investigation into the crime lab practices began in 1996 following complaints from FBI chemist and whistle-blower Frederic Whitehurst that the lab was not living up to its once-vaunted reputation. Although the report confirms many of Whitehurst's accusations, it also refutes a number of his charges.

"We conclude that Whitehurst's numerous other contentions lack merit," the Times quoted the report as saying.

Whitehurst may appear as a witness for McVeigh during the upcoming trial.
Justice Department 'troubled' by report

The draft report's harshest criticism was of David Williams, a supervisory agent in the explosives unit, the paper said. The inspector general's office said his analyses "are scientifically unsound, are not explained in the body of the report and are biased in favor of the prosecution."

It was particularly critical of his September 25, 1995, report on lab tests of Oklahoma City evidence.

"We are deeply troubled by Williams' report, which contains several serious flaws," the report said. "These errors are all tilted in favor of the prosecution's theory of the case. We conclude that Williams failed to present an objective, unbiased, competent report."

Those flaws reportedly include the basis of his determination that the main charge of the explosion was ammonium nitrate. The inspector general called such a determination "inappropriate," the Times said.

The draft report says FBI officials found a receipt for ammonium nitrate at defendant Nichols' home and, because of that discovery, Williams slanted his conclusion to match the evidence.

"He acknowledged that he reached his conclusion, in part, because Terry Nichols ... purchased ammonium nitrate and diesel oil prior to the bombing," the Times quoted the report as saying.

Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #40 

December 23, 2007


By William Fisher

A former U.S. Department of Justice ethics adviser who came to prominence as a whistleblower after she objected to the government's treatment of John Walker Lindh -- the "American Taliban" captured during the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan – has joined leading members of the U.S. legal community in calling on Congress to investigate the destruction of tape recordings of interrogations carried out by the Central Intelligence Agency. 

Jesselyn Radack told a news teleconference last week that the destroyed tapes are “part of a pattern.” She said, “There are some 5 million missing White House e-mails.  No one knows where the hit lists are from the U.S. Attorney massacre.  And now the CIA interrogation videotapes have been erased.  This is criminal.” 

She added, “Remember when the Justice Department prosecuted Enron and Arthur Anderson for destruction of evidence and obstruction of justice?  Now the Justice Department is trying to block congressional oversight and legal proceedings involving this latest scandal.”


Radack’s comments came during the launch of a new campaign, “American Lawyers Defending the Constitution.” The effort is backed by a statement signed by more than 1,300 lawyers and law students around the country, including former New York governor Mario Cuomo, former Reagan administration official Bruce Fein, leaders of legal organizations and more than 100 law professors in the U.S.


Their statement calls on House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers and Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy to hold wide-ranging hearings to investigate “unconstitutional and potentially criminal activity by the Bush Administration.”


The “TapeGate” furor erupted after the New York Times revealed in early December that the CIA in 2005 had destroyed at least two videotapes documenting the interrogation of two Qaeda operatives in the agency’s custody, “a step it took in the midst of Congressional and legal scrutiny about its secret detention program, according to current and former government officials.” An announcement was subsequently made by the CIA.


The videotapes showed agency operatives in 2002 subjecting terrorism suspects — including Abu Zubaydah, the first detainee in CIA custody — to severe interrogation techniques. In a message to his staff, CIA Director Gen. Michael V. Hayden reportedly said the tapes were destroyed in part because officers were concerned that video showing harsh interrogation methods could expose agency officials to legal risks. He also said the tapes no longer had intelligence value.


The destruction of the tapes has raised questions about whether CIA officials withheld information from Congress, the courts and the Sept. 11 commission about aspects of the program.


The CIA program that included the detention and interrogation of terrorism suspects began after the capture of Mr. Zubaydah in March 2002. The CIA has said that the Justice Department (DOJ) and other elements of the executive branch reviewed and approved the use of a set of harsh techniques before they were used on any prisoners, and that the DOJ issued a classified legal opinion in August 2002 that provided explicit authorization for their use.


Other participants on the telephone press conference included Michael Ratner, president of the Center for Constitutional Rights, a legal advocacy group, and Marjorie Cohn, president of the 6,000-member National Lawyers Guild.


Ratner, whose organization has played a major role in providing defense lawyers for detainees in Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere, underscored the importance of congressional action. He said, “For far too long Congress has been the handmaiden of the Bush administration’s undermining and subversion of basic constitutional rights. The right to be free from torture; warrantless wiretapping; jailing without habeas corpus; and disappearances into secret sites. Principles going back to the Magna Carta are at stake.”


He called on Congress to “do its job: defend the Constitution from its enemies.  Its enemies are the Bush administration.”


Ratner said, “Just announcing that investigations will be held and subpoenas will be issued is terribly insufficient unless Congress is willing to enforce the subpoenas by issuing contempt citations.  Congress has a constitutional duty to oversee the activities of the executive branch and our entire system of government is threatened when Congress simply folds before an obstinate executive.”


Cohn, author of the recently published book, “Cowboy Republic: Six Ways the Bush Gang Has Defied the Law”, told us, “ From the illegal war in Iraq to the illegal torture of prisoners in U.S. custody to the illegal destruction of evidence by the CIA, the Bush administration has become an institution of lawbreakers.  Congress must hold hearings to investigate this lawbreaking, and should authorize the appointment of an independent prosecutor since Michael Mukasey cannot be counted to conduct an impartial investigation.”

Radack rose to prominence as a major whistleblower in the John Walker Lindh case. In the course of Lindh's criminal prosecution, the court ordered all documents associated with his interrogation to be turned over. After some documents were turned over, Radack was asked about the existence of more documents. At that time, she looked through the files and discovered that the bulk of her work was missing and had not been turned over. Radack was able to reconstruct much of her work, and informed her supervisor that her department had not complied with the court order. She was forced to resign before the documents were turned over. A criminal investigation into Radack’s actions  was eventually closed with no charges, but her case was referred to the state bar of Maryland, which eventually cleared her of all wrongdoing. She has never been called to testify before Congress.The Department of Justice (DOJ) said it had no knowledge that Lindh was represented by a lawyer prior to his interrogation, but this  position appears to be contradicted by material in Radack's files.

Radack told the news conference, “My e-mails documented my advice against interrogating Lindh without a lawyer, and concluded that the FBI committed an ethics violation when it did so anyway.  Both the CIA videotapes and my e-mails were destroyed, in part, because officials were concerned that they documented controversial interrogation methods that could put agency officials in legal jeopardy.” 

In a related development, one of America’s leading constitutional scholars said White House involvement in the CIA's decision to destroy videotapes documenting severe  interrogation techniques of suspected terrorists could constitute as many as six crimes.


Jonathan Turley, a professor at George Washington University law school in Washington appeared on CNN to discuss a report by the New York Times that four White House attorneys, including then-White House counsels Alberto Gonzales and Harriet Miers, participated in discussions with the CIA about whether or not the tapes should be destroyed.


Turley said, "There are at least six identifiable crimes here, from obstruction of justice to obstruction of Congress, perjury, conspiracy, false statements, and what is often forgotten: the crime of torturing suspects.


He added, "If that crime was committed it was a crime that would conceivably be ordered by the president himself, only the president can order those types of special treatments or interrogation techniques."


The American Lawyers Defending the Constitution statement, along with the list of 80 original signers, is available at http://www.americanfreedomcampaign.org/lawyers .


The American Freedom Campaign (AFC) is a joint project of AFC, the Center for Constitutional Rights, National Lawyers Guild, the Alliance for Justice, the Equal Justice Society, and the American Freedom Agenda. 


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #41 

Reader Email: Did My Gold Analysis Spot Informed Buying Before Bhutto Assassination?

December 30th, 2007

JJ writes:

I was stunned to see the news that Benazir Bhutto was killed within hours of your recent analysis on gold. As you said, gold did in fact rise further in the aftermath of that tragic event.

You wrote, “I find it interesting that some players see the need to take long positions right now; during a low liquidity time to trade.”

That seemed like a remarkable observation, in light of what was about to happen in Pakistan. Do you think that your gold indicators caught market activity related to pre knowledge of the assassination, or was it just a coincidence?

