Who's A Rat - Largest Online Database of Informants and Agents
HomeMembers LoginLatest NewsRefer A LawyerMessage BoardOnline StoreAffiliatesAbout UsContact Us
Who's A Rat - Largest Online Database of Informants and Agents Worldwide!
Site Navigation
Visit Our Store
Refer A Lawyer
Affiliates
Link To Us
Latest News
Top Secret Documents
Make A Donation
Important Case Law
Members Login
Feedback
Message Board
Legal Information
Advertise your AD, Book or Movie

Informants and Agents?Who's a Rat Message Board

WhosaRat.com

Register  |   |   | Chat
 
 
 


Note: This topic is locked. No new replies will be accepted.


Reply
 
Author Comment
 
joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #51 

U.S. | Police State and Prisons

Florida Police Tells World: Trust Us, Not Your Lying Eyes
by junya
Monday Oct 29th, 2007 5:05 AM
Videos of police treatment of University of Florida student Andrew Meyer after he questioned Senator John Kerry at a campus forum ignited international outrage at the open display of the type of democracy that the US is exporting at the point of a gun. The University of Florida police responded immediately, requesting an "independent" review by the Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement (FDLE) . It came as no surprise that FDLE supported the police mauling. But the executive summary of the report does offer a rare glimpse at a police investigation of police - normally "internal affairs" (tain't nobody's business but our own). This is what a police state looks like.

Videos of police treatment of University of Florida student Andrew Meyer after he questioned Senator John Kerry at a campus forum ignited international outrage at the open display of the type of democracy that the US is exporting at the point of a gun.

The University of Florida police responded immediately, requesting an "independent" review by the Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement (FDLE) . It came as no surprise that FDLE supported the police mauling. But the executive summary of the report does offer a rare glimpse at a police investigation of police - normally "internal affairs" (tain't nobody's business but our own). This is what a police state looks like.

Seeing through the police snow job

Although it is a myth that so-called Eskimos have an excessive number of words for snow, it is no myth that the modern bureaucratic police state we live in has a profusion of different agencies empowered to relieve you of the burden of life and liberty. Police agencies benefit from the resulting confusion in public perception, when the call for "independent inquiry" goes out. We must ask, "Who is FDLE, and are they independent?". The FDLE website tells us:

The Florida Department of Law Enforcement provides investigative, forensic, and protective services to local, state, and federal agencies...FDLE conducts independent investigations and coordinates multi-jurisdictional and special criminal investigations with local, state, and federal authorities...

So it's the state version of the FBI (the California equivalent is the California Bureau of Investigation: CBI). Florida's G-men are tasked with another duty:

FDLE also investigates fraud and abuse in Florida's public assistance programs. Primarily, these investigations are in the cash assistance, food stamp, Medicaid, school readiness and subsidized child day care programs. Investigations are conducted on program recipients...

So in Florida, when the inept brutality of local police is revealed to the world, they call on the state's food stamp police for "independent" investigation to clear them.

Flushing out the facts

The report summary (http://www.president.ufl.edu/incident/FDLE-Executive-Summary.pdf) tells us that the FDLE mission was to review: "The University of Florida Police Officer's establishment of a criminal violation which would constitute a physical arrest." In other words, did the police establish "probable cause" before arresting Andrew Meyer for violating the Florida statute that declares:

it is unlawful for any person to knowingly disrupt or interfere with the lawful administration or functions of any educational institution...To conspire to riot or to engage in any...disruption or disturbance which interferes with...activity on school board property.

The summary also reported that FDLE was also tasked to review the use of force by University police in making the arrest. The summary provides the relevant law:

A law enforcement officer, or any person whom the officer has summoned or directed to assist him or her, is not justified in the use of force if the arrest is unlawful and known by him or her to be unlawful.

FDLE had a tough job: the world watched the many videos and saw that the event was not disrupted by Meyer. When a speaker at a forum is trying to address a questioner and the questioner's mike is shut off, it might be argued that the forum organizers disrupted the event. When the police stop the discussion to drag the questioner away, one wonders why the police were not arrested for disruption. But the video clearly shows that Meyer's questioning did not disrupt: Kerry asked (sheepishly) to be allowed to answer Meyer's question. We witnessed that Kerry even continues (bizarrely) with a response to the question while six police sat on Meyer and Tasered him. So the facts showed that the arrest was unlawful, and thus the use of force to knowingly make an unlawful arrest was also unlawful. FDLE was forced to free the world from these disturbing facts, bringing the situation under control with police state propaganda.

Q. Did University Police act lawfully?
A. Stop asking questions, or you'll get Tased!

(Note: the report summary sloppily blacks out Meyer's name - as shown in the sample above - so it is quoted here as [Meyer])

FDLE dived right in with a passion: not investigating the arrest, nor the use of force, but building the criminal case against Andrew Meyer. The "investigative narrative" begins:

During the course of FDLE's investigation, Agents learned that approximately one week prior to this incident [Meyer] had made comments and acted out in a public place on campus. This incident...was documented as investigators believed it potentially provides the State Attorney a background or reference into [Meyer's] mind-set or his pre-disposition [sic] to act out in a specific manner at the John Kerry Speech.

Then we see a standard police tactic: spin lawful actions into criminal behavior . The report summary repeatedly uses the terms" interruption" and "disruption" as if they are the same thing. The law forbids "disruption": causing a disturbance or problem. The law does not forbid "interruption" : breaking a speaker's flow. An interruption is not a disruption when the speaker yields, as Kerry did. Yet, in a section titled "[Meyer's] initial interruption", we read: "[Meyer] disrupts Senator Kerry who is speaking with another audience member", even though a few sentences later the summary implicitly acknowledges that the interruption did not rise to a disturbance: "Senator Kerry jokingly replies...Senator Kerry tells [Meyer] to wait and the police officers let [Meyer] wait at the microphone". Nonetheless, the following section is titled "[Meyer's] second time at the microphone and second disruption" - even though the section never states what the disruption was, and the body of the section never uses either the term "disruption" or "interruption"!

In the effort to refute our lying eyes, the report summary unwittingly confirms what the videos only implied. Although on the videos it appears that police did not speak with Meyer before laying hands on him, it seemed possible that their words were not picked up. But the report summary makes it clear that the world witnessed what Taser opponents have long observed: that Tasers are used not as an alternative to guns, but as an alternative to speaking:

Officer Wise and Mallo stated they were told by one of the Accent Staff Members [forum organizers] that it was time for [Meyer] to leave. Officer Wise and Officer Mallo then walked up to escort [Meyer] out of the auditorium.

The summary tries to cover the lack of words spoken by police with an excess of words about what they claimed was their mindset and intent:

Officer interviews detail their mindset when making contact with [Meyer]... Officer Wise stated it was his intent to merely escort [Meyer] from the auditorium at that time...

We learn that before Meyer began questioning Kerry,

Officer Mallo spoke to [Meyer] and requested to meet with [Meyer] outside after the forum. Officer Mallo stated her intention was to issue [Meyer] a Judicial Affairs form and explain to [Meyer] the UF Code of Conduct.

Note the word "requested". Police only "request" for consent - i.e., when you are legally free to say no, as in a request for a consensual search. Otherwise they "command". So, again, the report summary unwittingly reveals the absurdity of police claims: Meyer is charged with felony resisting arrest for simply declining a prior police request to meet outside (which they failed to repeat before grabbing him) - even though police admit there was no intent to arrest him.

Perhaps the summary's biggest challenge to our senses was the conclusion that the Taser deployment was used as a last resort, following a prolonged struggle with Meyer. The use of force investigation completely omitted any mention of the earlier Taser deployment, shown in the videos (and above photo) no more than 15 seconds after the mike was shut off (85 seconds before the first "Don'tTase Me Bro"), and described in the police report of Pablo DeJesus Jr (http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/19/document-drop-the-andrew-meyer-taser-stunt-police-report):

I drew out my department issued X-26 taser to respond to Meyer's active physical resistance and/or to possibly gain compliance from Meyer. I gave Meyer verbal commands to "put your hands behind your back," but he continued his active physical resistance. I was promptly non-verbally directed, by shaking his head no, to re-holster the X-26 by Sergeant King #32 [aka "Bro"].

Alma Mater or Alma Incarcerus?

The US prison population is now at 2.2 million, by far the highest in the world. But the US prison system is not only growing in number, but is rapidly extending its turf. Traditionally, communities of African, Hispanic, and Native Americans have been maximum security units where police freely killed, tortured, and kidnapped without penalty. Then the bogus wars on drugs and gangs became the pretext for removing what little protections were left in those communities. To ensure that community imprisonment was not just de facto, but de jure, DNA profiling has expanded along familial lines. Along came the phony war on terror, used to extend the prison to a wider group, with mass detentions and loss of fundamental rights like habeas corpus. Now college students are seeing their campuses become the next frontier in the Great US Prison Empire.

Anyone who still thinks we are we merely "heading towards a police state" better wake up: the train pulled into that station years ago. Keep sleeping and you may miss the last chance to avoid the next stop.

joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #52 
Pac's Life, Part 1: Kevin Hackie
Published Monday, October 29, 2007 8:00 AM        
       
               
                                                                                                                                                                                                               
By Martin A. Berrios
Ever since the death of Tupac Shakur there have been various stories, rumors, and mistruths floating throughout the streets. Even after eleven years of questions amongst the masses, no arrest has yet been made surrounding his murder. With the release of Tupac Assassination, filmmakers R.J. Bond and "Big Frank" Alexander attempt to put the pieces together on what really went down leading up to that tragic evening in Vegas.  In a Q&A session that followed a recent private screening of the documentary, former Tupac bodyguard Kevin Hackie stated that he was working for the FBI during his tenure at Deathrow Records and dispelled the reports of him being a government witness. 

With this startling piece of information now into play all eyes are on him.  In an explosive interview he dwarfs his previous shocking allegations that police corruption has always been the major hurdle in closing this case by actually naming the shooter.  AllHipHop.com gets a true inside look of what really happened to one of the greatest rappers of all time, from Hackie’s perpective. 

AllHipHop.com: Give us a little introduction to yourself for all the readers who may not be all the way familiar with your story?

Kevin Hackie: I was a police officer for about seventeen years and I’m currently the CEO of a security company.  I worked undercover for about three and a half years for the government. Reggie Wright [General Manager of Death Row Records] I’ve known for about twenty years now. 

