Who's A Rat - Largest Online Database of Informants and Agents
HomeMembers LoginLatest NewsRefer A LawyerMessage BoardOnline StoreAffiliatesAbout UsContact Us
Who's A Rat - Largest Online Database of Informants and Agents Worldwide!
Site Navigation
Visit Our Store
Refer A Lawyer
Link To Us
Latest News
Top Secret Documents
Make A Donation
Important Case Law
Members Login
Message Board
Legal Information
Advertise your AD, Book or Movie

Informants and Agents?Who's a Rat Message Board

Sign up Calendar

  Author   Comment  

Posts: 535
Reply with quote  #1 
I would love to hear some comments on this story, This is not an isolated event, the general public is just ignorant to what really goes on between prosecutors and Snitches, I hope this website and the other sites that will follow educate the public as to what is really going on behind the scenes in our Courts and with our Law Enforcement.
Tales of a jailhouse snitch

Clarence Zacke's testimony may have cost one man his life, the other his youth


"Scary," "dangerous," and "killer" are some of the words people have used to describe Clarence Zacke -- one of Brevard County's most notorious criminals -- who will go free in a few months.

But some say it's the words Zacke himself has used that should keep him from tasting his freedom again.

Clarence Zacke

Zacke's disputed testimony helped keep an innocent man behind bars for 22 years. Another man was executed, thanks, at least in part, to Zacke's statements against him.

Zacke was convicted four times of conspiring to kill witnesses against him. He pleaded guilty to killing the brother of an assistant state attorney. He has been accused of lying on the witness stand in attempts to have his sentence reduced.

But, thanks to deals he cut in exchange for his testimony against others, the man prosecutors once described as "disrespectful" and "dangerous" is months away from being released. Some say questions about that testimony should keep him from going free. Others go further. They say his statements under oath are so dubious, they're calling for an investigation of the prosecutors he dealt with.

A few months after state attorneys called for the courts to put Zacke away for 180 years, he became Brevard prosecutor's star witness in trials against Gerald Stano and Wilton Dedge -- two cases in which the state had poor luck in first trials.

Stano's first trial for the murder of a Brevard County woman ended in a mistrial. Dedge's 1982 conviction for the rape of a Brevard County teenager was overturned by an appeals court.

Then, a curious thing happened: Stano and Dedge spent just enough time with Zacke for him to testify against them -- saying they had confessed their crimes. Second trials for both ended in convictions.

Dedge spent 22 years behind bars, unwaveringly proclaiming his innocence. He was freed in August, after DNA evidence cleared him. Stano, who some say was mentally ill and confessed to things he did not do, was not as lucky. He was executed in March 1998.

Hand-picked witness

Dedge's attorneys say Zacke was hand-picked by prosecutors in the case, coached on what to say and then lied to convict Dedge.

"We're going to prove in court the conspiracy that put him there," Cheney Mason, one of Dedge's attorneys said recently, adding that he was preparing to sue those who put Dedge in prison.

Zacke's contact in the state attorney's office in both the Dedge and Stano cases was John Dean Moxley, now a judge. Moxley declined to be interviewed for this story.

Nina Morrison, another Dedge attorney with the New York–based Innocence Project, said there are not too many places where Zacke could have received such detailed information regarding her client's case.

"When you look at the wealth and type of detail he had, there are only three places that he could have received that information from: Wilton, Wilton's attorneys or from prosecutors," she said. "We know it didn't come from Wilton or his lawyers. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to connect the dots."

Dedge himself had little to say about Zacke after his release except that he was totally blindsided by the convicted felon's testimony.

"I couldn't believe it," Dedge said. "I lost a lot of faith in people. He got up there and lied and he knew things that I didn't know."

Zacke refused to be interviewed by FLORIDA TODAY without compensation. He wanted free newspaper subscriptions and copies of photographs taken by the paper. FLORIDA TODAY does not pay for its interviews and turned him down.