I think the answer, JJ, is that it doesn’t matter one way or the other. It doesn’t matter because there was no way to use the analysis to know that an international political figure was about to be assassinated. Sure, it’s interesting that the atrocity followed a strong move on gold during thin holiday trading, but as outsiders (people without privileged information), that’s all it will ever be to us. An interesting coincidence.

When I saw the news of Bhutto’s assassination, I thought to myself, “Ok, now I understand what that weird buying was probably about,” but it was after the fact. Remember that, at the time, my guesses were not even in the ballpark as the motivation behind the move. My speculation went like this:

It’s even more interesting if you read Paul Tustain’s recent analysis with December 31, 2007 as a date to watch. Indeed, the media is talking about the weak dollar, but the dollar is well off recent lows. My guess is that this is much more about Sterling and Euro holders who are frightened by those central banks’ recent decision to strap themselves to the mast of the sinking dollar.

And that might be right (or not), but there’s nothing in there about assassination, terrorism, Pakistan, etc. As any straight laced bean counter will tell you: the only relationship between my analysis and the assassination was chance.

However, as any [honest] trader or market operator will tell you, there are always insiders who know about major events before they happen. I saw weird things happen so many times in the market that, rather than just wrapping the coincidences in tinfoil and calling them conspiracies, I attempted to design a trading system based on the assumption that insiders were using their privileged information in the market before news hit. The trick was finding stocks to watch that had a low enough noise level to spot the signals. I wrote about this in detail in Insider Crimes, Funny Money and Options Rackets. There is no way (that I’m aware of) to apply a similar strategy to something like gold. There is far too much noise (which is great for the people who place trades based on their knowledge of future events). Likewise, there is probably no way—that you or I will ever have access to anyway—to derive actionable intelligence from the movement of commodity prices.

It’s just the unseen hand of the market, or a random walk, or not statistically significant, etc. Coincidences, in other words.

But hindsight is interesting, isn’t it?


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #42 
all the victims of police repression viewing this forum to lazy to pick up phone
and book some speaking engagements for themselves.
FBI Public Relations Unit might throw a few speaking gigs your way.


FBI agent to speak to Democratic Club

Miami Herald Staff Report


Reservations will be accepted until Friday to hear Barbara Moser-Gabner, a special agent for the Miami office of the FBI, who will be the guest speaker at the Arnold Klein Sunny Isles Beach Democratic Club meeting at 7 p.m. Monday at Denny's restaurant, 17550 Collins Ave., Sunny Isles.

The event is free for members; $5 for nonmembers. For information, call 305-868-3858, e-mail manfilms@thebeach.net, or visit http://www.sunnyislesbeachdemocrats.com.


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #43 

Original Content at http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_len_hart_080109_bhutto_knew_too_much.htm

January 9, 2008

Bhutto Knew Too Much About Bin Laden, 911, the CIA

By Len Hart

Bhutto's assassination by gun men was a pre-emptive strike! She might have exposed the CIA as the World's number one terrorist organization. Pakistan Dictator Pervez Musharraf, Bush's man in Pakistan, blames the victim. In some perverted sense, he may be right. Bhutto may have signed her own death warrant with the famous statement (censored by the BBC) that Bin Laden was murdered by Saeed Sheikh. [Her remarks found here]

Bhutto pulled the rug from under Bush's official 911 conspiracy theory. We must chalk up to official fraud and exploitation several "video tapes" that Bushies attributed to the world's arch fiend, Osama bin Laden, the Lex Luthor of terror. Bush critics are now confirmed; there is no reason to suppose that bin Laden ever stopped being a CIA asset. While alive, that is.
The assassination of Bhutto appears to have been anticipated. There were even reports of "chatter" among US officials about the possible assassinations of either Pervez Musharraf or Benazir Bhutto, well before the actual attempts took place.As succinctly summarized in Jeremy Page's article, "Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? The Main Suspects", the main suspects are 1) "Pakistani and foreign Islamist militants who saw her as a heretic and an American stooge", and 2) the Inter-Services Intelligence, or ISI, a virtual branch of the CIA. Bhutto's husband Asif Ali Zardari directly accused the ISI of being involved in the October attack.The assassination of Bhutto has predictably been blamed on "Al-Qaeda", without mention of fact that Al-Qaeda itself is an Anglo-American military-intelligence operation.Page's piece was one of the first to name the man who has now been tagged as the main suspect: Baitullah Mehsud, a purported Taliban militant fighting the Pakistani army out of Waziristan. Conflicting reports link Mehsud to "Al-Qaeda", the Afghan Taliban, and Mullah Omar (also see here). Other analysis links him to the terrorist A.Q. Khan.

--Larry Chin, Anglo-American Ambitions behind the Assassination of Benazir Bhutto and the Destabilization of Pakistan

A sub plot is equally interesting. A former MI6/SIS agent, Lt-Gen Mahmud Ahmad, supervised wired transfers of $100,000 to Mohammed Atta shortly before 9/11. Has anyone ever stopped to ask the obvious question: what the hell was a man who was going to die in a suicide Attack do with $100,000? According to Turkish intelligence, Ahmad is a paid CIA informant who claims to have trained six 9/11 hijackers. Turkish intelligence charges that Al-Qaeda is merely the name of a secret service operation designed to stir up trouble and exploit tensions around the world.
While the pakistani inter services public relations claimed that former ISI Director-General Lt-Gen Mahmud Ahmad sought retirement after being superseded on monday, the truth is more shocking. top sources confirmed here on tuesday, that the general lost his job because of the "evidence" india produced to show his links to one of the suicide bombers that wrecked the World Trade Centre. The US authorities sought his removal after confirming the fact that $100,000 were wired to WTC hijacker mohammed Atta from pakistan by ahmad Umarr Sheikh at the instance of gen mahumd. Senior government sources have confirmed that india contributed significantly to establishing the link between the money transfer and the role played by the dismissed ISI chief. while they did not provide details, they said that indian inputs, including sheikh's mobile phone number, helped the FBI in tracing and establishing the link. a direct link between the ISI and the WTC Attack could have enormous repercussions. the us cannot but suspect whether or not there were other senior pakistani army commanders who were in the know of things. Evidence of a larger conspiracy could shake us confidence in pakistan's ability to participate in the anti-terrorism coalition. indian officials say they are vitally interested in the unravelling of the case since it could link the ISI directly to the hijacking of the indian airlines kathmandu-delhi flight to kandahar last december. ahmad umar sayeed sheikh is a british national and a london school of economics graduate who was arrested by the police in delhi following a bungled 1994 kidnapping of four westerners, including an american citizen.