AllHipHop.com: You and Reggie Wright both were officers in the Compton police department together correct?

Kevin Hackie: Right, well I worked the school district gang unit and Reggie worked city.  But my primary focus was the schools but obviously we handled the overflow and everything.

AllHipHop.com: As the story has been told to me Reggie Wright left the police department and went on to work at Death Row Records.  He simultaneously would also head up a company called Wright Way Security which primarily handled the security for Suge Knight and all the Death Row artists.  When did you start moonlighting as a security officer for Deathrow Records?

Kevin Hackie: In 1992, but late 92’.

AllHipHop.com: At that time were you still a Compton police officer or were you working with the FBI?

Kevin Hackie: Police officer, I worked double.  I was still a police officer and I was paid by the government for three years and I was still paid by the police department too. 

AllHipHop.com: I’ve heard that you were a Compton police officer and then got arrested for unregistered firearm charges.  Is that true or was it fabricated to conceal your link to the FBI?

Kevin Hackie: Right, my case ended up being overturned on appeal it was about seven months total [jail time]. 

AllHipHop.com: When did you get promoted to the FBI? 

Kevin Hackie: It wasn’t really a promotion.  I’ll tell you how it all happened.  I had applied to be a DEA agent, a drug enforcement agent.  Then one thing led to the next and it was announced to me that they were watching Reggie [Wright] and Suge [Knight].  Basically I got called into the chief’s office and I was introduced to a couple of FBI agents and that’s how everything got started.  Basically there was a promise [made] that they were going to do this and that for me.  You know forward my application for me and one thing led to the next.  I went through the next three years.  At the end of the day once he [Tupac] was shot I had a falling out with the lead agent in charge over the case and that’s how the story ended.

AllHipHop.com: Was the decision to moonlight as security for Deathrow Records a decision of yours or a mandate from the FBI?

Kevin Hackie: No, I was already in place.  I was already working [there].  I was the closest one to Reggie Wright at the time.  I was the closest one on the inside. 

AllHipHop.com: Did the FBI divulge their reasons for keeping their eyes and ears on Deathrow Records?

Kevin Hackie: They had suspected Reggie of carrying out..um how can I say this, criminal activities for Suge Knight. 

AllHipHop.com:  I need you to elaborate on that.

Kevin Hackie: I can’t but you can also note that there was a Long Beach police officer who worked undercover with me also.

AllHipHop.com: Who is the police officer in question?

Kevin Hackie: I can’t give you his name because he is still an active police officer.

AllHipHop.com: Okay.  So what you are saying is that this police officer in question was working security for Deathrow Records?

Kevin Hackie: Yes.

AllHipHop.com: Where did the misconception that you were a government witness start to come up versus you just working alongside the FBI?

Kevin Hackie: That all came about with the [Christopher] Wallace case; I ended up having a lawsuit against the city of Los Angeles.  The city of Los Angeles, well a particular detective sold my files to my understanding for a half of million dollars.  That’s where the Rolling Stone article came about. It was about five or six years ago?

AllHipHop.com: Yes the article was called “The Murder Of The Notorious B.I.G.” It came out in 2001.  The article broke the story about the alleged cover ups in the LAPD in regards to closing the B.I.G. homicide case.

Kevin Hackie: LAPD of course had a file on me but all of the documents which were ten to twelve different tapes, all the wire taps, a particular individual sold all that. 

AllHipHop.com: Really?

Kevin Hackie: Yeah that’s all that stuff went into that [article] and of course the Wallace family, you know about the lawsuit a couple of years ago?  And you know quite frankly I didn’t want to be involved in that situation any more.  That’s where it came about with the informant [accusations], because they had all the documentation of course from the LAPD and privy of course to the tapes…because the tapes they finally had to handover the tapes to me obviously from a federal lawsuit in 2001.  I don’t know if you are familiar with the Wallace case and my case; Judge Florence Cooper is the same judge in both cases.  She was the judge in my city case which settled out and settled the Wallace case.

AllHipHop.com: How did those tapes and documents get taken from you by that particular individual?

Kevin Hackie: They weren’t stolen from me, someone in the LAPD sold them; internal affairs. 

AllHipHop.com: The Tupac Assassination documentary that comes out shortly basically points the finger at two individuals that were behind Pac’s murder.  Clearly with your past you are very familiar with these two individuals in question.  Do you agree with the film’s conclusion?

Kevin Hackie: I agree 110%.

AllHipHop.com: Help me out here.   Since I am not able to divulge the names of those two individuals that the documentary points the finger to at this time can you give me further insight on what went down the night of Pac’s murder?

Kevin Hackie: Well the bottom line is Orlando Anderson and you can quote this did shoot Tupac.  There’s no doubt about that.  There is an arrest warrant…there is a paper trail in 1998 [that] he was going to be arrested for this crime actually about twenty four hours before he was shot.  Of course obviously [there were] individuals still working within the Compton police department as you know Reggie’s [Wright] dad [Reggie Wright Sr.] was still a lieutenant or a LA county sheriff at the time.  But of course he [Orlando Anderson] mysteriously ends up dead the next day.  There’s a paper trail to that. 

AllHipHop.com: What’s your take on Orlando Anderson?  It was revealed to me he never even had tickets to that Mike Tyson / Bruce Seldon fight that went down in Las Vegas the night Pac got hit.  Do you believe that scuffle between Orlando and Deathrow was staged to differ attention on the murder away from the actual two individuals in question?

Kevin Hackie: By all means.  I’ll put it to you this way, I’d put up my money ten million double my money or nothing.  I’ll leave it at that.

AllHipHop.com: That’s a bold statement.  Is it true there were FBI agents in cars tailing Tupac the night that he got shot?

Kevin Hackie: Yup.

AllHipHop.com: Were they tailing him because…

Kevin Hackie: Draw your own conclusions, let’s leave it at that.

AllHipHop.com: Any reason why the FBI would keep real a close eye on Pac but when he gets killed the homicide case is not handled properly at all?

Kevin Hackie: First of all I can tell you right now it was no secret that the government had no love for Tupac Shakur.  Excuse my French, it was a case of another n***a that had money and then the Hip-Hop game was dirty anyway and throughout my affidavit which these answers will be brought out.  By no means whatsoever this kid wasn’t a gang member; it was just hype to sell records.  But I know first hand that they [the government] didn’t care for him and the new district attorney in Clark County David Roger; that’s somebody you may want to give a call to.  David Roger, he is actually the new district attorney.  You may want to call him or either email him.  I’ve had some back and forth communications with him last week email wise. 

AllHipHop.com: He’s located in Las Vegas correct?

Kevin Hackie: He’s the head district attorney.  It’s up to him to go ahead to convene a grand jury.  Contrary to popular belief most of the strip that people think of as a strip is not in Las Vegas it’s in Clark County.  The county’s district attorney office really and truly needs to push forward but obviously the Las Vegas police never presented a case and of course you have basically the Las Vegas Metro Police saying that Compton PD f***ed it up.  And of course you have Compton police officers saying well Las Vegas police f***ed it up. And with Compton police in their eyes, they solved the case. 

AllHipHop.com: Do you agree that Compton police solved the case?

Kevin Hackie: Well yes and no they did solve the case.  But at the end of the day you’re not going to want to crucify one of your own because what’s going to happen?  You are going to have another Rampart scandal even though Compton police department is no longer in existence you are still going to have a big scandal. 

AllHipHop.com: It’s a political hot potato that nobody wants to hold.

Kevin Hackie: Exactly, no one wants responsibility for it. 

AllHipHop.com: In your opinion will this case ever be solved?

Kevin Hackie: I think at this point in time after eleven years I think at this point in time I think there should be some closure to the case hopefully.  There are new people in place management wise as far as enforcement and I think at this point in time the case can be solved.  I’m multiracial.  My mother is Puerto Rican and my father is white; Jewish.  Bottom line if Tupac Shakur was white, you know and I know this case would have been solved.  We have a prime example with this OJ [Simpson] situation right now. 

AllHipHop.com: Yeah it mirrors that infamous Dave Chappelle Show sketch about racial injustice where he said Nicole Simpson can’t rap.

Kevin Hackie: Exactly. He didn’t warrant anything to lock him up there with no bail on a bottom line bullsh*t case.  I mean here we are in 2007 there’s still unfair treatment.  If Tupac had of been white, no problem.  You got to remember at that time, let’s face it Deathrow Records was controlling everything. 

AllHipHop.com: Be a little more clear for me, not just the record industry correct?

Kevin Hackie: Okay, not just the record industry.  There were a lot of people on the payroll, a lot of people. 

AllHipHop.com: I’m assuming that’s the same assumption that could be applied to the Christopher Wallace homicide case as well?

Kevin Hackie: Exactly.  What you might want to note is that LAPD detective Greg Kading concurred with me that there will be an arrest in the Wallace case shortly.  Greg Kading who’s status with the LAPD and you can quote this, is confidential said there will be an arrest made shortly. 

AllHipHop.com: With all the information you just divulged to me do you ever fear for your life with the people you believe to be involved in both murders?

Kevin Hackie: I’m in fear for my life everyday, always have been.  But I think at this point in time if I come up and something happens to me I think there would be a public outcry in a sense.  We know who pulled the trigger, there’s no doubt about it.

AllHipHop.com: In closing what’s next for you?

Kevin Hackie: What’s next for me?

AllHipHop.com: Yes.

Kevin Hackie: Make another ten million next year.  That’s it (laughs).  And for the record this isn’t informant money, I have my own successful security company. 


Stay tuned for AllHipHop.com exclusive interview with Reggie Wright.
joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #53 
Abusive cop loses appeal
By John Diedrich
Thursday, Nov 1 2007, 06:30 PM

Robert Henry, a Milwaukee cop who was caught on tape roughing up a suspect in 2002, fired and reinstated, then went on disability leave, has lost an appeal in federal court.

Henry sued after his firing, claiming racial discrimination by former Chief Arthur Jones, but U.S. District Judge J.P. Stadtmueller found in favor of the city.

The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Stadtmueller in an opinion issued today.

Henry was not criminally charged, and he later successfully filed for lifelong disability payments after he said he suffered stress for being fired. He remains on disability leave from MPD.

On March 20, 2002, a surveillance camera filmed Henry roughing up Billy Miles, who had been arrested on suspicion of disorderly conduct.