"Too bad. No deal!" Zacke responded in a letter to the newspaper. "Your (sic) on your own. Ya'll missed out on learning a new fact that never came up at trial. One that only Dedge and I know about that took place in that van."

Ordering the hits

Clarence Zacke was once a successful West Melbourne junk dealer.

But in May of 1980, he ran into trouble. Police arrested him for smuggling marijuana from Jamaica. Zacke panicked. Instead of taking his chances in court, he decided to have witnesses against him eliminated.

He was found guilty of trying to hire a man to kill Kenneth Merithew, a police informant who helped foil Zacke's drug smuggling operation. But the hired assassin, Richard Lee Hunt, lied to Zacke. He told him he had killed Merithew and his two twin boys. In truth, they had been placed under police protection.

"Business is business," Zacke chillingly replied, according to wiretaps of the conversation.

Then, weeks before he was to testify against Zacke, Hunt vanished. Years later, Zacke accepted a second-degree murder plea for Hunt's death. It was there that Zacke learned he could get his sentence reduced by testifying against others.

Zacke also was found guilty of ordering a hit on Brevard's chief prosecutor at the time, Douglas Chesire. In all, four juries found Zacke guilty of conspiring to commit murder. He was sentenced to 180 years. His sentence was reduced to 60 years in exchange for fingering the two hit men involved in the Hunt murder.

Ironically, the drug charges against Zacke were dropped because of a technicality. He would have gone free.

Zacke testifies

Geraldo Stano, who already had been convicted of eight murders elsewhere in the state, went on trial in 1982 for the Brevard County murder of Cathy Lee Scharf. But the case ended in a mistrial when Stano's confession did not match details of the case.

Some familiar with the case say Stano was a serial confessor whose mental capacity should have been questioned.

"It's my understanding that Stano was mildly retarded," said Sandy D'Alemberte, a former state legislator who is working to secure compensation for Dedge.

Still, a judge ordered a retrial in the Scharf case.

Enter Zacke, who claims he struck up a friendship with Stano while behind bars.

During the retrial in 1983, Zacke testified that Stano confessed the murder to him in the prison courtyard. This time, the details matched the murder and Stano was convicted.

Later, though, Zacke may have recanted his testimony in an interview with a freelance journalist. The interview became a critical part of a bid for a new trial in the Stano case.

The freelancer, Nash Rosenblatt, gave Stano's attorney tapes of the conversation. According to court documents, they showed that "Zacke told him in a telephone interview that Stano never really confessed to killing Scharf. Zacke also stated in the interview that Stano's prosecutors offered him certain rewards in exchange for his testimony against Stano. . . . prosecutors then coached Zacke on what he should say."

In its decision denying the new trial, the Supreme Court of Florida said it didn't consider the argument because Zacke was not under oath when he spoke to Rosenblatt.

Transcripts of the interview, obtained by FLORIDA TODAY, quote Zacke saying he was "programmed" by the State Attorney on what to say.

"What was the State Attorney's name?" Rosenblatt asked.

"Chris White and Dean Moxley," Zacke replied.

Spoon-fed informant?

After Zacke testified against Stano, then-Assistant State Attorney Moxley wrote a letter to the Department of Corrections asking that Zacke be put somewhere safe. He would be needed again.

"Given the fact that Zacke has testified against Gerald Stano and will testify against others, I'd appreciate any assignment decision which will protect him," Moxley wrote.

Zacke was back in Brevard the following year to testify against Wilton Dedge.

Citing problems with dog scent evidence used to convict Dedge in 1982, an appeals court ordered a new trial in 1984. Prosecutors Chris White and Moxley needed more evidence to go with a pair of blonde pubic hairs and shaky eyewitness testimony.

Enter Zacke, again. He wound up on a transport van with Wilton Dedge.

Zacke testified that Dedge talked to him and confessed, saying he "had cut some old hog." He also said that Dedge told him he would kill the rape victim if he ever got released.