--India helped FBI trace ISI-terrorist links

The London Times reports that from 1999-2000 Louai al-Sakka, incarcerated in a high-security Turkish prison 60 miles east of Istanbul, trained six 9/11 hijackers in a mountain camp near Istanbul. Sakka is said to have been captured by Turkish intelligence and ordered released. After moving to Germany, he assisted alleged 9/11 hijackers.Shortly before 9/11, Sakka was allegedly hired by Syrian intelligence - to whom he gave a warning that the Attacks were coming on September 10th, 2001.In the meantime, Wikipedia has this information about the man Bhutto claims murdered bin Laden.
" was arrested and served time in prison for the 1994 abduction of several British nationals in India, an act which he acknowledges, he was released from captivity in 1999 and provided safe passage into Pakistan, apparently with the support of Pakistan and the Taliban (the hijackers were Pakistanis) in an Indian Airlines plane hijacking. He is most well-known for his alleged role in the 2002 kidnapping and murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl. Sheikh Omar Saeed was arrested by Pakistani police on February 12, 2002, in Lahore, in conjunction with the Pearl kidnapping,[4] and was sentenced to death on July 15, 2002[5] for killing Pearl. His judicial appeal has not yet been heard. The delay has been alleged to be due to his reported links with Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence.[6]Pakistani President, Pervez Musharraf, in his book In the Line of Fire stated that Sheikh was originally recruited by British intelligence agency, MI6, while studying at the London School of Economics. He alleges Omar Sheikh was sent to the Balkans by MI6 to engage in jihadi operations. Musharraf later went on to state "At some point, he probably became a rogue or double agent".[7]On October 6, 2001, a senior-level US government official told CNN that US investigators had discovered Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh (Sheik Syed), using the alias "Mustafa Muhammad Ahmad" had sent about $100,000 from the United Arab Emirates to Mohammed Atta. "Investigators said Atta then distributed the funds to conspirators in Florida in the weeks before the deadliest acts of terrorism on US soil that destroyed the World Trade Center, heavily damaged the Pentagon and left thousands dead. In addition, sources have said Atta sent thousands of dollars -- believed to be excess funds from the operation -- back to Saeed in the United Arab Emirates in the days before September 11. CNN later confirmed this. [1]"-- Omar Saeed Sheikh
Much of this was known but little publicized by the MSM. Few journalists dared challenge official conspiracy theories. Among those daring to get at the truth was Gore Vidal.
Vidal argues that the real motive for the Afghanistan war was to control the gateway to Eurasia and Central Asia's energy riches. He quotes extensively from a 1997 analysis of the region by Zgibniew Brzezinski, formerly national security adviser to President Carter, in support of this theory. But, Vidal argues, US administrations, both Democrat and Republican, were aware that the American public would resist any war in Afghanistan without a truly massive and widely perceived external threat.--Gore Vidal claims 'Bush junta' complicit in 9/11
It was not Bhutto who misspoke but Musharraf, whose comments may have already backfired. Indeed, Bhutto was murdered --not by terrorists as Musharraf would have you believe. She was murdered, gunned down, in fact, because she was the woman who knew too much and dared to reveal that Osama bin Laden had been murdered. She did not misspeak! She named names. She exposed the fraudulent nature of the Bush/Blair "war on terrorism". She stated --flat out --US policies cause world terrorism!

Musharraf just makes himself look worse with worse lies. As Bhutto's murderers were caught on video tape, the BBC was caught censoring a most important piece of the puzzle. If Osama is dead, Bush's war on terror is a treasonous fraud, a capital crime.
Was Afghanistan then turned to rubble in order to avenge the 3,000 Americans slaughtered by Osama? Hardly. The administration is convinced that Americans are so simple-minded that they can deal with no scenario more complex than the venerable lone, crazed killer (this time with zombie helpers) who does evil just for the fun of it 'cause he hates us, 'cause we're rich 'n free 'n he's not. Osama was chosen on aesthetic grounds to be the most frightening logo for our long contemplated invasion and conquest of Afghanistan, planning for which had been 'contingency' some years before 9/11 and, again, from 20 December, 2000, when Clinton's out-going team devised a plan to strike at al-Qaeda in retaliation for the assault on the warship Cole.

--Gore Vidal, The Enemy Within

Two questions must be asked about the Bhutto assassination: 1) Who benefits from it? 2) Who is lying about it? The most prominent liars are Pervez Musharraf who insists upon a ludicrous theory, easily disproven by widely distributed video tapes; and George W. Bush whose lies about "terrorism", bin Laden specifically, have been challenged as never before. If, as Bhutto charged, bin Laden is dead, the whole rotten edifice comes crashing down. The beneficiaries are not suprisingly George W. Bush and Musharraf. Musharraf, like Bush, will now crack down on "terrorists" though the policies of both create it! Bhutto dared expose the fraud and paid with her life for having done so. The axis of Bush/CheneyMIC will prop up the dictator Musharraf, manipulating his apparatus of state to meet the demands of personal ambition and corporate greed. And, yes! All are oil and power mad!

Authors Website: http://existentialistcowboy.blogspot.com/

Authors Bio: Len Hart is a Houston based film/video producer specializing in shorts and full-length documentaries. He is a former major market and network correspondent; credits include CBS, ABC-TV and UPI. He maintains the progressive blog: The Existentialist Cowboy

Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #44 


Ecological Strategies in Today's Art (part 2)


Ecomedia - Ecological Strategies in Today's Art, currently running at the Edith Russ Haus in Oldenburg, presents projects founded on progressive ecological models and conceive utopian horizons in the process. (Part One is here.)

Tue Greenfort's contribution to the show is a simple plastic bottle. Just a bottle... until you have a look at the title of the sculpture: “Producing 1 Kilogram of PET Plastic Requires 17.5 Kilograms of Water and results in air emissions of 40 grams of hydrocarbons, 25 grams of sulfur oxides, 18 grams of carbon monoxide, 20 grams of nitrogen oxides, and 2.3 kilograms of carbon dioxide. In terms of water use alone, much more is consumed in making the bottles than will ever go into them” (2004). I can't dream of anything more self-explanatory. The object is a 1.5-liters mineral-water bottle which, under the influence of heat, has melted down to the size of a half-litre bottle, and was then filled with tap water. The artist demonstrates that the production of a non-returnable bottle requires more water than it can actually contain.

Talking of which, there was a raft made of plastic bottles on the grass outside of the Edith Russ Haus building. It's Natalie Jeremijenko's office. At the exhibition opening, she invited people to jump on it and share with her their environmental anxieties. Best is to have a look at the video presentation that GOOD magazine made of the Environmental Health Clinic project.

GenTerra, by Critical Art Ensemble with Beatriz da Costa, used a harmless form of gut E. coli to educate the public about genetically modified organisms.

GenTerra is a fictional biotech company dealing with "transgenics" and driven by profit, but also by a sense of social responsibility. Products created through this process—-for example, transgenically modified foods—-have often caused controversy. GenTerra claims to produce organisms that help solve ecological or social problems

GenTerra is essentially a participatory "theater" comprising a lab, computer stations displaying the company’s informational CD-Rom, and a bacteria release machine. Scientists and artists are talking the public through the process and implications (whether they are purely profit-driven or feature some utopian qualities) of transgenics. Materials are then provided to allow people to get a hands-on experience by creating their own transgenic organism, using human DNA derived from blood samples. After that they become actively involved in risk assessment by deciding whether or not to release bacteria from one of petri dishes of the release machine. 11 of the dishes have non-transgenic bacteria samples taken locally, and one contains the transgenic bacteria. Should the dish with the transgenic bacteria be selected, a robotic arm will open the lid of the dish, and then replace the lid on the dish after about 5 seconds. The transgenic bacteria is in fact a benign, crippled lab strain that is released in laboratories on a routine basis.

This form of participatory experience attempts to make the whole issue less abstract and distant and by doing so, it provides the public with the critical tools to reflect on how significant the transgenic issue is and how it is going to reflect their everyday life.

The Critical Art Ensemble defense fund page informs us that the FBI is still refusing to return most of the tens of thousands of dollars worth of impounded materials. The reason for that is that the art collective was using the harmless bacteria and materials in several of their projects, one of them is GenTerra.

Andrea Polli had two projects in the exhibition, the beautiful The Queensbridge Wind Power Project is a video (which you can watch online) for transforming the Queensborough bridge into a site for gathering clean, renewable energy.

The second project she was showing is a collaboration with Joe Gilmore. N. is an artistic visualization and sonification of near real-time Arctic data.

Franz John's Turing Tables takes live seismological data and turns it into pictures, sound and movement.

Seismological institutes measure the vibrations of the Earth and exchange the data collected among themselves via automated internet-transfers. Turing Tables feeds into this human-machine-communication data stream and translates it into an installation which bathes visitors in audio renderings and projections of live measurements made by seismographs all over the world.

The project is not about the catastrophes that cause these movements in inhabited areas, but instead about the archaic feeling and consciousness that the earth is an organism, that it moves and that it can be understood as an organism in constant flux.

I liked 01.org's Reenactment of Joseph Beuys' 7000 Oaks, 2007. My first reaction when i saw the project was "oh! No, not flugly Second Life agaaain!" but this "synthetic performance" has the merit of bringing the spotlight on a very inspiring work. In March 1982, Beuys was at Documenta 7 in Kassel with a mission: planting of 7000 trees, each paired with a columnar basalt stone approximately four feet high above ground, throughout the greater city of Kassel. The last tree was planted posthumously in 1987 by is son. Beuys intended the Kassel project to be the first stage in an ongoing scheme of tree planting to be extended throughout the world as part of a global mission to effect environmental and social change; locally, the action was a gesture towards urban renewal. 25 years exactly after the planting of the first tree, Eva and Franco Mattes of 01.org (or rather their avatars) started stacking virtual basalt stones on Mattes' island in SL. SL inhabitants are invited to participate to the performance by placing stones and trees on their land.