The tape, shot in a police station's holding room, shows Miles gesturing toward Henry, who is seated at a desk. After several hand gestures by Miles, Henry walks toward him, shoves him against a wall, grabs him around the neck and wrestles him onto a table. Several officers then separate the men.

After the altercation, Henry flexes his arm and pats his biceps.
joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #54 
                                EW cop apologizes; expects firing, conviction for sex chats with girl                        
Against his lawyer's advice, an East Windsor police officer accused of trying to seduce an 11-year-old former neighbor via the Internet dramatically apologized for his conduct in a Hartford federal courtroom on Monday.

                                But even as he did so, Officer Darren E. Seligman maintained that he never intended to meet with the girl.

That could represent a legal defense against the criminal charge Seligman is facing: attempting to entice a minor into illegal sexual activity via an "interstate facility," the Internet.

But Seligman made clear that he expects to be fired from his job and convicted of a felony.

"I understand I'm losing my job and throwing away my career," Seligman said during a brief U.S. District Court hearing, which came just a week after his arrest. He added that he "will likely be a convicted felon and sex offender."

Seligman, who is jailed without bail, said he feels as if he is in a nightmare, adding, "It's of my own doing."

Standing sideways, to address both Magistrate Judge Thomas P. Smith and people in the small courtroom's gallery, Seligman apologized to his family and others.

He seemed at certain points to be speaking directly to a man and woman sitting together in the front row. They declined to speak to a reporter after court.

Hope of 'being a father'

"I hope I can go back to being a father of my little guys," Seligman said. He is divorced and has 5- and 6-year-old sons.

The criminal charge he is facing carries a minimum prison sentence of 10 years. Given that federal prisoners generally spend at least 85 percent of their sentences in custody, such a sentence could mean that he would miss almost half his sons' growing-up years.

It is highly unusual for a defendant to speak publicly at so early a stage of a criminal case. Although Seligman's statements may not have represented a confession, a number of the things he said, including his apologies, could be used against him if his case goes to trial.

But East Windsor police Capt. Roger Hart - who is in charge of the department's internal investigation of Seligman and was sitting in the courtroom gallery - said later that he wasn't surprised the officer spoke up.

"He's the type of person who seems to speak his mind," Hart said. "That's why I came here today. I thought he might make a statement, and he did.

"I was happy to see him apologize to the family," Hart added. "Those are certain statements of guilt and certainly can be used against him in the internal process."

Pay already lost

Immediately after Seligman's arrest, he was placed on paid administrative leave. But Hart said the department switched Seligman to unpaid status as of last Friday.

East Windsor police didn't receive the affidavit detailing the investigation that led to Seligman's arrest until after the federal magistrate judge ordered it made public at Monday's hearing. But Hart said the FBI was able to release certain documents to the department earlier, which formed the basis for the move to an unpaid suspension.

Police computer used?

The affidavit - by Avon police Sgt. Kelly Walsh, who is assigned to the FBI-led Connecticut Computer Crimes Task Force - says an Internet protocol address assigned to East Windsor police has been used to gain access to Seligman's America Online instant messaging account.

But Hart said there is no evidence that Seligman communicated with the girl while on duty. "At no time was he talking while he was working," the captain said.

Walsh said in her affidavit that the investigation of Seligman began Oct. 22, just over two weeks ago, when the 11-year-old's mother contacted the FBI after finding a message on her daughter's cell phone about the girl looking nice naked.

According to Walsh, the investigation uncovered the following information:

* After finding the cell-phone message, the mother left her computer logged on with her daughter's screen name. When the girl received an instant message, the mother pretended to be her daughter and had an online chat in which the other party discussed sex and the possibility of meeting at a nearby pond.

* At the end of the conversation, the other party suggested that the girl come to the meeting in "jammies," without underwear, and said, "i teach u somethin you wont believe! ... better than health class!!"

* Based on information in the chat, the mother believed the other party was Seligman, who lived near her family in Mansfield for about two years, until the family moved away in August.

* The mother told investigators that Seligman had offered to take her daughter to events or to the park when she was as young as 9. The mother said she considered this behavior odd and confronted him about it at one point. She said he expressed outrage, reminding her that he was a police officer.

* Records showed that the messaging account used in the chat with the mother was frequently used from an Internet protocol address for which the subscriber was listed as Darren Dempsey. Based on information from the state Department of Motor Vehicles and a credit report, "Darren Dempsey" appeared to be an alias for Seligman, Walsh wrote.

* Walsh then pretended to be the 11-year-old and had her own online chats with Seligman. He discussed sexual topics in explicit terms and expressed sexual intentions toward the girl.

* Seligman also sent her links to pornographic material and said at one point, "i could go to jail," explaining that it was because of "the age thing i think." He added, "its kinda stupid i think ... but the laws the law."

On Monday, Seligman waived his right to an immediate hearing on whether he should be released on bail, although he can seek such a hearing at any time.

In an apparent reference to the sexual content of the online chats, Seligman said in court, "I have tended to talk like that, as pathetic as it may be."

He added that he didn't do so with people of any specific age and that he had no "kiddie porn" on his computer.

As to whether he had any intent to meet the girl, he said, "I had none."
joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #55 

Police officer's 4th wife is missing; officials to exhume 3rd wife

                                                                               
                                        x
Mark Carlson / Associated Press
The grave site of Kathleen Savio, the third wife of Bolingbrook (Ill.) Police Officer Drew Peterson whose bloody and bruised body was found in her bathtub in 2004. The death was ruled accidental. Authorities and volunteers are currently searching for Peterson's fourth wife.
                                       
                                                                                               
Kathleen Savio's family long suspected her husband in her death, which was ruled accidental; now the case is reopened.
                                                                                                                                               
By P.J. Huffstutter, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer                                                
November 10, 2007                                                
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        CHICAGO --                                 For years, the family of Kathleen Savio has insisted that her police officer ex-husband was involved in her 2004 death.

They refused to believe an inquest's finding that she had accidentally drowned. Her body had been found face down in an empty bathtub. They said Savio had feared her husband, a veteran police officer in the middle-class suburb of Bolingbrook.

It wasn't until Drew Peterson's next wife, Stacy Ann Peterson, mysteriously disappeared two weeks ago, that their claims were taken more seriously. Investigators launched a search for Stacy on Oct. 29. Days later, they reopened the case of Kathleen Savio.

On Friday, as search teams scoured nearby woods for 23-year-old Stacy Peterson, a judge granted a request by Will County State's Atty. James Glasgow to exhume Savio's body.

Police consider the 53-year-old police sergeant a suspect in the disappearance of his fourth wife, a state law enforcement official said.

"I would say this case has shifted from a missing person case to a possible homicide case," Illinois State Police Capt. Carl Dobrich said at a news conference Friday.

State police officials, who have searched Peterson's home and taken a computer and some weapons, said he has cooperated with them since Stacy vanished Oct. 28.

Peterson could not be reached for comment Friday.

He has told reporters that Savio's death was an "unusual accident," and told police he had nothing to do with Stacy's disappearance. Peterson reportedly said he last spoke with Stacy by cellphone on the evening she disappeared. Peterson said his wife told him she was leaving him for another man.

The court petition to exhume Savio's body from the Queen of Heaven Catholic Cemetery in Hillside, Ill., outlined numerous "suspicious" facts tied to the 40-year-old's death.

Her body was found with a one-inch gash on the back of her head, and abrasions on her body. Originally, it was believed Savio had injured her head and fallen into a slow-draining tub, where she drowned.

A review of "the photographs of the crime scene and autopsy, the autopsy protocol and police reports shows in part that the one-inch gash on the back of Kathleen Savio's head did not render her unconscious, which would have been necessary for her to accidentally drown in the bathtub," according to the petition.

In addition, the patterns of blood found in the tub did not match the original explanation of Savio's cause of death. Instead, according to the petition, the "evidence is consistent with the 'staging' of an accident to conceal a homicide."

The petition also noted that "additional evidence has been obtained relative to the death of Kathleen Savio during the investigation into the disappearance of Stacy Peterson." It did not say what the evidence was, and investigators declined to comment.

Savio's family supported Glasgow's bid to exhume her body and reopen the case, according to the petition. They believed Savio had long feared for her life.

In 2002, Savio got a temporary order of protection against her husband, after alleging that he physically abused her. Drew Peterson had been having an affair with "a minor," Savio wrote in a letter to the state's attorney's office, adding that she feared her husband might try to kill her.

Stacy was 17 when she met Peterson.

"It's sad that it took Stacy going missing for anyone to look into what happened to my aunt," Melissa Doman, Savio's niece, told reporters Friday. "Now, we might get some answers."
joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #56 
November 11, 2007
Chief: Officers had sex while on duty

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS


An internal investigation by the Durham Police Department involves allegations that officers engaged in inappropriate sexual conduct with prostitutes while on duty, according to the police chief.

“We have suspicion that it may involve other women,” Chief Jose Lopez Sr. said. “We know that they’re all not prostitutes.”

Three officers have been cleared of wrongdoing and have returned to work, Lopez said. The allegations came to light when officers conducting a vice investigation discovered patrol officers taking part in sexual acts, he said.

The length of the investigation depends partly on when evidence is returned from a lab, Lopez said. He did not elaborate on what that evidence is.

Lopez took office as chief two months ago.

On Oct. 29, he met with Gregory K. Baker, the special agent in charge of the FBI’s field office in Raleigh, to discuss whether the allegations involved any federal violations. Baker said that there was no federal interest in the case.

Lopez also contacted David Saacks, Durham’s district attorney, who said Friday that he has not received the investigation’s final report.

Lopez said Friday that fewer than 10 officers have been placed on administrative leave with pay.

In recent months, the N.C. Highway Patrol has fired a trooper accused of abducting Hispanic women and making sexual advances to them and another accused of targeting young women for stops. In September, a judge ruled that a trooper fired for having sex in a patrol car and an office should be allowed to return to work.

The judge found that several others engaged in similar or worse conduct but were allowed to remain on the force.

The last time prostitution allegations hit the Durham Police Department was in 1991, when word of a officer-run prostitution ring led to investigations by the department and the State Bureau of Investigation, which exonerated the accused officers.


joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #57 

Officer charged with holding gun to cop galpal

                                                                                                                               
                                                                                By Jessica Van Sack
                                        Tuesday, November 13, 2007 -
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                               
        EmailE-mail          PrintablePrintable          Comments(8) Comments           LargerSmallerText size          ShareShare         Rate(3) Rate
                                                                                               

A Duxbury cop will be arraigned today on charges of domestic violence against his girlfriend, a Milton police officer, after he allegedly took her weapon and held it to her head last month, officials said.