Critics, though, insist Zacke must have been spoon-fed information about Dedge and Stano -- especially since DNA evidence irrefutably cleared Dedge later.

Prosecutors deny wrongdoing.

State Attorney Norman Wolfinger, though, said there never has been any evidence supporting wrongdoing in the cases. Dedge, he said, would have been convicted even without Zacke's testimony.

"Zacke knew how to use the system," Wolfinger said. "It makes sense to me that perhaps Dedge spoke to Zacke after the first trial and then Zacke exaggerated the story."

Prosecutor Chris White said "Zacke was promised nothing for Dedge."

White's theory: "Zacke is a big man in the DOC and has some certain folklore to him in Brevard County. Maybe Dedge wanted to look like a big man in front of Zacke. Who knows? Sometimes people will admit to a crime to look tougher."

Dedge attorney Nina Morrison insists that an investigation is needed.

"This is the criminal justice system's equivalent of a major disaster," she said. "We have been calling for one but so far there has been no response."

Contact Torres at 242-3649 or jtorres@flatoday.net


Posts: 535
Reply with quote  #2 

Wrongful conviction probed

Special prosecutor to investigate officials who sent innocent man to jail for rape.



What's next?

• After investigating the conduct of two law enforcement officialsa special prosecutor will decide whether to press charges. • A federal judge will decide whether a lawsuit filed on behalf of Ken can proceed.

Comment on this story
Send this story to a friend
Get Home Delivery

A special prosecutor has been appointed to investigate two Macomb County law enforcement officials who sent an innocent man to jail for rape.

St. Clair County Prosecutor Peter Georgeis investigating Chief 41st District Court Judge Linda Davis, who was then the assistant prosecutor in the rape case, and Clinton Township Lt. Thomas Ostin, the detective who led the investigation, according to state officials.

The man who was convicted, Ken Wyniemko, eventually was cleared by DNA evidence, but not before he spent nearly nine years behind bars.

Kim Eddie, assistant executive director of the state's Prosecuting Attorney's Coordinating Council, assigned George to the case after the Macomb County Prosecutor's Office referred it to the Michigan Attorney General because of potential conflicts of interest. "Peter will be looking into allegations concerning Lt. Ostin and Judge Davis that were raised by the defendant," Eddie said. "He stands in the shoes as the Macomb County Prosecutor in this matter. Charges are totally his discretion."

George, assigned to the case last week, could not be reached for comment Wednesday.

Wyniemko's attorney asked the Macomb County Prosecutor's Office to review Wyniemko's pending federal lawsuit, which lays out evidence that suggests witnesses were coached, evidence was buried, conflicting leads were ignored and justice was forsaken for a conviction. Wyniemko is suing Clinton Township, its police chief and investigating officers, including Ostin, in U.S. District Court in Detroit, claiming his civil rights were violated.

The lawsuit, which doesn't name Davis as a defendant, says she and Ostin turned to a jailhouse informant the day before Wyniemko's preliminary hearing because they were desperate to make sure the rape charge would hold up in court.

The informant, Glen McCormick, issued a statement saying Wyniemko confessed.

He reiterated that on the witness stand at Wyniemko's preliminary hearing and later at the trial.

In exchange, McCormick, a repeat criminal offender facing life in prison, received a lighter sentence.

A jury convicted Wyniemko of rape and robbery and he was sentenced to 40 to 60 years in prison. He was released in June 2003.

McCormick now says he lied.

Wyniemko, formerly of Clinton Township, has little money and lives with friends in Auburn Hills. He still hasn't found a full-time job.

"Believe it or not, people are still leery," said the 53-year-old, who attaches a letter to his resume explaining the nine-year gap. "They say, 'How do we know you didn't do it? You were in prison.' It's frustrating, but you have to keep trying."

In a Nov. 1 motion filed as part of Wyniemko's year-old lawsuit, McCormick says in a sworn statement that he lied because he was afraid of doing life in prison.