Infossil had a huge banner hanging above the reception desk of the art space. The white on black text reflects about the dependence of electronic communication, that is of the "infossil", on the energy resources available, the fossil: coal.

Also on show: Sabrina Raaf's Translator II: Grower was painting grass on the wall; EcoScope, a communication tool developed by Transnational Temps, provides a context for discussing environmental affairs; 10 Commandments for the 21st Century, by Tea Mäkipää; Iñigo Manglano-Ovalle's You don’t need a weatherman; Christoph Keller's The Whole Earth, a projection on a weather balloon. White clouds over a blue sky form the perfect picture of the peaceful blue planet we live on, there's even piano music for perfect bliss. Every two minutes, a roaring aircraft brings us back to reality. Its passage takes one or two seconds but that's enough to spoil the idyllic vision (image); Yonic, a NGO working in Brazil to diminish pollution in the rain forest and find new solutions to old problems, showed the fanzine they publish on a yearly basis using handmade recycled paper.

Now that was a fantastic and energizing exhibition. If only we can get more people to see it, not just the already converted.


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #45 

FBI launches new attack on Puerto Rican movement

Published Jan 17, 2008 10:30 PM

On Jan. 11 the plaza in front of Federal Court in Brooklyn was filled with Puerto Ricans and their allies denouncing a new witch hunt against the pro-independence movement in their homeland.

Protest outside Brooklyn, N.Y.><br>Federal Court.

Protest outside Brooklyn, N.Y.,
Federal Court.
WW photo

The demonstrators, who numbered around 1,000, chanted, “Filiberto lives, the struggle continues!” and “FBI: terrorists, assassins, imperialists!”

On Jan. 10 and 11, similar demonstrations took place in Hartford, Conn.; Los Angeles and Oakland, Calif.; Chicago; Philadelphia; Cleveland; Fitchburg, Mass.; and Orlando, Fla.

In San Juan, P.R., more than 1,500 demonstrators marched in front of the Federal Court House with placards that read “FBI assassins.”

“Filiberto” refers to Filiberto Ojeda Ríos, a leader of the Ejército Popular Boricua-Macheteros, who was gunned down by the FBI right inside his home in Hormigueros, P.R., on Sept. 23, 2005. Now the U.S. political police agency is going after Puerto Ricans in New York City.

Three were subpoenaed to appear before a New York grand jury on Jan. 11 and a fourth is reportedly being hunted. The three are Tania Frontera, a graphic designer; Christopher Torres, a social worker; and Julio Pabón, a filmmaker. The FBI may also be looking for Héctor Rivera, another cultural worker.

Just two days after the subpoenas, a committee was set up in New York called the Hostos Jan. 11 Grand Jury Resistance Campaign. The movement is calling for no collaboration with the oppressive authorities. It states that this heightened repression is a violation of human rights and of Article 1514 of the United Nations Charter, which states in part that “the subjection of a people by foreign subjugation, domination and exploitation constitutes a denigration of fundamental human rights” and concludes that “any such people have a right to resist that foreign domination.”

A media conference at New York’s City Hall the day of the demonstration was well attended. Both events had an impact and the authorities agreed to a postponement of the grand jury. It was a tentative victory, but this struggle is not over and the movement remains vigilant.

The choice of Jan. 11 as the original date of the grand jury was an affront to the memory of one of Puerto Rico’s most revered pro-independence leaders, Eugenio María de Hostos. Born on Jan. 11, 1839, Hostos had been an abolitionist and an advocate of workers’ and women’s rights. He also supported a federation of the Caribbean islands.

After the murder of Filiberto Ojeda Ríos in 2005, popular outrage crossed party lines in Puerto Rico and pushed the conciliatory and pro-colonial government of Anibal Acevedo Vilá to launch an investigation into the FBI’s actions.

This past summer several articles in the press there exposed the role of the U.S. “security” company DynCorp in Filiberto’s murder. Like the Blackwater contract employees who murder innocent civilians in Iraq and New Orleans, these U.S. mercenaries have only one goal in mind and that is to kill and repress. Washington’s response to this inquiry has been to charge Acevedo Vilá with corruption.

In other words, the colonizer is saying to the occupied: “How dare you question us?” Washington’s plan may now be to put its colony in Puerto Rico under direct U.S. receivership.

Puerto Ricans have resisted U.S. culture and the imposition of English-only in schools, and over the years have formed liberation organizations such as the Nationalist Party, the FALN and the Macheteros. Now the movement and its allies are calling for the FBI and the U.S. Navy to get out of Puerto Rico. International solidarity is needed.

The pro-independence movement has come together to defend the sisters and brothers in the struggle. It is also demanding the freedom of political prisoners Oscar López Rivera, Carlos Alberto Torres, Haydée Beltrán Torres and José Pérez González.


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #46 
January 23, 2008

Washington D.C.
FBI National Press Office
(202) 324-3691

FBI Director Names New Associate Deputy Director and Assistant Director of Finance

Timothy P. Murphy has been named Associate Deputy Director (ADD) of the FBI, in charge of FBI personnel, budget, administration, and infrastructure. Mr. Murphy, a 19-year veteran, currently serves as Assistant Director of the FBI’s Finance Division.

“ Tim brings a wealth of experience and demonstrated leadership to the ADD position,” said Director Robert S. Mueller, III. “I have the utmost confidence that he will build on the progress in our core business functions, with a continued focus on critical administrative matters and strategic reform.”

Mr. Murphy entered on duty as a special agent in September 1988 . Since joining the FBI, Mr. Murphy has served in four field offices, including Newark, Tampa, Washington Field, and Cincinnati, in addition to four different positions at FBI Headquarters. While in the field, Mr. Murphy managed a variety of investigative matters, including counterterrorism, organized crime/drugs, as a pilot in the aviation program, and within the Special Operations, Technical Operations, Undercover Operations and Surveillance programs. Mr. Murphy also served as an Assistant Special Agent in Charge of the Washington, D.C. field office, as the Special Agent in Charge (SAC) of the FBI’s Cincinnati Division, and as a member of the Director's SAC Advisory Committee.

At FBI Headquarters, Mr. Murphy served in several positions including Supervisory Special Agent in the Executive Development and Selection Program, Unit Chief of the Senior Executive Service Unit, Unit Chief of the Director's Research Group and Special Assistant to FBI Director Mueller. As the Director’s Special Assistant, Mr. Murphy provided counsel to the Director on a variety of policy, budget, and administrative matters. He also assisted in the preparation for the Director's events and meetings, domestic and international travel, and ensured the resolution of day to day issues.

Mr. Murphy’s appointment follows the retirement of Joseph L. Ford, who is retiring from the Bureau after 30 years of distinguished public service. As the FBI’s first ADD, Mr. Ford led the establishment of a new branch to manage FBI personnel, budget, administration, and infrastructure as part of a broad internal realignment to better support our organizational priorities. He served across the country in four FBI Field Offices and at FBI Headquarters, including in 2002, as Inspector in Charge of the Enron Task Force, which also investigated Enron’s auditing firm, Arthur Andersen.

“ Under his leadership as ADD, the FBI successfully established a more mobile connectivity for the FBI workforce via a Bureau-wide Blackberry program, implemented a web-based time and attendance system, deployed the first phase of the next-generation information management system (SENTINEL), enhanced the FBI's strategic planning capabilities with the Strategy Management System, and worked to develop new career paths and plans to upgrade the FBI Academy ,” Mueller said. “I would like to thank Joe for the sacrifices he has made and for his many contributions that have framed the FBI’s transformation and continued progress.”