Sean T. Moran, 30, is also accused of beating his girlfriend after a party on Friday night at the Common Market Quincy, said Quincy Police Chief Robert Crowley.

“At some point there was a verbal argument,” Crowley said, citing police reports that allege “the suspect banged the victim’s head against a chain link fence.”

After arriving home, the woman fled with her dog to her mother’s home in Milton. Police say she told them that on Oct. 18, Moran stripped her of her service weapon, held it to her head, and threatened to kill himself if she told anyone. Duxbury officials, who could not be reached, removed Moran’s service weapon from his locker, Crowley said. Moran is charged with malicious damage to property, assault and battery with a dangerous weapon and domestic assault and battery.

joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #58 
a species that hires bodyguards to protect them looses the ability to protect themselves , looses their sense of community and is doomed to extinction

Not to worry this couldn't happen here!

Report: Troopers have caused nearly 500 crashes in last 7 years

November 20, 2007

BOSTON—State troopers have caused nearly 500 crashes in their cruisers over the past seven years, including instances in which officers were inattentive, speeding or following cars too closely, according to WBZ-TV.
more stories like this

The WBZ-TV analysis of 2,600 cruiser accidents also shows nearly 120 officers have had four or more crashes in the past seven years.

State Police chief Col. Mark Delaney said the problem needs to be addressed. State Police officers log 54 million miles a year in hazardous weather and driving conditions, Delaney said in the report broadcast Monday evening.

But police data shows the majority of crashes occur on dry roadways with clear skies and while officers are either commuting from home, working a detail or on a regular police patrol, according to the report.

Troopers are allowed to investigate themselves in accidents in which no one is injured and there is less than $1,000 in damages -- despite potential conflict of interests. They frequently clear themselves of wrongdoing, according to the report.

Senior State Police officers have cleared their troopers in 55 percent of the total crashes and found them partially at fault only about seven percent of the time. They have been found to have caused the crash about 19 percent of the time, the report said, citing crash records.

"I think inherently you can't investigate yourself ... you can't be objective," Delaney told WBZ-TV. "I think that might be a glitch in the system."

Even when troopers are cleared of causing the accident, the circumstances can still raise questions.

Michael Benson of Weston claims he was making a left turn off Park Drive in Boston during rush hour in April 2006, when he was struck in his left passenger side by motorcycle Trooper Joaquin Miranda.

Miranda, 48, has had seven crashes since August 2001, according to the data. He has never been found at fault, according to the report.

The officer was cleared of his latest accident in February by Sgt. Dennis Bertulli, who was sanctioned by his bosses for plowing into a pedestrian at this year's Boston Marathon.

Other troopers have had repeat accidents in which they were the only motorist involved. Trooper Matthew Croteau, 34, has had five crashes in four years, including four single-vehicle crashes in which he lost control of his cruiser. The officer has been found at fault four times -- twice on patrol, once while commuting and once off duty, according to WBZ-TV.

Dennis Kenney, a former police officer and professor at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York, said police officers are given vehicles and are allowed to exceed the speed limit under certain circumstances, including emergency situations.

"The assumption I think the citizens have is that they are qualified to do so," Kenney said. "If they are having problems with accidents, that would suggest they may not be qualified to do so, which puts all of us at risk."
joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #59 

Trotwood, FBI probe use of stun gun on pregnant woman

By James Cummings

Staff Writer

Thursday, November 29, 2007

TROTWOOD — Trotwood police and the Federal Bureau of Investigation are reviewing the use of a stun gun on a woman who attempted to turn over her 1-year-old son to police on Nov. 18.

It was discovered after the woman was subdued and taken to the Montgomery County jail that she was seven months pregnant, according to Mike Etter, Trotwood director of public safety.


Etter said the officer involved in the incident is still on the job while reviews are underway to determine if excessive force was used. But Etter said while the use of the stun gun is being analyzed, he said the officer had no choice but to attempt to stop the woman when she attempted to leave with the child when the officer asked her questions.

"If he hadn't detained her and something had happened to that child, every child advocate in the world would have been on our case, and rightly so," Etter said.

Etter said the incident began at 11:41 a.m. on Nov. 18 when a 33-year-old Dayton woman entered the lobby of the Trotwood police department and picked up a phone there to tell officers that she wanted to turn her 1-year-old son to police.

Etter said "Safe Haven" laws allow mothers to give newborn babies within days of birth to authorities with no questions asked, but the law doesn't cover toddlers.

A patrol officer was dispatched to the lobby and attempted to get information from the woman about herself and about the child, but she refused to answer questions, Etter said. She would not give her name, the child's name or the father's name, and she would not answer questions about the child's medical history.

"All she would say was that she was tired of playing games with the father," Etter said.

After talking with the officer for a short time, the woman attempted to leave with the child. At that time the officer grabbed her sleeve to keep her from leaving, and told her he was placing her under arrest for child endangering, Etter said.

The woman resisted and continuing trying to leave the police offices. The officer was able to pull the child away from the woman and attempted to force her to the ground.

A second officer arrived in the police department lobby, and the first officer passed the child to the second officer and forced the woman to the floor on her stomach, Etter said.

The officer struggling with the woman got one of her hands into a handcuff, but she refused to allow him to cuff the other hand. That's when the officer applied a stun gun to the woman's neck to get her to comply with his orders, Etter said.

Trotwood police charged the woman, Valreca Redden, with child endangering and resisting arrest and transported her to the Montgomery County Jail. Officials at the jail realized the woman was pregnant and took her to a hospital.

The woman never said she was pregnant while in the Trotwood police station. He said she was wearing a heavy coat that hid her stomach, and the child was sitting on her lap for most of the time she was talking to the officer, Etter said.

The charges against the woman were later changed to obstruction of justice and resisting arrest, and she was released from custody, Etter said. He said the child was released to the custody of his biological father.

Etter said he heard about the incident several days after it happened. A major in the police department was assigned to conduct an internal investigation

Etter said he contacted the FBI this week after hearing from a civil rights organization representative who said the organization planned to ask for a federal investigation.

"We've been cooperating fully with the FBI," Etter said. "And we're reviewing our policies on the use of (stun guns)."

joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #60 

two easy reads for the eye

one on video, one in print




Veteran state trooper indicted

He pleads not guilty to distributing cocaine

Email|Print| Text size + By John R. Ellement and Shelley Murphy Globe Staff / December 1, 2007

A veteran Massachusetts state trooper last night pleaded not guilty to federal charges that he sold cocaine out of his Saugus home, an allegation the State Police commander called "disheartening."

Trooper John T. Foley wore a long-sleeve gray T-shirt, black sweat pants, flip-flops - and handcuffs - when he made his initial appearance in US District Court about 6:40.

Foley, 62, was indicted on a single count of distributing cocaine on Oct. 11, but Assistant US Attorney George Vien indicated in court that more charges could be coming. He also said prosecutors want to seize Foley's Highland Street residence.

Foley is assigned to the Revere barracks and has been on the job since October 1971, according to a joint statement released by State Police and federal officials.

State Police Superintendent Colonel Mark F. Delaney, said in the statement, that he was dismayed by the arrest of Foley, who was taken into custody by State Police and federal law enforcement at 3:30 p.m. when he reported to work at the barracks in Revere.

"It is always disheartening when a law enforcement officer betrays his solemn oath of office by committing a criminal act," he said. "Not only has he dishonored himself, but he has wantonly betrayed troopers who risk their lives every day, enforcing the very laws he so willfully violated."

No details of Foley's alleged drug dealing were released in court last night, but sources familiar with the investigation said the single count is based on the alleged sale of 3 grams of cocaine.

The arrest grew out of a joint investigation by the federal Drug Enforcement Administration and the FBI, officials said.

US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan said in a statement that Foley's alleged actions "are an affront to every decent, honest member of the Massachusetts State Police, who serve the public's interest and do their jobs with dedication and integrity . . . All of us in law enforcement are committed to investigating and expending the resources necessary to prosecuting corruption wherever we find it."

June W. Stansbury, special agent in charge of the New England Drug Enforcement Administration office, said in the release that the police officers who commit crimes undermine public confidence in every member of law enforcement.

"We will always investigate with fervor a sworn officer who has compromised honor by trafficking in drugs," she said.

Foley earned $102,531 in 2005, according to state payroll data collected by the Globe, but last night he told US District Court Magistrate Judge Robert Collings that he could not afford to hire a lawyer.

John Salsberg, a veteran Boston criminal defense attorney, was appointed to represent him. The attorney declined comment afterward.

During the brief court appearance, Foley was polite and generally calm. His voice seemed to quaver when the judge inquired about how much equity his family has in his Highland Street home.

"My wife, she pays all of that," Foley said.

Reached last night at her Saugus home, Patricia Foley declined comment.

Foley was originally a member of the Metropolitan Police Department, but joined the State Police when the two agencies merged in the 1990s.

If convicted of the single charge he now faces, Foley could be sentenced to up to 20 years in prison and fined $1 million.

Foley was released on his personal recognizance and is due back in court Dec. 11.
joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #61 
From the Michigan Citizen newspaper
 
Byron Ogletree (r) speaks to Council. Also shown are council members Alberta Tinsley-Talabi and Kwame Kenyatta.
Council hears stories of terror in Southwest Detroit

By Diane Bukowski

The Michigan Citizen

DETROIT — Two white Detroit police officers from the Southwestern District have conducted a reign of terror, involving public rape, beatings, and frame-ups of Black males, according to testimony given June 6 to the city council and interviews with The Michigan Citizen.

The officers are Michael Osman and Michael Parish, who work the afternoon shift. The two are known in their far southwest side neighborhood as “The Booty Boys” and “Starsky and Hutch,” according to four of their alleged victims, who testified at council.
[more]
joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #62 

Menino: Hub cop who hit his girlfriend a ‘coward’

                                                                                                                               
                                                                                By O’Ryan Johnson
                                        Monday, December 24, 2007 -
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                               
        EmailE-mail          PrintablePrintable          Comments(15) Comments           LargerSmallerText size          ShareShare         Rate(4) Rate
                                                                                               

Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino says the Boston police lieutenant who is serving 18 months court-ordered probation for punching his girlfriend off a Baltimore barstool is a “coward.”