McCormick also said Davis and Ostin told him what to say, after they left him alone in a room with a copy of the police report that he read. He then used those details in his testimony, he said in a statement.

"By reading the police report, I learned details about the crime ... I later used these details in the testimony I gave," McCormick says in his statement.

McCormick, who shared a Macomb County cell with Wyniemko for about two weeks, was facing life, until he was offered what Davis would later call, "The deal of the century."

"I was concerned about the possibility of a life sentence ... I agreed to be a witness even though Mr. Wyniemko had not told me in any way that he had committed any crime," McCormick says in his statement, adding that he regrets what he did.

Throughout much of the 1994 rape investigation, Wyniemko's credibility with investigators was unraveling, but no more so than the day before his preliminary hearing.

That day, Aug. 10, 1994, Ostin, Davis and Detective Bart Marlatt met with McCormick, after Davis contacted him to see if he would talk.

"Did they believe McCormick, or were they just trying to bolster their case?" said Peter Henning, a Wayne State University law professor and former federal prosecutor. "Did they cross the line and suborn perjury and obstruct justice? That's what the special prosecutor is going to focus on."

Davis declined to comment. Ostin declined to comment through his Troy attorney, Roger A. Smith. Smith said McCormick's sworn declaration "absolutely lacks credibility."

"You have to remember that the declarant in this case is a convicted felon with no credibility at all," Smith said. "This is an indictment of the system, not the actions of the individuals involved."

Wyniemko's lawsuit suggests otherwise, as does at least one other record.

McCormick's circuit court case file, which isn't part of the lawsuit, indicates Davis broke office protocol when she took the case from another assistant prosecutor without written approval from a supervisor, Macomb County Prosecutor Carl Marlinga said Tuesday.

McCormick was charged with unarmed robbery and resisting and obstructing an officer. Since he had three felony convictions on his record, he was facing a potential life sentence.

Fifteen days after McCormick gave his statement, he pleaded guilty to a reduced charge.

Davis, who wasn't initially involved in the case, was now leading it, according to McCormick's case file. She recommended a 1-year jail sentence, which is what McCormick received in Jan. 1995. Davis' signature is on the sentencing order.

Marlinga said it's not unusual for an assistant prosecutor to take over a case if they're working on a deal in another case with the suspect. However, Marlinga said, that normally requires written approval from a supervisor. McCormick's case file reflects no such approval.

"The significant drop in jail time for McCormick was always a concern of mine," Marlinga said. "Linda herself called it, 'The deal of the century.'"

McCormick is in a state prison in the Upper Peninsula doing time for auto theft and could not be reached for comment.

Wyniemko is the 132nd person of 153 freed nationwide with DNA evidence and the second in Michigan, according to the Innocence Project.

You can reach Tony Manolatos at (313) 222-2069 or tmanolatos@detnews.com. Source: Detroit News research Source: Detroit News research


Posts: 2
Reply with quote  #3 
This is exactly what I was talking about in my reply to maynard's post about the motives of this site!

There is a man named Phillip Sharp that has committed numerous crimes like this snitch. His list of crimes range from running over a man in a car(not killing crippling) beating a woman and her boyfriend into ICU hospital unit, driving drunk at over a 100 mph the wrong way down a one way street, at least 2 known stabbings, god knows how many rapes and finally the execution style murder of a young man that has supposedly finally landed him on death row in Georgia.
I used to run with this guy as a kid and watched him evolve into a murderous villain, all thanks to immunity for snitching on drug dealers(gotta keep it looking good for that war on drugs). He should have been stopped 2 decades ago!!! Instead he was allowed to blossom being nurtured by LE with the keys to the city (and moved all over the state).
He is a very good tattoo artist and knows how to get into crowds with some false charm,artistry and used to be looks. He was created by the paid CI system.
Previous Topic | Next Topic

Easily create a Forum Website with Website Toolbox.

? ?
Copyright ? 2001-2004 Who?s A Rat. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.