During his tenure, Mr. Ford managed investigations across a variety of criminal programs including reactive and white-collar crime, public corruption and government program fraud, and health care fraud. Mr. Ford led the FBI's national investigation of Columbia/HCA Healthcare, which resulted in numerous convictions and a record $1.6 billion criminal/civil recovery. For his role in the investigation, he received the Director's Award for Excellence in Investigation and the Attorney General's Award for Exceptional Service.

Director Mueller has also selected Richard L. Haley, II, as Assistant Director of the FBI’s Finance Division and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Haley, formerly the Deputy Assistant Director of the FBI’s Finance Division, has worked with the FBI's budget, procurement, and accounting operations since joining the FBI in 2005. “Rich brings an extensive professional background as a career budget and finance officer.” said Director Mueller. “He will provide a seamless transition to the FBI’s Finance Division and will continue to manage the FBI’s budget, procurement and accounting operations totaling over $6 billion.”

Mr. Haley, having previously served as the Deputy Budget Director and Assistant Director of Budget at the Department of Justice, was responsible for financial oversight of the law enforcement and litigating components. Mr. Haley also worked for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Commerce Department, overseeing its Business Management Fund. He began his government career as a budget examiner at the former Immigration and Naturalization Service and DOJ's Justice Management Division. And before that, he served as an intelligence officer in the U.S. Army. In 2007, Mr. Haley was awarded the Director's Award for Excellence in Management.

Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #47 
The Homeland Security Campus: Repress U

Global Research, January 25, 2008
The Nation

Free-speech zones. Taser guns. Hidden cameras. Data mining. A new security curriculum. Private security contractors. Welcome to the homeland security campus.

From Harvard to UCLA, the ivory tower is fast becoming the latest watchtower in Fortress America. The terror warriors, having turned their attention to "violent radicalization and homegrown terrorism prevention"--as it was recently dubbed in a House of Representatives bill of the same name--have set out to reconquer that traditional hotbed of radicalization, the university.

Building a homeland security campus and bringing the university to heel is a seven-step mission:

1. Target dissidents. As the warfare state has triggered dissent, the campus has attracted increasing scrutiny--with student protesters in the cross hairs. The government's number-one target? Peace and justice organizations.

From 2003 to 2007 an unknown number of them made it into the Pentagon's Threat and Local Observation Notice system (TALON), a secretive domestic spying program ostensibly designed to track direct "potential terrorist threats" to the Defense Department itself. In 2006 the ACLU uncovered, via Freedom of Information Act requests, at least 186 specific TALON reports on "anti-military protests" in the United States--some listed as "credible threats"--from student groups at the University of California, Santa Cruz; State University of New York, Albany; Georgia State University; and New Mexico State University, among other campuses.

At more than a dozen universities and colleges, police officers now double as full-time FBI agents, and according to the Campus Law Enforcement Journal, they serve on many of the nation's 100 Joint Terrorism Task Forces. These dual-purpose officer-agents have knocked on student activists' doors from North Carolina State to the University of Colorado and, in one case, interrogated an Iraqi-born professor at the University of Massachusetts about his antiwar views.

FBI agents, or their campus stand-ins, don't have to do all the work. Administrators often do it for them, setting up "free-speech zones," which actually constrain speech, and punishing those who step outside them. Protests were typically forced into "free-assembly areas" at the University of Central Florida and Clemson University, while students at Hampton and Pace universities faced expulsion for handing out antiwar fliers, aka "unauthorized materials."

2. Lock and load. Many campus police departments are morphing into heavily armed garrisons, equipped with a wide array of weaponry, from Taser stun guns and pepper guns to shotguns and semiautomatic rifles. Lock-and-load policies that began in the 1990s under the rubric of the "war on crime" only escalated with the President's "war on terror." Each school shooting--most recently the massacre at Virginia Tech--adds fuel to the armament flames.

Two-thirds of universities arm their police, according to the Justice Department. Many of the guns being purchased were previously in the province of military units and SWAT teams: for instance, AR-15 rifles (similar to M-16s) are in the arsenals of the University of Texas campus police. Last April City University of New York bought dozens of semiautomatic handguns. Some states, like Nevada, are even considering plans to allow university staff to pack heat in a "special reserve officer corps."

Most of the force used on campuses these days, though, comes in less lethal form, such as the rubber bullets and pepper pellets increasingly used to contain student demonstrations. Then there is the ubiquitous Taser, the electroshock weapon recently ruled a "form of torture" by the United Nations. A Taser was used by UCLA police in November 2006 to deliver shock after shock to an Iranian-American student for failing to produce his ID at the Powell Library. A University of Florida student was Tased last September after asking pointed questions of Senator John Kerry at a public forum, his plea "Don't Tase me, bro!" becoming the stuff of pop folklore.

3. Keep an eye (or hundreds of them) focused on campus. Surveillance has become a boom industry nationally--one that now reaches deep into the heart of campuses. In fact, universities have witnessed explosive growth since 2001 in the electronic surveillance of students, faculty and campus workers. On ever more campuses, closed-circuit security cameras can track people's every move, often from hidden or undisclosed locations, sometimes even into classrooms.

The International Association of Campus Law Enforcement Administrators reports that surveillance cameras have found their way onto at least half of all colleges, their numbers on any given campus doubling, tripling or, in a few cases, rising tenfold since September 11, 2001. Such cameras have proliferated by the hundreds on private campuses, in particular. The University of Pennsylvania, for instance, has more than 400 watching over it, while Harvard and Brown have about 200 each.

Often it can be tricky to find out where the cameras are and just what they're meant to be viewing. The University of Texas battled student journalists over disclosure and ultimately kept its cameras hidden. Sometimes, though, the cameras' purpose seems obvious. Take the case of Hussein Hussein, a professor in the department of animal biotechnology at the University of Nevada, Reno. In January 2005 the widely respected professor found a hidden camera redirected to monitor his office.

4. Mine student records. Student records have in recent years been opened up to all manner of data mining for purposes of investigation, recruitment or just all-purpose tracking. From 2001 to 2006, in an operation code-named Project Strike Back, the Education Department teamed up with the FBI to scour the records of the 14 million students who applied for federal financial aid each year. The objective? "To identify potential people of interest," explained an FBI spokesperson cryptically, especially those linked to "potential terrorist activity."

Strike Back was quietly discontinued in June 2006, days after students at Northwestern University blew its cover. But just one month later, the Education Department's Commission on the Future of Higher Education, in a much-criticized preliminary report, recommended the creation of a federal "unit records" database that would track the activities and studies of college students nationwide. The department's Institute of Education Sciences has developed a prototype for such a national database.

It's not a secret that the Pentagon, for its part, hopes to turn campuses into recruitment centers for its overstretched, overstressed forces. The Defense Department has built its own database for just this purpose. Known as Joint Advertising Market Research and Studies, this program tracks 30 million young people, ages 16 to 25. According to a Pentagon spokesperson, the department has partnered with private marketing and data-mining firms, which in turn sell the government reams of information on students and other potential recruits.

5. Track foreign-born students; keep the undocumented out. Under the auspices of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has been keeping close tabs on foreign students and their dependents through the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS). As of October 2007, ICE reported that it was actively following 713,000 internationals on campuses, while keeping more than 4.7 million names in the database.

The database aims to amass and record information on foreign students throughout their stay inside the United States. SEVIS requires thick files on the students from the sponsoring schools, constantly updated with all academic, biographical and employment records--all of which will be shared with other government agencies. If students fall out of "status" at school--or if the database thinks they have--the Compliance Enforcement Unit of ICE goes into action.

ICE, of course, has done its part to keep the homeland security campus purified of those not born in the homeland. The American Immigration Law Foundation estimates that only one in twenty undocumented immigrants who graduate high school goes on to enroll in a college--many don't go because they cannot afford the tuition but also because they have good reason to be afraid: ICE has deported a number of those who did make it to college, some before they could graduate.

6. Take over the curriculum, the classroom and the laboratory. Needless to say, not every student is considered a homeland security threat. Quite the opposite. Many students and faculty members are seen as potential assets. To exploit these assets, DHS has launched its own curriculum under its Office of University Programs (OUP), intended, it says, to "foster a homeland security culture within the academic community."