“(Police Commissioner Edward) Davis has assured the mayor that he will do everything in his power to hold this coward accountable for his actions,” said Menino’s spokeswoman, Dot Joyce. “Domestic violence is a huge problem in our society. No one should be able to get away with raising a hand to anyone, especially a defenseless woman.”

Lt. David Murphy was suspended for 30 days on Dec. 19 but will only serve five of those days under an agreement worked out with the department. He is expected to return to work this week. He has been on paid leave since his April arrest in Baltimore for second-degree assault. A Maryland judge found him guilty and issued a probation before judgment order against Murphy.

“Murphy will have a criminal record but not a criminal conviction at the end of his probation term,” said Margaret T. Burns, director of communications with the Baltimore city state’s attorney’s office.

“The guilty finding will not stand after his successful completion of the probation.”

Davis said the department could fire Murphy without a conviction, but city lawyers told him they would undoubtedly lose the case at a civil service appeal and would be forced to write a check for missed pay, including details.

joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #63 

'E&P' Podcast: Secrets of Boosting Web Traffic Revealed!
UPDATE: Family May Sell Norfolk, Roanoke, Greensboro Papers
Looking to Unwind After Iowa Vote? 'Kung-fu Election' Online Game an Option
Monster Index: Four-Year Slow Down
Daniel Becker Named AP Director of Entertainment Content
PAULINE'S PICKS: NYTimes.com Creates Slick Video About High Line Park
Report: More Bumps For '08
'Kentucky Post' Lives On -- At Least In Web Site Name
TODAY'S LETTERS: Bilal Hussein, Endorsing Clinton, Reporting About Faith And More
'Wash Post' Reports On Anti-'Post' Union Campaign

| This week's top stories

State Police Probe Arrest Of Arkansas Journalist Covering House Fire

Published: December 13, 2007 2:05 PM ET

LITTLE ROCK, Ark State police are investigating the arrest of a weekly newspaper journalist by a state trooper at the scene of a house fire in Maumelle, an agency spokesman said this week.

On the night of Dec. 10, Bill Lawson parked his car, grabbed his camera and headed for the scene where firefighters were battling a chimney fire. He was stopped by Trooper Thomas Weindruch and arrested, according to Stephens Media, owner of the Maumelle Monitor.

"He kept me there handcuffed for probably 30 minutes with my back to the fire," Lawson said. "That was the worst part — I couldn't even see what was going on."

The suburban-Little Rock newspaper published Lawson's first-person account of the incident Dec. 11.

"Having lived 59 years, battled cancer, worn the country's uniform for 26 years and proudly worked as a journalist — a profession I always admired — I thought I'd seen it all," Lawson wrote. "That is until Monday night, when I was arrested and charged with a criminal offense just for trying to do my job and take photos of a residential fire in Maumelle."

Weindruch issued Lawson, 59, a citation ordering him to appear in Sherwood District Court on Feb. 26 on the charge of obstructing governmental operations. A conviction on the misdemeanor is punishable by up to 30 days in jail and a fine up to $100.

Bill Sadler, spokesman for the state police, said agency officials were gathering information about what occurred.

"We're trying to collect the facts of what occurred out there, and review what occurred, and see if there was any policy violation, and that's really all I can tell you right now," Sadler said on Dec. 11.

He said state police strive to be open and to work with the news media.

"But until we talk with the trooper and hear his side of the story, and review the recordings that are available (from equipment mounted in Weindruch's patrol car), I don't want to say anything," Sadler added.

He said the agency would respond "once the department is sure that it has all the facts."

joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #64 

Former Chicago officer who ripped off drug dealers gets 25 years behind bars

By Associated Press
Thursday, January 3, 2008 -

CHICAGO - The admitted leader of a band of Chicago police officers who ripped off drug dealers and funneled narcotics onto the city’s streets was sentenced today to 25 years in federal prison.

"You and your merry band essentially raped and plundered entire neighborhoods," U.S. District Judge Ronald told the former police officer, Broderick Jones, in imposing the sentence.

Jones, 36, pleaded guilty to getting information from gang members about where drugs were stashed and leading fellow officers in staging mock raids during which they confiscated the narcotics.

Instead of arresting the dealers and turning in the drugs, Jones and his fellow officers turned the narcotics over to other dealers.

After his grandmother and 16-year-old daughter took the witness stand and testified that he had always been a good family man, Jones addressed Guzman and pleaded for a lenient sentence.

"Have mercy on me," said Jones, who has been behind bars for three years. "I pray every night that God will take greed out of my heart."

Guzman said he took into consideration that Jones had a good record as a Navy aircraft mechanic in the Persian Gulf War, working on F-14 Tomcats aboard the aircraft carrier USS Forrestal.

But the judge said Jones had taken an oath to uphold the law and had to be punished severely for his "depraved violation of this oath."

joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #65 
Judge gives break to rogue cop who turned federal witness

Associated Press - January 4, 2008 2:24 PM ET

CHICAGO (AP) - A rogue officer who turned government witness and helped federal prosecutors dismantle a drug ring within Chicago's police department has been sentenced to nine years and six months in prison.

The sentence U.S. District Judge Ronald Guzman imposed on 37-year-old Corey Flagg today was stiff but represented a sizable break in exchange for his cooperation.

The sentences Guzman handed out yesterday to three other former officers snared in the investigation ranged from 19 to 40 years.

A joint FBI and Chicago police investigation of the ring led to charges against five former officers and five alleged drug dealers two years ago.

The officers were accused of staging mock raids during which they confiscated narcotics from dealers, but instead of turning in the drugs they gave them to other dealers.

joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #66 
notice no$ value is given to missing drugs

a species that hires bodyguards to protect it looses
 the ability to protect itself and is doomed to extinction

                                               

Commissioner: Someone tampered with Boston drug evidence

                                                                                                                                               
Email|Print| Text size +                                                                                                                                                 January 4, 2008 04:35 PM                                                
                                               
                                               
                                                                                               

By Maria Cramer, Globe Staff

A sweeping, 14-month investigation into evidence tampering at the Boston Police Department central drug depository has revealed that someone either improperly removed or tampered with drugs confiscated in nearly 1,000 cases, Commissioner Edward F. Davis said today.
       
The drugs taken included cocaine, heroin, marijuana, and OxyContin, said Davis, who said that most likely the culprit was an officer because only police are allowed into the depository.

The FBI, prosecutors from Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley's office, and Boston police have launched a criminal investigation to determine who stole the drugs. And the revelation that at least one officer may have stolen drugs has sparked Davis to launch audits of all department units.
       
"We're really going to shake the place out and make sure that every department is up to national standards," Davis said.

The 12 officers who worked at the depository were removed last October, after police launched the investigation.

The audit examined 110,000 pieces of drug evidence from more than 74,000 cases between 1990 and 2006. Police officials had planned to audit only a small portion of the evidence in storage, but conducted a more thorough examination after they learned that someone had tampered with drugs after the audit was announced.
       
"It's an unprecedented step to do a complete inventory of drug evidence," Davis said. "I don't know anybody else in the Commonwealth who has done that."


Judge gives break to rogue cop who turned federal witness


Associated Press - January 4, 2008 2:24 PM ET

CHICAGO (AP) - A rogue officer who turned government witness and helped federal prosecutors dismantle a drug ring within Chicago's police department has been sentenced to nine years and six months in prison.

The sentence U.S. District Judge Ronald Guzman imposed on 37-year-old Corey Flagg today was stiff but represented a sizable break in exchange for his cooperation.

The sentences Guzman handed out yesterday to three other former officers snared in the investigation ranged from 19 to 40 years.

A joint FBI and Chicago police investigation of the ring led to charges against five former officers and five alleged drug dealers two years ago.

The officers were accused of staging mock raids during which they confiscated narcotics from dealers.


                                               


joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #67 
ADVERTISEMENT
               

Ex-FBI agent may sue over arrest
Man says police assaulted him at his business

A former special agent for the FBI has filed a complaint against Lafayette police officers he says wrongfully arrested and assaulted him during their response to a reported burglary in progress at his office building.

Garland Jean-Batiste was charged with resisting arrest by Officer Jason Herpin early Thursday morning.

                       
ADVERTISEMENT 
                                               

Around 11 p.m. Wednesday night, officers responded to the office complex at 920 W. Pinhook Road, where Jean-Batiste runs his Cajun/Creole sausage business.

Jean-Batiste said he approached officers to ask what was happening on the premises and officers yelled for him to get down on the pavement.

"I complied and I tried to identify myself," he said Friday during a news conference in the office of his attorney, Derriel McCorvey. "My head was slammed into the pavement. Three officers pinned me down. ... My left arm was trapped under my back. One officer told me to stop resisting. I wasn't resisting. I couldn't move my hand."

He said he received injuries to his neck, head, face and back and received treatment at UMC before being booked into the Lafayette Parish Correctional Center at 2 a.m. Thursday.

The initial report filed by Herpin states that officers witnessed the suspect, Jean-Batiste, running through the parking lot.

"After several commands to stop running and get on the ground, the suspect refused and was placed onto the ground by officers," the report stated. "Suspect then refused to place his hands behind his back. After a brief struggle on the ground, officers were able to gain control of the suspect and place him under arrest."

Lafayette police spokesman Cpl. Paul Mouton confirmed that a complaint was filed against the Police Department, but the department would not release further information about the filed complaint or the incident.

"What arrest was he resisting?" McCorvey said. "How can a person be charged and beat up for resisting arrest at his own business?"

It's possible, according to J.N. Prather, assistant district attorney.

"The law reads that you can be charged with resisting an officer for the intentional interference with or obstruction of a lawful arrest or the lawful detention," Prather said. "Lawful detention is the key word."

The charge is a misdemeanor and carry a $500 fine and no more than six months of jail time. Whether or not the district attorney's office prosecutes on the sole charge of resisting arrest is discretionary, depending upon sufficient evidence to support the charge, said Prather, commenting in general terms about the charge of resisting arrest.

McCorvey said he and his client are investigating the possibility of filing a lawsuit, but will wait to see how the department's investigation into their complaint pans out.

The two called the press conference to air Jean-Batiste's reaction to the incident following a local media report that contained what McCorvey called "misinformation."

"We're trying to address the damage done to my client's reputation," McCorvey said.

Jean-Batiste, a running back for LSU from 1983-86 and the New Orleans Saints in 1987, now owns his own a Cajun and Creole sausage business - Jean-Batiste Foods. He said until last year he had been a special agent with the FBI working in the Lafayette office. His prior experience included nearly four years for the state police and a year for the St. Martin Parish Sheriff's Office.

"The last three years I was in the FBI, I investigated civil rights violations by police officers and now I've become a victim," Jean-Batiste said.

McCorvey said in his investigation of the incident, he was able to find a witness who stated that officers were told by a woman on the scene that she broke a window in the complex and there was no burglary.

"This is a decorated law-enforcement guy," McCorvey said. "This is not a run-of- the-mill hoodlum or a knucklehead."

joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #68 
two quickies funded by you know what.....your taxes

a species that hires bodyguards to protect them looses the ability to protect itself and is doomed to extinction

$20M Settlement OK'd for Chicago Torture

By DEANNA BELLANDI – 17 hours ago

CHICAGO (AP) — Aldermen on Wednesday approved a nearly $20 million settlement with four former death-row inmates who claim they were tortured by Chicago police.

Some aldermen pushed for the settlement as a way to begin healing community relations with police after decades-old allegations of torture by former Lt. Jon Burge and officers under his command.

"It was a black eye on the city of Chicago and the people who live here — just terrible — so I hope it never happens again," said Alderman Ed Smith.

The settlement ends lawsuits by Leroy Orange, Stanley Howard, Aaron Patterson and Madison Hobley. All were pardoned in January 2003 by then-Gov. George Ryan when he commuted the sentences of every death row inmate in the state.

Special prosecutors last year released a report that said Burge led a group of officers that used beatings, electric shocks and other methods to get suspects, most of them black, to confess. Prosecutors have said they can't be charged because the statute of limitations expired.

Orange said the settlement money won't cure his mistrust of police or the anxieties and dreams he struggles with.

"I still think I'm gonna cringe and feel strange ... when I'm walking down the street and some policemen look at me and give me that look like they want to stop because I'm a African-American," he said after the City Council vote.

Burge was fired in the early 1990s after a police board said a murder suspect was abused while in custody. He has never been charged with any wrongdoing and now lives in Florida. An attorney for Burge has said he never tortured anyone.

Howard, who remained in prison on unrelated charges after he was pardoned, is to be paid $800,000, and his attorneys would get $1 million. The $19.8 million settlement also calls for Hobley to receive $7.5 million, Orange $5.5 million and Patterson $5 million.

Alderman Leslie Hairston apologized for their treatment and said that although the settlement brings closure to their cases, there are still problem police officers on the street.

"We still have many Jon Burges running around in each of our police departments, particularly in my neck of the woods," said Hairston, whose ward is on the South Side.

The City Council also voted to officially make former FBI agent Jody Weis the city's new police superintendent.

Weis has said he will strengthen training and work to bring public confidence back to the department. His predecessor, Phil Cline, announced his retirement last year amid allegations of excessive force, barroom brawls involving off-duty officers and a scandal in a disbanded gang and drug unit.

For Immediate Release
July 14th, 2004

SENATORS CONCERNED ABOUT MORE ALLEGED PROBLEMS AT FBI'S OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

WASHINGTON -

Sen. Chuck Grassley today sent a letter along with Sen. Patrick Leahy to Attorney General John Ashcroft and Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Robert Mueller asking for explanation for continued actions being taken at the Office of Professional Responsibility.

A copy of the letter follows here.

July 14, 2004

The Honorable John Ashcroft
Attorney General
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530 The Honorable Robert S. Mueller
Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20535

Dear Attorney General Ashcroft and Director Mueller:

We are writing to inquire and express concern about the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) continued targeting of Special Agent Robert Wright, a situation we had hoped and believed had been resolved after we raised the issue last year. Unfortunately, we have learned that the Justice Department (DOJ) has now inserted itself into the matter. Specifically, counsel for Agent Wright has informed us that the DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (DOJ OPR) intends to interview Agent Wright this month regarding unspecified allegations.

As Director Mueller will recall, we wrote with concerns about Agent Wright's predicament on June 12, 2003, after learning that the FBI had opened its fourth internal investigation against Agent Wright. Agent Wright was cleared of allegations investigated by the FBI's Office of Professional Responsibility (FBI OPR) in the three previous investigations. Our concern was that the latest investigation was a sign of the FBI's apparent haste to launch an OPR probe every time an agent speaks publicly about problems within the FBI.

Recent internal documents of the FBI provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee escalate our concerns about retaliation against Agent Wright.

According to the documents, after Agent Wright completed his June 2, 2003 press conference, the top two FBI OPR officials at the time discussed their plan to "take him out," for his public appearance and comments on a network television news program.

The materials provided to us include a summary of observations by former Special Agent John Roberts, who served as a Unit Chief in FBI OPR, and his wife Brenda, who served as a secretary in FBI OPR. FBI OPR officials sought to involve Mr. Roberts in the investigation against Agent Wright, but Mr. Roberts raised objections and concerns about the manner in which OPR officials were conducting themselves and the investigation.

The documents reflect that Mr. Weis instructed Mr. Roberts to open the case against Agent Wright in such a way that the Justice Department Office of Inspector General (DOJ OIG), which has the right of first refusal on all FBI allegations, would not initiate its own investigation, thus leaving the matter within the FBI. Mr. Weis also said that Mr. Jordan had already decided "to propose SA Wright for dismissal," based on their belief that Agent Wright committed insubordination, without even conducting an investigation.

According to the documents, when Mr. Roberts reviewed the allegation and information, he determined "there was no predication to open a case" in FBI OPR at headquarters. At most, the documents stated, the matter called for an investigation by the Chicago Field Office, where Agent Wright worked.

There are other irregularities raised by the documents. For example, FBI OPR officials allowed two persons interviewed in the investigation to review the FBI written summary (FD-302s) of their interview, even though FBI practice does not permit this.

Mr. Roberts' documents also reflect that an Assistant Special Agent-in-Charge (ASAC) of the Chicago field Office called Mr. Weis in an apparent attempt to smear Agent Wright in the media. The message, taken by Mrs. Roberts in her capacity as secretary, stated that several FBI agents "WANT PERMISSION TO SPEAK WITH A REPORTER FROM CHICAGO (PORTER?) IN ORDER TO DISCREDIT WRIGHT."

In addition to raising concerns about the handling of Agent Wright's situation, the documents provided contain other alarming information about questionable practices and incidents within FBI OPR. One such incident was a cheating scandal at the FBI Academy in Quantico, Virginia. FBI OPR received information that two students violated rules and the FBI Academy Honor Code on at least two tests. The information stated that, "After conducting an investigation, it was clear to those involved that the two students had been cheating." One of the students even admitted to cheating. Nevertheless, the Special Agent-in-Charge (SAC) of the FBI Academy disregarded the recommendations for discipline and merely "chose to verbally admonish" the students. The agents apparently were allowed to graduate on September 5, 2003. Whitewashing the cheating incident not only called into question the SAC's performance and judgment, but may have constituted misconduct.

The continuing investigation of Agent Wright, and a FBI Academy cheating scandal swept under the rug show problems still fester at FBI OPR. This information is especially disappointing because Director Mueller has made efforts to improve and reform FBI OPR.

Given our shared concerns about FBI reform and the treatment of FBI whistleblowers, we must get to the bottom of this situation quickly. We would appreciate answers to the following questions by Thursday, August 5, 2004:

1) Do you consider the actions of Mr. Jordan and Mr. Weis regarding Agent Wright to be appropriate and in accordance with FBI standards of conduct? What action, if any, is being taken regarding the way they conducted the investigation?

2) When and why was the investigation against Agent Wright moved to DOJ OPR?

3) Why did Mr. Weis allow two interviewees in the investigation of Agent Wright to review FBI documents of their interview summaries with FBI OPR? Did either of them request changes to the interview summaries, and did the FBI comply? Please provide the initial draft of their FD-302s, and the final copy after they reviewed them. Is it standard practice and/or procedure at the FBI to allow witnesses or interviewees in OPR cases to review their FD-302s? Please list any other incidents of this occurring in the past five years.

4) Did any FBI official grant permission for agents in the Chicago Field Division to speak to one or more reporters about Agent Wright, as the Chicago ASAC requested on June 17, 2003? If so, please identify the FBI official(s) who granted permission, and identify the agents in Chicago who spoke to reporters about Agent Wright.

5) Do you believe the FBI Academy SAC made an appropriate decision by verbally admonishing the two students who were alleged to have cheated, as opposed to taking more severe disciplinary action against them, such as expulsion? Was the SAC's decision consistent with the FBI's zero-tolerance for lying, cheating and stealing, and the FBI's motto of "Fidelity, Bravery, Integrity"?

6) Also, the end of Mr. Roberts' letter mentions documents that are interview summaries (FD 302s) of Jeffrey Howard, former Principal Assistant Deputy Attorney General and Chief of Staff for the Deputy Attorney General at DOJ (Sept, 22, 1995), and of Director Mueller, formerly an AUSA (Sept. 21, 1995). Please provide these documents as well.
joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #69 
l News Business Edge Nation/World                         Opinion                         Sports                         UA Sports                 TC Varsity                         Restaurants                         Blogs                         All Headlines                                                 Site Map »                                                                          
Published: 01.11.2008