The record so far is impressive: DHS has doled out 439 federal fellowships and scholarships since 2003, providing full tuition to students who fit "within the homeland security research enterprise." Two hundred twenty-seven schools now offer degree or certificate programs in "homeland security," a curriculum that encompasses more than 1,800 courses. Along with OUP, some of the key players in creating the homeland security classroom are the US Northern Command and the Aerospace Defense Command, co-founders of the Homeland Security and Defense Education Consortium.

OUP has also partnered with researchers and laboratories to "align scientific results with homeland security priorities." In fiscal year 2008 alone, $4.9 billion in federal funding will go to homeland-security-related research. Grants correspond to sixteen research topics selected by DHS, based on presidential directives, legislation and a smattering of scientific advice.

But wait, there's more: DHS has founded and funded six of its very own "Centers of Excellence," research facilities that span dozens of universities from coast to coast. The latest is a Center of Excellence for the Study of Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism, the funding for which cleared the House in October. The center is mandated to assist a national commission in combating those "adopting or promoting an extremist belief system...to advance political, religious or social change."

7. Privatize, privatize, privatize. Of course, homeland security is not just a department, nor is it simply a new network of surveillance and data mining--it's big business. (According to USA Today, global homeland-security-style spending had already reached $59 billion a year in 2006, a sixfold increase over 2000.) Not surprisingly, then, universities have in recent years established unprecedented private-sector partnerships with the corporations that have the most to gain from their research. DHS's on-campus National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terror (START), for instance, features Lockheed Martin on its advisory board. The Center for Food Protection and Defense relies on an industry working group that includes Wal-Mart and McDonald's offering "guidance and direction," according to its chair.

While vast sums of money are flowing in from corporate sponsors, huge payments are also flowing out to "strategic contracts" with private contractors, as universities permanently outsource security operations to big corporations like Securitas and AlliedBarton. Little of this money actually goes to those guarding the properties, who are often among the most underpaid workers in the universities. Instead, it fills the corporate coffers of those with little accountability for conditions on campus.

Meanwhile, some universities have developed intimate relationships with private-security outfits like the notorious Blackwater. Last May, for example, the University of Illinois and its police training institute cut a deal with the firm to share its facilities and training programs with Blackwater operatives. Local journalists later revealed that the director of the campus program at the time was on the Blackwater payroll. In the age of hired education, such collaboration is apparently par for the course.

Following these seven steps over the past six years, the homeland security state and its constituents have come a long way in their drive to remake the American campus in the image of a compound on lockdown. Somewhere inside the growing homeland security state that is our country, the next seven steps in the process are undoubtedly already being planned.

Still, the rise of Repress U is not inevitable. The new homeland security campus has proven itself unable to shut out public scrutiny or stamp out resistance to its latest Orwellian advances. Sometimes such opposition even yields a free-speech zone dismantled, or the Pentagon's TALON declawed, or a Project Strike Back struck down. A rising tide of student protest, led by groups like the new Students for a Democratic Society, has won free-speech victories and reined in repression from Pace and Hampton, where the university dropped its threat of expulsion, to UCLA, where Tasers will no longer be wielded against passive resisters.

Yet if the tightening grip of the homeland security complex isn't loosened, the latest towers of higher education will be built not of ivory but of Kevlar for the over-armored, over-armed campuses of America.


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #48 

02/08/2008 | 11:41

Obama Barred from FBI Documents about Laxness

US presidential candidate Barack Obama was not granted access to secret FBI documents about Icelandic Nobel laureate Halldór Laxness after his office in the US Senate recently applied for permission on behalf of literary scholar Chay Lemoine.

Lemoine has for three years applied for access to various documents about Laxness in the US, and has been granted access to most, but four FBI documents remain, which allegedly include information that have the potential to jeopardize national security and visa information, which is categorized as private, Fréttabladid reports.

After a few unsuccessful attempts, Lemoine’s decided to request assistance from his senator, Obama, but according to answers from the FBI given to Obama’s office, the FBI’s decision is final and the Laxness documents will remain confidential.

“I think it is remarkable that Obama’s office took the time in the middle of their campaign to react to my letter. I didn’t really expect that they would contact the FBI for me. But Obama’s representative thanked me for my letter about my troubles with the FBI and informed me that, unfortunately, the institution’s decision regarding my case is final,” Lemoine told Fréttabladid.

“Halldór would certainly have enjoyed this, that senators and secret service in this country are so concerned about him after all these years,” Lemoine said, adding that he will try finding other ways to gain access to the documents about Iceland’s most successful author. 

Laxness lived in the US between 1927 and 1929 and tried to make it as a filmmaker in Hollywood. He particularly liked Greta Garbo and wanted her to play Salka Valka (who later became the heroine on one of his most famous novels) in a movie he wrote called A Woman in Pants.

Laxness was optimistic and excited at the beginning of his stay, but after constant delays and rejections he grew tired of show business and the American way of life. He moved back to Iceland and turned to socialism, according to gljufrasteinn.is.


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #49 

Row as ANC moves to disband South African 'FBI'

  •                 guardian.co.uk,                
  • Tuesday February 12 2008
  • Article history ·
  •                                         Report errors or inaccuracies: userhelp@guardian.co.uk                                
  •                                         Letters for publication should be sent to: letters@guardian.co.uk                                
  •                                         If you need help using the site: userhelp@guardian.co.uk                                
  •                                         Call the main Guardian and Observer switchboard:
    +44 (0)20 7278 2332                                
    •                                                         Advertising guide                                                
    •                                                         License/buy our content                                                
This article was first published on guardian.co.uk on Tuesday February 12 2008. It was last updated at 18:35 on February 12 2008.
                Scorpions South Africa drugs FBI ANC crime                                

A Scorpions elite anti-crime officer stands guard over a seized shipment of drugs. Photograph: Kim Ludbrook/EPA


The elite South African anti-crime unit that targeted the new African National Congress leader, Jacob Zuma, in a corruption investigation is to be disbanded.

The party claims the FBI-style force known as the Scorpions employed "Hollywood tactics" against Zuma when raiding several of his and his lawyer's properties in 2005.

Zuma, who deafeated the country's president, Thabo Mbeki, for the ANC leadership, is due to stand trial later this year charged with bribery, fraud, racketeering, money-laundering and tax evasion. It is not clear how the disbandment will affect the trial.

The security minister, Charles Nqakula, announced the decision to parliament today. To cheers from ANC deputies, he said: "The Scorpions will be dissolved and the organised crime unit of the police will be phased out and a new amalgamated unit created."

Nqakula insisted that tackling organised crime remained a key government priority.

"We need proper measures, better human and material resources to achieve our goals in the fight against all crime," he said.

The Scorpions represents the investigation arm of the national prosecuting authority. However, police view the unit as invading its jurisdiction.

At December's ANC conference, which elected Zuma as leader, delegates voted to scrap the unit amid claims it had tried to smear Zuma and deny him the leadership.

The move is interpreted as a sign of renewed infighting between Mbeki and Zuma factions. Mbeki, who established the Scorpions in 1999, is due to hand over power next year, depending on the outcome of Zuma's trial.

Outraged opposition deputies branded the disbandment as an ANC attempt to control over parliament and President Mbeki.

"This announcement once again shows that the country is now run, not by parliament, but by those few in Luthuli House [ANC headquarters]," said Dianne Kohler Barnard, spokeswoman for the Democratic Alliance.

The Scorpions also led the inquiry into South Africa's police chief and head of Interpol, Jackie Selebi, who has been charged with corruption for accepting bribes from a convicted drug trafficker in return for protecting drug shipments, passing on secret reports from the UK and interfering with a murder inquiry.

Although the disbandment must be still be ratified by parliament, given the ANC's domination, the move seems inevitable.


Posts: 8,845
Reply with quote  #50 
3 easy reads about FBI and compassion. See if you detect FBI spin about compassion....