Sheriff's Department has deputized 76 federal agents

CARLI BROSSEAU
                                Tucson Citizen                        
                       
The Pima County Sheriff's Department deputized 76 federal agents to enforce state law in the past year, according to department personnel records. Seventeen others are being added this month.
State law allows a sheriff to sign off on a request for state law officer certification, which then gets sent to the state law enforcement accreditation agency for safekeeping.
But there is another way for setting up such an arrangement - a memorandum of understanding, which has to be approved by the county Board of Supervisors.
Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik blames that strategy for the public outcry at Tuesday's board meeting over a proposal to deputize a Border Patrol agent.
He said the cross-certification, the legal term for deputizing a law officer certified by a federal agency or another state, was only up to the board because the Border Patrol insisted on it.
Under most circumstances, the act of giving federal or other state law officers the power to enforce Arizona law falls under the radar, as it has 93 times in the past year in Pima County.
But Tuesday's proposal came into the spotlight for two reasons: the public hearing and because it involved enforcement of immigration-related law.
At the meeting, critics said approving an agent's cross-certification could translate into racial profiling. They accused Dupnik of acting increasingly like Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who has taken an aggressive anti-illegal-immigrant stance.
Dupnik, however, maintains his aim of fighting crime in Pima County has not shifted. He said he is not out to enforce federal law.
"What we are doing is addressing the crime associated with the border," he said. "That's what affects us."
The debate centers on Dupnik's Border Crime Unit - two sergeants and 14 deputies working on intelligence-driven assignments along the border.
But the unit, created in June, counts among its accomplishments the arrest of dozens of illegal immigrants.
Agent Mike Scioli, a Border Patrol spokesman, said it was unclear Thursday evening why the Border Patrol decided the Board of Supervisors hearing was a better route than the normal process.
Though about a dozen of the Tucson sector's 3,000 or so agents work on interagency task forces, none is deputized to work directly with a county's sheriff's department, he said.
"This is an opportunity to pass information at a more rapid rate," he said. "Maybe this wasn't the best angle to come at it, but we'll look at other ones."
Both Scioli and Dupnik said talks between the agencies would resume. It is unclear whether they will pursue the approval process outlined by the law. "We'll see where the talks take us," Dupnik said.
Records of cross-certifications go back three years, said Ted Brandon, a compliance specialist with the Arizona Peace Officer Standards and Training Board.
In that time, no Border Patrol agents have been approved, he said. Most of the federal agents deputized work on drug interdiction, he said.
Sixty-eight were from the Drug Enforcement Administration, said Capt. Chris Radtke, who heads administrative services for the sheriff's department. Seven were from the FBI. One is a postal inspector.
Seventeen more FBI agents are in the approval process, he said.
Manuel Johnson, a spokesman for the FBI, said deputizing agents allows them to enforce local and state law, but most of the time agents work with task forces, not a single agency.
The DEA gets its agents deputized to expand prosecution options, said Anthony J. Coulson, assistant special agent in charge of the Tucson district office.
The U.S. Attorney's Office has prosecution thresholds, he said. For example, it will not prosecute a marijuana seizure if the drugs weighed less than 500 pounds. That case would be prosecuted in state court.
Coulson said agents don't always work directly with local law enforcement.
He emphasized that agents' powers are limited by agreements with the county. They are limited to drug-related arrests, he said. Agents cannot do traffic stops.
Without those limitations, federal agents are, by law, given all the powers of an Arizona peace officer. They have those powers for one year.
The law also states that neither the state nor the county is liable for any acts or failure to act by a federal peace officer.
joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #70 

Jan. 12, 2008, 12:08AM
Black leaders urge Rosenthal to step down
Ministers who once prayed with the DA now say he misled them

TOOLS

A growing chorus of black leaders on Friday called for besieged Harris County District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal to step down immediately in response to court documents that reveal he used government computers to send and receive racist and sexually explicit e-mails.

The 730 e-mails released Tuesday also show Rosenthal strategized with political consultants and colleagues about his re-election campaign on his county e-mail account, prompting the Texas Attorney General's Office to launch an investigation this week.

As state officials determine whether Rosenthal violated state campaign laws, a coalition of black ministers and other community leaders on Friday called for him to step down immediately, charging the top prosecutor misled them. At least one called for a federal probe of the entire district attorney's office.

They pointed to a racially charged photograph found in Rosenthal's e-mails depicting a black man sprawled out on a sidewalk next to large slices of watermelon, a cup of soda and a chicken bucket. The title of the e-mail: Fatal Overdose. It's unclear how the image arrived in Rosenthal's file.

"We prayed with him; we have been working with him — I feel jilted," said Robert Jefferson, pastor of Cullen Missionary Baptist Church, who is a member of the Houston Ministers Against Crime. "He was smiling with us in one place and stabbing us in our backs in another."

A larger problem?

Another e-mail raising eyebrows among black leaders is a joke received and forwarded by Rosenthal that compares President Bill Clinton to a black man.

The e-mail says Clinton played the saxophone, smoked marijuana and receives a check from the government each month.

Houston City Councilwoman Jolanda "Jo" Jones, a criminal defense lawyer, said the e-mails confirmed what she and others have suspected about the DA's office for years.

"It's systemic, the racism there," Jones said.

She said Rosenthal should be prosecuted to the fullest extent if he violated laws by using county computers to organize a re-election campaign.

Ministers held a news conference Friday at the New Guide Missionary Baptist Church on Dennis Street and questioned whether Rosenthal's e-mails speak to a larger problem in the prosecutor's office.

"It disturbed me so much, I didn't know what to do," Jefferson said.

"How deep does this racism go? How many black kids have been locked up while they laugh at us?"

The Rev. William A. Lawson, pastor emeritus of Wheeler Avenue Baptist Church, agreed.

"The overpopulation of our jails and prisons is in some cases due to the way there were prosecuted," Lawson said. "And he has a negative attitude toward minorities, which makes it easier to prosecute blacks and Latinos."

Lawson said Rosenthal "needs to step down" and added that he wasn't surprised.

"I've dealt with Chuck Rosenthal, and I know him to be a hard-shelled kind of person. It seems that behind that hard shell is a fairly dirty mind," Lawson said.

Call for FBI probe

On Thursday, members of the Houston Chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People also called for Rosenthal's resignation.

"This is a position of trust, and people have to believe in the person who is the DA in this county," said James Douglas, legal counsel for the NAACP Houston chapter.

"His own party has said he doesn't have the integrity to serve in that office, and our position is if he's not trustworthy to be re-elected this year, why does he have the integrity to stay in office now?"

Community activist Quanell X announced plans for a rally outside the county courthouse on Thursday and called for a special federal prosecutor to investigate the district attorney. He contends Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, who is a Republican, cannot objectively investigate Rosenthal.

"We're calling for an FBI probe into the entire district attorney's office," Quanell X said. "We want to make sure no politics is played in this — we don't want to see the Republican Party or the Democratic Party investigating this case."

Allegations of racism

Rosenthal's office sought an indictment against Quanell X for charges of fleeing police in 2004 when he escorted a man suspected of shooting an officer to police headquarters. A jury found the activist guilty, but his conviction was overturned in 2006.

The scandal swirling around Rosenthal did not shock many area black residents, said Robert Muhammad, minister and southwest regional representative of the Nation of Islam.

He said he has complained about Rosenthal being a racist for years and cites the case of Josiah Sutton, the first man exonerated in the HPD crime-lab scandal.

Despite being pardoned in 2003, Rosenthal refused to write a letter to the state saying Sutton was innocent, a formality required so Sutton could receive reparations for being wrongfully convicted and imprisoned.

"This is a man who dragged his feet when it was proven that Josiah Sutton was innocent," Muhammad said.

"People lost their freedom because of this man; people lost their reputation because of this man."

When asked Friday about the calls from the black community for his resignation, Rosenthal replied: "Good — thank you. Have a good day," and hung up the phone.

joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #71 

Boston cop was drunk on day of alleged robbery, attorney says

                                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                                                By Jessica Fargen
                                        Monday, January 14, 2008 -
                                                                                        + Recent Articles                                                                                                                         + Recent Blog Entries                                                                                 + Email                                         + Bio                                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                               
        EmailE-mail          PrintablePrintable          Comments(20) Comments           LargerSmallerText size          ShareShare         Rate(4) Rate
                                                                                               

The disgraced Boston police officer accused of using his BPD-issued weapon to hold up a Roslindale gas station was drunk, off his medication and troubled by his cancer-stricken father on the day of the brazen daytime heist, his attorney said today.

Michael T. Jones, 44, a 20-year BPD veteran, looked forlorn this morning as he was arraigned on armed robbery charges while handcuffed to a Faulkner Hospital bed and wearing a blue hospital gown. Jones stands accused of knocking off the Best of Boston gas station at gunpoint Friday afternoon and then fleeing with $125 in stolen cash after threatening store employees.

Jones’ attorney, Ken Anderson, said Jones had recently moved in with his parents and was caring for his father, who has leukemia. Jones, who calledout sick Jan. 2 and has not been on duty since, also was not takingprescribed medication, Anderson said.

“There are certainly issues about diminished capacity, alcohol intoxication,” said Jones’ attorney Ken Anderson, who entered a not guilty plea on Jones’ behalf. “What happened that day was certainly an aberration.”

Police Commissioner Ed Davis has called Jones’ alleged crimes “reprehensible” and placed the veteran officer on administrative leave after his arrest.

Jones, who was assigned to the E-18 Hyde Park district station, was arrested Friday about 30 minutes after the robbery. Police were aided by witnesses who noted the suspect’s description and wrote down the license plate on the getaway car.

Police found Jones near his parents’ house driving a gray Nissan Maxima and wearing clothes that fit the description of the robber. His service weapon was still holstered to his left side and he had $125 cash, said Assistant District Attorney Gretchen Lundgren.

Lundgren said Jones entered the mom-and-pop station at about 3:50 p.m. wearing a hat, khaki pants and sunglasses. He pointed his gun at 24-year-old clerk, George Makoul, and ordered him to open the register drawer, Lundgren said. As Jones fled the store he allegedly demanded money from a man outside and shoved his firearm into the man’s side, she said.

Jones was taken to the hospital sometime this weekend for treatment of chest pains, according to court personnel. He was ordered held on $50,000 cash bail and ordered to stay away from the Best of Boston gas station, surrender any guns or ammunition and remain drug and alcohol free.

joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #72 

Ex-jail guard accused

Waukesha County officer charged with helping, having relationships with inmates

By JACQUELINE SEIBEL and MIKE JOHNSON
jseibel@journalsentinel.com
Posted: Jan. 15, 2008

Waukesha - A jail guard was charged with felony misconduct in office Tuesday after she was caught in a web of relationships with federal inmates, some of whom were indicted in a sweeping crackdown by state, local and federal authorities on gangs and illegal drug trade in metro Milwaukee.

Advertisement

Former Waukesha County Corrections Officer Nanette Vorath, 37, of Milwaukee also is accused of having a sexual relationship with one inmate, providing a prescription painkiller to another and smuggling documents to another. A conviction would result in up to 3 1/2 years in prison and a $10,000 fine. Vorath is scheduled to be in Waukesha County Circuit Court on Feb. 6.

Vorath was under investigation from October 2006 to April 2007, during which time agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation listened to and recorded 78 phone conversations she had with federal inmates.