1st read


Ken and Carmen Trentadue

3/1/07 - Alex Jones interviews:
Salt Lake City attorney Jesse Trentadue


New Links 9/21/07:



























21 Aug 1995 Oklahoma City, OK

Kenneth Michael Trentadue is beaten to death in his cell at the Oklahoma City Federal Transfer Center, where he is incarcerated for a minor parole violation. The U.S. Bureau of Prisons tells his family that he hanged himself, but upon inspection at the funeral, they discover injuries over his entire body.

Since August 21, 1995, Salt Lake City trial lawyer Jesse Trentadue has led a small, relentless crusade against Janet Reno, the FBI and the United States Department of Justice.

The quest is a family affair, and includes Trentadue's aging mother who has handed out T-shirts on the steps of "Main Justice" in Washington, D.C. For four years now, the family has doggedly searched for the truth about how family member Kenneth Trentadue died while in federal custody. And now smoke blowing in from the direction of Waco, Texas, where dozens of people met their death in a standoff with Reno and the FBI, may spell more trouble for embattled Attorney General Reno and her FBI director, Louis Freeh.

For the Trentadue family, their personal nightmare began in the early morning hours of August 21, 1995, shortly after prison guards claimed to have found the body of Kenneth Michael Trentadue hanging in a suicide proof cell in the new "Federal Transportation Center" in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Kenneth Trentadue had been returned to federal custody there for a "parole violation" hearing. According to family members who had contact with him hours before he died, he was positive and upbeat about his chances for an early return home.

Originally locked up for a bungled bank robbery, Trentadue was a model prisoner while in custody. A slip-up had resulted in his return to jail, but family members say he had made important changes in his life and had prospects for a good future.

"He left a wife and new baby behind," says older brother Jesse. The family describes Kenneth as a peaceful person, unless you pushed him into a corner. "He was not the kind of man to back down from a fight," says older brother Jesse.

A recent twist in the Trentadue case coupled with newly discovered evidence in the Branch Davidian cases, may well set the stage for explosive confrontations in both the halls of Congress and federal courtrooms in October of this year. While Congress prepares to peel back layers of FBI secrets, families of the dead victims will be in federal court seeking once and for all to learn what the Justice Department and the FBI are doing in secret behind their closed doors.

In the Trentadue case, older brother Jesse Trentadue says that from the very beginning, Justice Department lawyers have lied about the existence of critical evidence, including death scene pictures. Federal officials finally admitted that photos existed only after a number of them were leaked to a writer for GQ Magazine, Mary Fischer.

Though they admitted photos existed, Justice then they claimed they couldn't find the negatives of the 35-millimeter snapshots taken of Cell 709A where several prison guards have testified Trentadue's body was found hanging at 3 AM on August 21, 1995.

Early-on, a literal "swearing contest" erupted between the prison guard who took the pictures, and the FBI Special Agent he swore under oath he gave them to. The agent testified that he never received them. After several years, the negatives mysteriously reappeared in the Oklahoma City's FBI field office where another Special Agent, Tommy Linn, says he found them in a stack of pictures of the Oklahoma City's paramilitary FBI "SWAT" team.

The prison guard, Kenneth Freeman, has testified he used two different cameras to film the cell at different times that morning.

In a deposition, Freeman said he took one set early in the morning of August 21, 1995, before sunrise. Later that morning he went back with his assistant Serena Israel and took more pictures. In his testimony Freeman admitted "rearranging" several items of evidence: a plastic knife and two plastic toothpaste tubes. Freeman said he posed the evidence to better photograph the items.

The government now claims Trentadue used the plastic items to inflict deep gashes in the right side of his neck before he supposedly fabricated a noose from bed sheets and hanged himself in a cell which the architect who designed it says is "suicide proof."

Earlier this year, Trentadue lawyers filed papers with the federal court in Oklahoma City refuting the conclusions of experts hired by the Justice Department to help defend it in the civil suit. Former Oklahoma City police captain, and self-styled "blood spatter expert" Tom Bevel maintains that Trentadue viciously beat himself to a bloody pulp and then hung himself. Other experts, including Rudy Riet, and a Chicago homicide investigator disagree.

The House Judiciary Committee had previously assigned a veteran homicide investigator, on loan from the Chicago Police Department, to investigate the Trentadue case. The detective, in a telephone interview, said that Trentadue "was clearly murdered." The investigation was derailed by the Clinton-Lewinsky matter and never taken back up by the House committee.

It is a complex case to investigate. The alleged death scene, Cell 709A, was completely "sanitized" shortly after 7 AM on August 21, 1995, after Oklahoma State Medical Examiner staff were denied access to it. A "crime scene" investigation was never accomplished on the cell and all sides to the controversy agree that critical evidence was lost because of that. Since the scene was never properly documented and vital evidence lost or destroyed, the government and the Trentadue family have been at war over what the remaining evidence actually proves.

And since the government is in control of virtually all the physical evidence in the case, the Trentadue family has had to fight lengthy battles to gain even limited access to the evidence. And when they do get access, inevitably it causes problems for the U.S. government.

A person close to the Trentadue case said that one such problem the government will soon face is in the nature of explaining how the strips of sheet that supposedly formed a noose were "cut" into strips with either scissors or a knife. Bureau of Prisons records indicate that Trentadue was held in the most secure part of the facility. He was supposedly alone in a cell where there were no sharp objects, certainly no scissors or knives.

A motion filed by the family revealed that forensic analysis of the sheet strips, a number of which are still missing, precludes their having been ripped by hand and confirms that they were cut.

If sheets are a problem, the photos are a nightmare for the government. In May, 1999, the government finally produced a set of twenty-nine glossy enlargements of what they claim is the only roll of film ever shot at the scene. The Justice Department stands on that claim despite the fact that government lawyers had previously produced two separate "photo logs," and even the photographer, Freeman, says otherwise.

"When we began to analyze the photos," said Trentadue, "we thought they had been faked." Beside the 35-millimeter photos, the government also produced a series of eight Polaroid pictures.

An experienced trial lawyer, Trentadue says he was immediately suspicious when he was told the negatives could not be examined by Trentadue family lawyers and their experts. Agents and lawyers from the Justice Department's Office of Inspector showed Trentadue and his attorneys strips of negatives they claimed constituted "a roll." When they handed over the prints, they also produced several volumes of CD ROM's which supposedly contain digitized copies of the negatives. The attorneys for Trentadue werre never allowed to touch the negatives or closely examine them.

Despite that, a photographic expert presently employed by the U.S. Navy as an image analyst, says the attempt by the FBI to fake the pictures is "an amateurish result produced by professionals."

The pictures are a gory collection that begins with a sheet of paper with a handwritten date on it. What follows are pictures of Kenneth Trentadue's body, covered with blood. His knuckles are bruised. Huge patches of scalp are bloodied. Government officials claim it's the result of him beating himself. His neck bears a long gash on the right side. After the gruesome pictures shot in the prison hospital, the scene switches to the cell where it is claimed he first beat then hung himself. The cell has puddles of blood on the floor. A bloody noose is tied at an impossible height off the floor to a grate that has not a single drop of blood on it.

The analyst, speaking on condition of anonymity, examined the original prints at the request of Arkansas Chronicle on his off-hours. After nearly two months of comparing the prints, the digitized CD-ROMs, the testimony of the witnesses and the actual photo logs, the expert eventually unraveled and explained the faked photos.

He said his first resource was the Navy's own Naval Observatory. The observatory keeps incredibly accurate records of sunrise times for every place on earth. That includes Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, on the morning of August 21, 1995.

According to the National Weather Service, the weather was clear with a thin haze in the air at sunrise, August 21, 1995. But, if the government's negatives are to be believed, the sun rose and set at least twice that morning at the Oklahoma City airport. If it did, nobody seemed to notice it.

"The sequence of exposure of the pictures is tracked by 'frame numbers' that appear on the edge of the film. Even after the negatives are cut into strips and placed in plastic sleeves, you can always tell which order they were shot in by looking at the frame number just beneath the actual image," said the Navy analyst. "Those frame numbers are put on the film by the manufacturer, not the camera."

It is this "image sequence" that creates the most problems for the Justice Department. When you take the pictures, in the sequence that the government claims they are on the roll and compare it to the testimony, and, to other pictures on the same roll, the Alice-in-Wonderland world of the government defense to a murder case becomes shockingly apparent.