Most of the calls were with Craig Nalls, who was a federal inmate in the Waukesha County Jail in 2006 until he was transferred to a federal penitentiary in West Virginia.

The complaint says Nalls and Vorath had sexual contact while he was at the jail and she later sent money to him in West Virginia under the name Nanette Nalls, the complaint says. Vorath is accused of bringing Tylenol 3 from home to federal inmate Courtney Turner, and warning federal inmate Michael Chachere of whom he shouldn't talk to in the jail, the complaint says.

An agent from the Federal Bureau of Investigation alerted Sheriff's Capt. Karen Ruff in March 2007 of the relationship between the guard and the former inmate. Ruff began a criminal and internal investigation. Ruff also listened to the 78 conversations between Vorath and the inmates.

In addition to the criminal violation, Vorath was accused of violating several department policies, Ruff said. Vorath, who had been a corrections officer since April 1996, resigned June 21, Ruff said.

The recorded conversations revealed an intimate relationship between Vorath and Nalls in which they would discuss federal inmates that were housed in the Waukesha jail, the complaint says.

Nalls was sentenced to 120 months in federal prison in August 2006 on a weapons charge after he was arrested in September 2005 for firing a handgun at two men with whom he had a dispute.

A convicted felon, Nalls was not supposed to possess weapons. Nalls had prior convictions for robbery, endangering safety and burglary.

According to the complaint, authorities began investigating Vorath after federal inmate Julius Arberry told the FBI that Vorath had been providing special favors to another federal inmate, Johnny Murphy, including providing discovery materials related to Murphy's court case. Under jail rules, Murphy was not entitled to have that material.

FBI agent Matt Yaeger also was concerned that word was leaking out about inmates who had spoken with federal authorities as part of a conspiracy investigation. Yaeger began checking Vorath's phone records because of that, the complaint says, and that led to the connection with Nalls.

The criminal complaint filed against Vorath did not explain how Nalls was linked to the other federal inmates.

And it does not state what the conspiracy investigation involved.

However, federal court records show that Arberry and Murphy were among 17 people affiliated with a gang who were indicted in October 2006 on conspiracy and drug charges. The members of the gang, known as the First and Keefe Vice Lords, were accused by authorities of distributing cocaine, crack cocaine and marijuana on Milwaukee's north side for about 15 years.

Ten of them had been arrested on Oct. 31, 2006, in raids involving 200 law enforcement officers from the FBI, Milwaukee Police Department, state Department of Justice and other agencies. It was the culmination of a two-year investigation.

Several of the other federal inmates named in the complaint were among 21 arrested in 2005 on federal conspiracy and drug charges in an inquiry that targeted the 2-6 Vice Lords gang in Milwaukee.

joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #73 

Barrow man sues police, borough for harassment

                                                                                                                       

Daniel Lum, owner of Northernmost Tours and a resident of Barrow, has filed a civil lawsuit against the North Slope Borough and several police officers claiming harassment and threats.

The lawsuit comes weeks after an Anchorage-based law firm investigated borough police on a separate case in Barrow.

A report on that investigation has not yet been released, leaving a situation ripe for residents interested in planting tales and allegations against the department.

But what to some may appear to be a sense of distrust among the community, to others is nothing more than a reaction to stronger police presence and stricter enforcement.

"We have had a couple of different reviews of our department that were gladly welcomed by us and we will open the door to anyone," borough Police Chief Don Grimes said.

"The police department has been more fully staffed than it has ever been in the past," Grimes said.

"We have more officers in the streets and that allows for more investigation. People that don't want to obey the law are having a more difficult time with that," he said.

The 16-page complaint filed by Lum and his lawyers, Robert M. Libbey and Jason Skala, details in length Lum's allegations of a Goliath-like police making threats to his life and refusing to arrest a local drug dealer, who allegedly stalked young Native children and attempted to kidnap them.

Lum also accused the police of entering his home without a warrant and spraying Mace around the room he was in with his wife and their youngest child.

According to the complaint, on Aug. 31, 2007, Lum was approached by a child who claimed to have escaped an attempted kidnapping by Scott Coles, a 44-year-old resident of Barrow.

The complaint lists Officers Gwen Grimes, Jose Gutierrez and Benjamin Hunsaker as defendants and claims the three were behind threats made to Lum and his family.

The complaint says the trio entered his home, attacking him and his family and threatening him "to back off" from pursuing the incidents involving Coles.

Lum also accused Grimes of shooting her service pistol towards him on one occasion as he was deflating his tires to allow for safe travel on a beach trail in preparation to escape from her "for fear of bodily injury," according to the complaint.

Mentioning other incidents where residents reported complaints against Coles, who denied the kidnapping claims, Lum alleged unnecessary physical force and causing him humiliation in front of his family.

Advised to put his complaint into writing by the borough, Lum decided not to, for fear of what the police might do to him, said Libbey, Lum's attorney.

"The retaliatory conduct of the North Slope Borough and of its officers, as alleged above, was designed and intended to harass and intimidate plaintiffs Daniel and Polly Lum and other Inupiat persons and families living in Barrow," the complaint said.

"(The retaliatory conduct) was intended to obstruct the complaints and charges by Inupiat residents of predatory stalking and assault attempts by a white resident," it said.

In early November, Lum told The Sounder that the Federal Bureau of Investigation would be coming to Barrow to investigate the incident.

David Harding, the borough's spokesperson, confirmed that the FBI had deputized a state trooper to investigate in Barrow, but no reports have been released following the November visit. The FBI said it could not confirm or deny such a visit taking place.

When North Slope Borough Mayor Edward Itta was elected, a new phrase, "healthy communities," became a common term in day-to-day discourse across the borough.

One of the aspects of healthy communities is a crime-free community, according to Grimes.

The police and the borough have been encouraging local residents to participate in community-oriented policing, which was implemented fully in Barrow and the surrounding villages.

The initiative is finally beginning to show results, and according to Grimes, there has been a 200 percent increase in the amount of tip information coming in to the police regarding drug and alcohol sale and importation.

A relatively new addition to the police, in the form of a four-legged, energetic chocolate Lab named Hershey, has been instrumental in sniffing out drugs flown into the communities or sent by mail.

"There has been a lot more aggressive stance on fighting crime and illegal activity and a lot more desire to be open and communicative with more of our citizens," Grimes said.

"We treat everybody equally, and there are no sacred cows in the North Slope Borough. Everybody needs to be accountable," he said.

"The majority of the citizens appreciate the efforts the police department is making. But there is a smaller group of individuals that don't get away with things as easily as they used to," he said.

Grimes could not comment directly on the complaint because it is still under review. He concluded that this is an adjustment period for the community to have a police force that has the time to investigate.

"We are a lot more proactive than we have been in the past. Our job is to bring the trust back to the community and for them to have a lot of faith.

"It would be nice to hear from the silent majority that does support us," he said.

joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #74 
January 16, 2008 9:14 AM PST

Customs agent took bribes to access Fed police databases

A recent court case demonstrates, once again, the dangers of assembling massive police databases and trusting that law enforcement officers with access are paragons of virtue.

In this case, the unvirtuous Fed is named Rafael Pacheco, an agent with the U.S. Customs Service in Florida. And the database in question is the Treasury Enforcement Communications System, or TECS, which contains more than a billion records used by Customs and other federal police.

Pacheco was, to put it bluntly, a corrupt cop. He sold access to TECS for money.

He got caught when a Mexican man named Fidencio Estrada was nabbed by state police in a traffic stop near Houston. Estrada had Pacheco's business card with him, and the state trooper asked him about it. After receiving a suspicious answer, the trooper phoned Pacheco, who called back and said that Estrada was a "huge" confidential informant and demanded that the trooper "let him go now."

You can imagine what the truth was. The U.S. Customs Service, which was subsequently renamed Immigration and Customs Enforcement, would later say that Estrada was never a confidential informant. Instead, Estrada and his family had sent about $18,000 in Western Union money transfers to the Customs agent, who deposited the cash in his personal bank account and used it to pay off a vehicle loan with the Florida Customs Federal Credit Union. Estrada is, according to ICE, a drug trafficker.

In return, in February 2000, Pacheco accessed TECS to check for records on Estrada. He searched for Estrada under two aliases and looked up records for those aliases in the NCIC database, which lists outstanding warrants against a person. He also helped Estrada's family members in Mexico obtain visas.

TECS, by the way, is described in a Justice Department report as including a watch list mechanism and, more generally, is: "Designed to identify individuals, businesses, and vehicles suspected of or involved in violation of federal law. TECS is also a communications system permitting message transmittal between law enforcement offices and other federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. The database provides access to the FBI's NCIC and the National Law Enforcement Telecommunications System. The TECS database serves as the principal information system supporting border management and the law enforcement mission of the DHS's U.S. Customs and Border Protection and other federal law enforcement agencies."

So what eventually happened? Thanks to the happenstance of the traffic stop, the access-for-cash scheme unraveled, and Pacheco was convicted of receiving a bribe, hindering law enforcement, money laundering, obstruction of justice, and unlawfully accessing restricted federal computer databases. He was sentenced to 87 months in prison (and a separate 60-month sentence to be served at the same time).

As for Estrada, a U.S. permanent resident, he was found guilty by a jury of conspiring to bribe a public official, conspiring to launder money, 5 counts of bribery, and 10 counts of money laundering. He was sentenced to 41 months in prison, followed by 36 months supervised release.

He appealed, claiming that there was insufficient evidence, that the convictions were based on inadmissable hearsay, and other technical grounds. But the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld his convictions last Monday.

joeb

Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 4,457
Reply with quote  #75 
Cedar Rapids officer admits having sex with woman he pulled over

Associated Press - January 18, 2008 6:44 PM ET

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) - A Cedar Rapids police officer has admitted having sex with a woman after he pulled her over in a traffic stop in 2004.

Kevin Sims pleaded guilty today to depriving a person of their constitutional rights while acting under color of state law.

According to the U.S. attorney's office, he faces up to one year in prison and is permanently banned from law enforcement in the United States.

Sims admitted pulling the woman's car over in spring 2004 and failing to arrest the woman after she told him she had a suspended driver's license. Instead, Sims ordered her to drive to a nearby park where they had sex.

Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

? ?
Copyright ? 2001-2004 Who?s A Rat. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.
?
Powered by Website Toolbox - Create a Website Forum Hosting, Guestbook Hosting, or Website Chat Room for your website.