According to the negatives, the sun had risen an hour early, just in time for prison guard Freeman to take his first picture of the cell. His camera, a Minolta with a built-in flash, failed to flash on the first shot in the cell. And through the vertical slit window at the back of the cell, you can see daylight, trees and grass. "Another picture after that one shows a clearly illuminated outdoor scene," said the expert. "Somehow, the sun set again. Additional pictures, but with higher frame numbers, show total darkness outside the very same window. There's just no way the sun was going up and down. It's the pictures that are all wrong."

Pressed for an explanation as to how such images could be faked, the image expert explained. He described the process whereby a computer with two "peripherals," a negative scanner and a film output printer were used to fabricate a roll of film that appears to be "original," but really isn't.

"What someone obviously has done is this: they had the two rolls of film all along. And I would guess that there is surely something on one or both of those rolls they don't want anyone to see. So, they simply used a common computer tool, a 'negative scanner,' to import the negative images into a graphics program.

"Once they have scanned in the images they can electronically reassemble them into any sequence they want to. The original sequence of pictures can be shuffled just like a deck of cards. Picture number one can become number eight, and so on. The images can also be electronically altered, special effects filters used, and information added or subtracted.

"Once the original negative is scanned in, the sky's the limit with a skilled operator, and there are a bunch out there. But whoever did this job got into trouble when the 'reassembled' the faked roll and forgot to take into consideration the incredible documentation that exists on paper about who took which pictures and when they took them. That's why they have some of the pictures out of sequence with daylight where darkness should be, and vice-versa.

"After they had the fake roll assembled they merely issued a command to 'print' the images to a new roll of film. There are printers that you can hook to your computer, even at home, and create a whole new roll of film. The printer created a 'perfect' roll of film that was conventionally processed using what is known as a 'C-41' process. The negatives were then cut into strips and placed into the plastic sleeves just like the originals," explained the imagery expert. "You could take the bogus roll to the local Moto-Foto and have them developed and printed, and nobody would be the wiser," he added.

Government lawyers also produced the faked negatives for copying onto CD-ROM's. The analyst said that there are tell-tale "artifacts" on the digital imagery that further confirms the negatives are "second generation," but would not offer specific details on the methodology used to identify the fake photos. Arkansas Chronicle was able to obtain a set of the CD-ROMs and have them analyzed at the same time as the prints were analyzed.

The analyst said that the most damning piece of evidence is that one of the pictures released earlier by government lawyers somehow does not appear on the "roll" that the FBI produced. "It's sort of an obscure shot. But the point is, the picture is not on the roll of their negatives, and without question, it was indeed shot between two frames that I can absolutely identify on the roll they released." Other evidence suggests, he said, that the roll they produced was in fact shot from two different cameras with "two different lens systems."

"There is strong evidence to support a claim that several of the pictures were altered, and, in once case, some photos were electronically cropped to make it appear that one photo was in fact two different photos. The cycle time of a Minolta camera, such as the one they used is too slow to create to images that are otherwise so completely similar in intricate detail," said the analyst. "My opinion is that they had a quota to fill . . . somebody said, 'here, fill up this roll with pictures and don't use any of these shots to do it.' So they left some pictures out, got many of the real pictures out of sequence, and then doubled up on some of the pictures which were safe to use in order to try to make up a full roll. The big problem is that the sequences are all wrong and they don't coincide with the photo logs and they don't have any relation to the light conditions outside the window of the prison cell."

One polaroid picture, supposedly shot at 4:30 a.m., has a picture of part of a watch band on the hand of a man who has testified under oath that he didn't come to work until at least 6:30 a.m. that date.

"I suppose that's why they have refused to let us have them tested by an independent lab," said Trentadue.

"Since the case record would indicate that the FBI had custody of these negatives for several years," said the imagery expert, "that's where I would be looking in terms of identifying who manipulated this imagery. It took really expensive equipment to produce these fakes and not a lot of people have it."

Contacted again shortly before press time, the expert would neither confirm nor deny that he is one of two imagery experts now examining video tape of aerial FBI infrared photography from Waco for a U.S. Congressional committee headed by Rep. Dan Burton.

According to court records in the Trentadue case, the Department of Justice's Office of Inspector General has indeed been investigating Bureau of Prisons and Federal Bureau of Investigation agents for complicity in criminal misconduct in the Trentadue case.

It was in the process of having the pictures and CD-ROM's examined that a chilling allegation surfaced about the capabilities of the FBI's lab, especially its ability to alter physical evidence such as photographs, video and audio tape.

























May 2, 2001


U.S. District Judge Tim Leonard ruled today that the family of Kenneth Michael Trentadue suffered severe emotional distress because of the insensitive action of federal prison officials and ordered $1.1 million paid in settlement of the law suit brought by them against the Federal Bureau of Prisons in 1997.

Federal and state investigators called the Aug. 21, 1995, death of Trentadue, 44, a suicide, but his family alleged prison guards or another inmate had killed him.

Although state Medical Examiner Fred Jordan initially ruled Ken Trentadue's cause of death as unknown, the injuries covering Ken’s body caused his family and others to suspect he had been beaten to death. Federal and state investigations subsequently determined the injuries were caused by a botched attempt to hang himself before succeeding on the second try. The cause of death was then amended to suicide.

In December, a federal jury found that Lt. Stuart A. Lee, a former officer at the Federal Transfer Center, was deliberately indifferent to Ken’s medical needs because when Ken was found hanging in his cell, Lee did not order guards to cut him down and attempt to revive him. Lee had said it was obvious Trentadue was already dead.

The jury awarded $20,000 in compensatory damages to the family in compensation for Lee’s deliberate indifference to Ken’s medical needs. Jurors decided only the case against Lee, the officer in charge the night Ken was found hanging.

The broader allegations against the federal government were be decided by the judge. Judge Leonard ruled Monday that the federal government was liable for the intentional infliction of emotional distress caused to Ken's wife and family.

Judge Leonard scolded prison officials for not informing the family of Ken's injuries or the fact that an autopsy had been performed. Ken’s family was shocked and outraged when they discovered the injuries after his body was shipped to them in California.

"Prison officials did not initially answer the Trentadue family's valid and understandable questions about the unexpected death of their loved one," the judge said. "Their silence and the mishandling of potential evidence from Trentadue's cell helped fuel conspiracy theories that the inmate was murdered."

Leonard did find however that Ken committed suicide, stating that allegations of a conspiracy by prison officials to cover up a murder was just speculation and that actions of prison officials were more consistent with ignorant or incompetent, rather than conspiratorial behavior.

Come on Judge Leonard – do these photos look like suicide to you? Do they look like suicide to ANYONE?

Oklahoma City attorney Scott Adams, who represented the Trentadue family, said he was very pleased the judge punished the prison officials for their actions.

"They stonewalled us from day one," Adams said. "They treated the family very horribly. You cannot treat people the way the government treated the Trentadue family." Adams said the judge was sending a message with his award of $1.1 million. http://www.geocities.com/prisonmurder/ken_trentadue.html

2nd read
FBI to honor Interfaith Service Bureau director
By Bill Lindelof - blindelof@sacbee.com

 Tuesday, February 26, 2008

The Sacramento office of the FBI has announced that a longtime influential religious leader has been selected as the recipient of the 2007 FBI Director's Community Leadership award.

The FBI has chosen to honor the Rev. Dexter McNamara, director of the Interfaith Service Bureau for 13 years, with the award. The FBI said that ISB has helped people of religious backgrounds discover the common call of faith to work for justice, mercy and compassion.

The ISB has brought faith groups together to foster understanding and trust and worked to help the poor.

The award, to be presented Wednesday, is presented annually to recognize the achievements of people and organizations in the area of drug and violence education and prevention.

"It give me great hope when I see people from many different religious and ethnic-cultural backgrounds ... working together to create a safe, just, healthy and compassionate community," McNamara said.

3rd read
Previous Topic | Next Topic

Easily create a Forum Website with Website Toolbox.

? ?
Copyright ? 2001-2004 Who?s A Rat. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.